A magnificent conclusion to a great series.
I would also like to know more about the "was Germany set up to loose WWII" subject. It's one I have been struggling with for a long time.
Back in the 1980's I met a young German girl through a mutual friend. She explained how the German education system was designed to make the youth of Germany feel ashamed of and guilty for what their parents/grandparents had done. They were taken on regular visits to Auschwitz and other preserved 'concentration camps'.
It was very sad.
Combine that with exactly the opposite situation in the UK, whereby we were conditioned to blame the Germans for all the evils in the world and be proud that "we" were the victors.
Personally I felt ashamed, even though it was no more my fault that that German girl's and all based upon lies.
Yes, this is how the german education system works. Visiting Auschwitz is mandatory, with guided tours. The supposed evils of national socialism make up most of the content of history lessons in Germany.
I think the biggest clue to the National Socialists being controlled opposition is how the Treaty of Versailles separated East Prussia from the rest of Germany and created the convenient future problem of the Polish Corridor. So Woodrow Wilson definitely knew when he insisted on that passage in the treaty. I think that's pretty easy to see, but it doesn't prove that National Socialism was subverted. The polish aggression and cruelties against the german minority in Poland definitely happened, and justified some kind of response. A sensible response with the aim of de-escalation would have been defensive in nature - taking all ethnic germans home into Germany, for example.
But those who created the conditions of WW1 and controlled Britain needed a Fascist Germany that prepared for war, and the influence of the Vatican on the rise of Fascism shows that the National Socialists were not able to rise to power on their own, they needed the Vatican to destroy the conservative opposition in Germany. The Vatican built Fascism from scratch - for example in Spain, Italy and Germany. The spanish population resisted the most, and I think the Vatican even sent in death squads and weapons to Spain because the Spanish military wasn't ready to fight against their own people. The Spanish history shows that people were neither interested in communism nor in fascism, they simply wanted freedom. But this was unacceptable to the secret groups that were already in power behind the curtain, ever since the independent kingdoms were destroyed between 1600 and 1900.
So National Socialism wasn't an isolated movement, it was a part of a greater conservative movement in Spain and Italy and some Eastern European Countries. Which should raise some eyebrows, as Hitler is usually portrayed as a noble lone leader by his fans. Which by definition means that we aren't looking at something that can be understood by only looking at Germany. What fascism appears to be for me is the attempt by those who controlled the Vatican to create an opposition to Russian nihilism and communism, to prepare for a clash between those two. When we look at our history, we see that all nations have been controlled by the same groups for hundreds of years. Central Europe was already in Cabal control by 1700. There is no reason to believe there could be any independent movement in the 20th Century, when the Cabal had already subverted all relevant structures in society for a long time. We see similar synthetic oppositions today - between progressive and conservative movements, but they are obviously both part of the same group. It's easier to see through it today, but in 100 years it will be difficult to find evidence for this.
In the beginning of the 20th Century, the last monarchies got dismantled within Europe. being replaced by concept of modern politics and democracy. This created the counter-movement of traditionalism, which the Vatican used to impose Fascism.
Militarism was a core ideology of the Third Reich, and the most important tool to influence the culture was via Gleichschaltung of all institutions with the will of National Socialism - essentially creating an authoritarian and collectivist movement. Even though the results of this movements were largely positive at first - old Germans alive today still remember the Third Reich as the best time of their lifes. It was an euphoria that gripped the Germans which hadn't been seen before, if you didn't object to the politics you felt you were part of something electrifying and big, something unique - the goal was to create something like the perfect society, a paradise on earth with Hitler as the savior of the Germans.
Here's an ad from that time - it says "In lockstep with our time", which shows the collectivist attitude of fascism:
We also see that the most powerful figures left Germany after the war, faked their death, and betrayed Germany alltogether, again only with the help of the Vatican and their rat lines (Hitler, Mengele, Bormann, Goebbels). Martin Bormann prepared for loss long before 1945 and together with leading german industrialists they channeled most of the liquid assets into safe havens before Germany imploded, essentially re-building Germany after the war again, but today Bormann's heirs are responsible for draining money and resources out of Germany into the hands of a few anoynmous shareholders (most of them probably living in South America, some still connected to leading German industrial families like Krupp), and he started to willingly collaborate with a formerly despised minority group in Finance.
Then we have the false flag operation called Gleiwitz incident, which hints to the true intentions of the German leaders at that time when it comes to Poland. It all reads like the perfect plot for WW2, and everyone behaved perfectly in line with the script. How likely is that?
Basically the treaties between Poland and Britain/France on the one hand, and between Germany and Russia were all set up in a way as to reliably cause WW2 in case Germany attacks Poland. So I think if the German leadership wouldn't have been controlled opposition, they would have looked through this game and simply not attacked Poland so aggressively. I think Hitler didn't necessarily want to attack them, but his generals wanted. They could have simply occupied and annexed the northern part of the corridor instead of overrunning Poland entirely. Instead, following the attack on Poland, we see Germany expanding it's borders west and east aggressively, swallowing up everything they can get.
There are some signs that the National Socialist leaders were influenced by dark occult groups and energies. While the idea to promote the concave earth showed that they were willing to radically question the jewish science establishment mostly represented by Einstein, it's also obvious that publicly they radically destroyed the opposition of thought. When Johannes Lang published his book about the concave earth, he was promptly put into prison in the 1940s in the operation against secret sciences, where we also see the usual discrepancy between Christianity and Vatican, with the Vatican prosecuting actual Christians as usual:
The action against secret doctrines and so-called secret sciences, also called Aktion Heß or Sonderaktion Heß or Hess-Aktion [# 1][1], was directed in National Socialist Germany primarily against occultists. The action, which began on June 9, 1941, was a reaction of the NSDAP party leadership to the so-called "England Flight" by Rudolf Hess, the deputy of Adolf Hitler. Hess, who had a penchant for the occult, had let himself be tempted by two personal horoscopes to make his flight. Martin Bormann and Joseph Goebbels, who were strictly opposed to the occult, were the main protagonists of the action ordered by Hitler. The executing agencies were the Security Service (SD) and the police under the direction of Reinhard Heydrich. As a result of the action, not only were many occultists arrested, but members of the Christian Community and other organizations also fell victim to it.
The measures of the Third Reich against opponents were drastic and truly showed a lack of humanity and empathy. Those with empathy were quickly circled out (like Hess) and psychopaths like Bormann and Goebbels pulled the strings in the years before the end of the war - Hitler had lost most of his power by that point. He pointed the finger at the right groups - freemasons, for example, and he certainly was the greatest statesman of the 20th Century. But the Third Reich was more than Hitler.
Without the Vatican, the National Socialists would not have been able to come to power in the beginning, and likewise they wouldn't have been able to leave the sinking ship after they had completed their mission.
