I've found both the full video presentation and an article by Huang, which you can assess here:
Video
浙大黄河清教授扒皮西方伪史2/3，金字塔、古希腊、泥板都是伪造的。_哔哩哔哩_bilibili
4-part article
Part 1:
以圖證史：希臘雅典、埃及金字塔和伊朗波斯波利斯“古蹟”都是現代新建偽造（四則）（一） - sa123
Part 2:
翕兮 | 希腊雅典、埃及金字塔和伊朗波斯波利斯“古迹”都是现代新建伪造（二）
Part 3:
以图证史：希腊雅典、埃及金字塔和伊朗波斯波利斯“古迹”都是现代新建伪造（四则）（三）
Part 4:
以圖證史：希臘雅典、埃及金字塔和伊朗波斯波利斯“古蹟”都是現代新建偽造（四則）（四） - sa123
His research is quite original, as I have never come across anywhere else mentioning his points
Here is a summary:
On Greece: point 1-4
Huang's claim is that the Athens ruins were first designed by Jacquel Paul Babin and Jacob Spon, which were then refined by Jacques Carrey, and refined again by James Stuart, whose design was then used as the blueprint for the construction
1. Parthenon
In Jacques Paul Babin's "Relation de l’etat present de la ville d’Athenes",
The Parthenon is depicted with 4 columns in front along with a spire.
In Jacob Spon's "Voyage d'Italie, de Dalmatie, de Grèce et du Levant, Lyon",
he concurred with Babin and depicted Athens with a river to the South of the Acropolis (fact is there is no river in the proximity of area),
the Parthenon is depicted with a spire as well, but with 8 columns in front.
The west pediment of the Parthenon is said to depict the birth of Athena, which seems irreconcilable as the current structure has it on the East side (note: it could be argued that it has been moved simply due to the reconstruction)
Jacques Carrey Parthenon drawings also depict the Parthenon with a spire, but this time with 6 columns in front.
r/GreekMuslims - One of the few sketches of Parthenon Mosque by Jacques Carrey 1674
Category:Jacques Carrey - Wikimedia Commons
Incidentally, his drawings depict the same metope design as the current construction.
Carrey's relief designs are then copied by James Stuart, in "The Antiquities of Athens".
2. Temple of Zeus
In Jacques Paul Babin "Relation de l’etat present de la ville d’Athenes",
the temple is drawn with a 'second level' on top of the columns,
and was described to consists of a total of 120 columns;
Spon corresponds with the description of 110 columns.
Huang argues that would leave no open space for the temple if there truly were 120 colums originally.
in Carrey drawings, the ruins of the "second level" shrunk in size;
and he made the preliminary designs of the Arch of Hadrian.
Note, the ruins of the "second level" was built at one point
[Athens - temple of Zeus Olypmpios] (The J. Paul Getty Museum Collection)
The Mystery Structure on Top of Athens' Temple of Olympian Zeus (hilarious article claiming it was utilized by stylites)
Huang also argues it makes no sense there are no remnants of the rest of the columns. And if the temple of Zeus is fake, then we can also reject the antiquity of the Parthenon as the degree of weathering is similar between the two
3. "Tower of the Winds" and Erechtheion
the current construction of "Tower of the Winds" and Erechtheion are very similar to the design given by Stuart; while the construction of the Acropolis and amphitheater are also similar to the drawings by Carrey.
Carrey depicted a "Frankish" tower at the Acropolis in his drawings, which was at one point built, but was demolished in 1874
Frankish Tower (Acropolis of Athens) - Wikipedia
4. Metopes
There is a metope displayed in the British museum has the same design as one given by Stuart, which Stuart designed for the North side of the Parthenon. This metope cannot be authentic as the North side of the Parthenon was said to be destroyed.
There are also metopes depicting Carrey's designs, since it has already been established that Carrey's designs are fabrications, the metopes cannot be authentic.
Metopes said to be from the east side of the Parthenon are displayed at the Louvre and the British museum respectively, however the style of the design and degree of weathering is completely different between the two.
In conclusion, these artists depictions could not be true, as they conflict with each other; but if they were fabrications, then it does not make sense that elements in their drawings do exist in the current construction - so the construction itself must come after the drawings.
=====
5. Pyramids
Early depictions of pyramids have completely different dimensions as the ones we see now.
The Sphinx is depicted with a human face, and there are 2 sphinx(es?) in some depictions.
"Atlas du voyage en Haute et Basse-Egypte" by Vivant Denon, supposedly drawn during Napoleon's Egypt expedition, depicts the Sphinx's head slanting upwards
"Les pyramides de Memphis, le Sphinx, au soleil couchant" by Balzac Charles Louis depicted Egypt's geograpy as a Hügelland，not as a desert
Both of which indicate the pictures were fabrications
6. Geopolymer concrete
In Jacob Spon's "Voyage d'Italie, de Dalmatie, de Grèce et du Levant, Lyon", he descibred "pierre fondue" (melted stone) was common in France. In fact Spon mentioned this specifically to contrast it with Roman stone which he said was 'whole' stone
For some megalithic stones in the aforementioned sites, the surface is so smooth that it is reflective; these stones could not have been naturally formed
7. Persepolis
Eugene Fladin made several drawings of Persepolis which have the same style and design as the current construction, but the overall placement not the same as the actual construction. Huang argues Fladin was the true designer of Persepolis, and his drawing were his early drafts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_paintings_and_plots_by_Pascal_Coste_and_Eugène_Flandin
Robert Ker Porter made a drawing of the Lamassu which is slightly different from the actual one at Persepolis (the design around the girth).
Huang also thus Porter is the true designer of it.
8. Stone slabs
