Update: This thread seems to be going deeper into a toxic politically-oriented hole. I don't like this and won't participate in it any longer. I'm absolutely not interested in all these pointless arguments, nor in giving any kind of further evaluations of the 2nd world war, which is a very sensitive and controversial topic, both in terms of moral and legal side of the question. And I would also like to warn other people to beware of possible instigators who purposefully heat up the conversation in order to provoke other people and learn about their (possibly hidden) political views.
I understand your reaction, but it would be a shame in further parts as your input is most valuable! Your theory is spot on, and further parts will be about backing it up!
If i can prove at least to some extent through the revisionist and academic literature, that Hitler was not an agent of the masons/illuminati, or it simply doesn't make sense, your theory is on even more solid ground, but for that i have to get through the most controversial parts first.
P.S. Another reason why i think this whole "Hitler is same bloodline as every other bad guy", without any differentiation, is detrimental to our research, because it diminishes the fact, that there were two opposing forces.
Just one example, even if most important members of the nazis were jewish or freemasons, or whatever, does is change the fact, that there were two sides fundamentally opposed to each other?
If Hitler was part of the cabal, then there isn't anything more to say deeper about it, he was just another scumbag like Stalin, Roosevelt, all the same clique.
We don't need to ask ourselves, why there were two forces, where did they came from, and how do they relate to the fall of the old world. Its just all the same. That's why i think this is another modern ploy to veil the truth about our history.
Last edited: