Was the temple of King Salomo in Spain, Part 03

[FreiherrvonL]

Temple of Solomon in Spain​

​

Touchet is the owner of a hotel in the middle of the fortress of Carcassonne in the south of France. I myself have already visited this fortress twice. He is an amateur historian who is said to have incredible knowledge. As early as 1988, he stated that it was becoming increasingly doubtful whether Solomon's Temple in Palestine existed at all. He found out through the study of the Iberian script that it resembles the Aramaic. In any case, according to scholars, the Aramaic language is closer to the Indo-European language than to any other. Touchet found that the Sephardim of the Iberian Peninsula never came from Palestine. They have always been based there. He says that the kingdom of Solomon was in Spain. It was only after Solomon that the "Ibri" appeared in Canaan. In the chapter on the people of Jvda, we discussed that the Spaniards got their name from boars. We could discuss at this point whether "Ibri" also played a role, but he was from the tribe of Levi.

We now have option 1: The Spaniards are descended from the Jvda tribe. King David and King Solomon are also descended from the tribe of Jvda.

2nd possibility: The Spaniards are descended from the tribe of Levi via the Ibri.

3rd possibility: It's a mixture of both. I think this is the most likely option. The tribe of Levi was the 13th tribe that did not receive any land rights of its own and mixed with all other tribes with its priests from the beginning. Thus, they were also part of the tribe of Jvda. So, it is not surprising that we can locate descendants of the tribe of Jvda as well as of the tribe of Levi in Spain. It is likely that further mixing took place at a later time, so that we can locate many tribes in many countries today.

Granada, Touchet says, would have been the original Zion and the Temple of Solomon stood where the Alhambra is today. The Hebrew Bible has no Hebrews, only Ibri. The lions at the Lion Fountain in the " Patio de los Leones" are actually dated to the 10th century BC, i.e., exactly to the time of King Solomon.

The archaeologist Valladar, as well as the specialist in Arab culture, Almagro Cardenas, have noticed that this fountain basin is reminiscent of the " Bronze Sea" in the Temple of Solomon. The alphabet script, says Touchet, also originated in Iberia. The alphabet, consisting of the Phoenician, Aramaic and Hebrew alphabets, did not reach the Middle East until the Ibero-Semites. This is how Iberian rivers and mountains names were brought from the Iberian Peninsula to the Orient. The Old Testament would describe the Iberian Peninsula, not Palestine. He states what I consider to be more than possible for the New Testament as well. In my view, the Acts of the Apostles took place largely in Europe. More about this in my book "The Jesustwins".

In his books, Uwe Topper refers to the statements of Milosz, who once said: "Iberia is the oldest civilized country in our world." I can hardly agree with that, as he forgot the roots of those from Atlantis and further back. But there is certainly some truth hidden in the core messages. Topper visited the Iberian Peninsula to see for himself. He discovered countless higher beach lines and ruins of former seaports, which can only be explained by a tectonic sinking of the earth's plates. This original civilization stretched from the Iberian Peninsula to Denmark. As early as 1928, the famous archaeologist "Elena Maria Whishaw" reported on the remains of a prehistoric culture in Andalusia.

The fact is, however, that what is based on the Bible and believed is not substantiated in any extra-biblical source. It is probable that the Davidic-Solomonic empire never existed in the Middle East, or only at a later time. The Ibri also had contact with the Philistines from the Bible, who later also emigrated to the eastern part of the Mediterranean. Later, the two peoples became neighbors again, this time only in Canaan. Furthermore, the question arises as to why the Spanish King Philip II called himself the second Solomon in the 16th century AD. Also keep in mind that in the Spanish flag we can find the two pillars of the Temple of Solomon. What did he know that is withheld from us today?

Likewise, in my book "My Life as Apostle Thomas" I tell the story of "Philip of Gaul" who brought families and other apostles to Jesus and Mary Magdalene in Glastonbury. He did this with a boat belonging to King Solomon. In Gaul, in the south of France? This could be another indication that this Solomon originally resided in Europe. Likewise, in the Gospel of Matthew we find the genealogy of Joseph, the father of Jesus. Accordingly, Joseph, and thus Jesus, would have been a direct descendant of King Solomon. I only have one problem with the biblical texts. If, according to the scriptures, there were 24 generations between King Solomon and Joseph, it cannot be that Solomon resided around 950 B.C. This would mean that every ruler became a father at the average age of 40, which is more than unlikely. If we were to take an age of 22 as a basis, we would arrive at only 528 years before Joseph.

He had probably lived anyway. According to our research, in Spain. Under the rule of his son Rehoboam, the country was divided. Rehoboam ruled over the south, while Jeroboam I ruled over the north. Here's just a thought that just popped into my head. If we really have 24 generations from David to King Solomon, then we would be in the 6th century B.C. At that time, the Gauls, an ancient Celtic tribe, invaded Spain from France and ruled the north. Could there be connections here? In this case, would Rehoboam represent the peoples ruling south, whereas Jeroboam was a Gaul, a so-called Celtiberian? In many medieval paintings about King Solomon, we also find more European-looking architecture and nature, as well as many protagonists with blond and red hair. Has our entire European history been stolen and distorted? In the following picture, Solomon was depicted red-haired, as in many other paintings, paintings and frescoes. In addition, he has flowing, not curly hair. The Sephardim people, or Sefardim, are descendants of the IWS from Spain, who were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula. At that time, they emigrated to North Africa, France, Britain and Northern Europe, including the Netherlands and Germany. S'farad is the Hebrew name for Spain. Culture and language are still based on their Iberian history. In more recent times, old Sephardim have even been allowed to be renaturalized in Spain. A memorable example is the case of the Sephardic family "de Toledo", who run a large pharmaceutical company in Switzerland. The surname "de Toledo" is very significant here. The Ashkenazim, on the other hand, are more Eastern and Central European.

Fig.: King David, depicted with reddish-brown hair on a fresco in Jerusalem. The shape of the head, cheekbones and prominent chin also speak volumes. Source: Adobe Fotostock

Fig.: King David's son, King Solomon. In addition to the European look, pay attention to the cross on the robe, source: Adobe Fotostock

Fig.: King Solomon with light hair and again the cross of paws.

Abb.: Gemälde von Jan Massys, David und Batseba

The tribe of Simeon had settled Spain, or represents the Spanish people. However, King David does not come from the line of Simeon, but from the line of Perez-Jvda. But that shouldn't bother you, because over time the lines mixed up or people married into others. In this respect, this is not surprising. Reddish-brown hair could be due to Jvda, like Simeon, or a mixture of the two. Solomon was begat by King David with Bathsheba, who was actually the wife of the Hittite king Uriah. After Uriah's death, David took Bathsheba as his wife. If we look at depictions of Bathsheba, we quickly notice that she is depicted red-haired and fair-skinned in almost all of the pictures. Here again a reference to the origins of the Hittites, who did not speak Indo-European for nothing.

Demon Towers​

Let's take a closer look at the information that King Solomon used the 72 demons to build a temple. In the Babylonian Talmud (Gitt. 68ab) it is explained that they were male and female demons. In Deuteronomy 27:5 we find a reference to the fact that when temples were built, it was not permissible to hew them with iron tools. The same traditions can be found among our Celtic ancestors, whose history is much older. There, during the construction of holy cities, thinggrounds, and dolmens, the use of iron tools was forbidden, otherwise they would be desecrated, see Exodus 20:25;

"25 But if you make me an altar of stones, you must not build them up as hewn ⟨stones⟩ for you would have swung your chisel over it and profaned it."

Also to be found 1 Kings 6:7
"7 And when the house was built, it was built of stones unhewn from the quarry, and hammer and chisel ⟨or⟩ any ⟨other⟩ iron instrument were not heard in the house when it was built."

Again, a reference to Europe. Even Stonehenge was built with unhewn stones, typical of Celtic megalithic structures. The ancient Celtic menhirs were also made of unhewn stones, as God created them. The Canaanites also built their temples in this way. In the architecture of the cult of Mithraic we find this method of construction as well. The temples of Bal were also made of unhewn stones. They had copied and copied.

Solomon mainly used the demon named Asmedai, also called Asmodeus. On the other hand, when the temple was completed, Asmedai tricked King Solomon into loosening his bonds. Asmedai then threw the king far out of the country and threw the king's ring into the sea. Asmedai sat down on the throne of Solomon and desired his wives. In a roundabout way as a beggar, King Solomon regained possession of his ring and necklace with the true name of God (Ecclesiastes 1:12). So, he was able to have Asmedai removed from the throne and bind.

Solomon received his magic ring from the Archangel Michael, with whose power he could bind demons such as Ornias, Beelzebub, Onoskelis and Asmedai. According to the story, he forced them to build his temple. You could also call him a kind of exorcist. Now let's consider the following: If Solomon really had bound countless demons and forced them to build the temple, the question would have to be asked, what energy does this temple carry within itself? A loving, kind, and warm-hearted energy of a loving God? Or rather the opposite? The temple was built by demonic forces, with which dark energies are at work in this temple. Why has such a temple been venerated for thousands of years? I have sufficiently explained in my books and have repeatedly explained who the God of the Old Testament is. He was vindictive, jealous, belligerent, and bloodthirsty. It is impossible for him to have followed that. When Archangel Michael gave him his signet ring, it was from the loving and kind God, God is good. And if it's not good, it's not God. Or was YHWH the same as Jesus' and only adulterated? We are still looking into this.

In this respect, the question should be asked here as to what really happened. As far as we know, Solomon was not an evil rascal. It is also a fact that he seemed to have understood the cosmos. The Seal of Solomon is a powerful symbol based on cosmic mathematics. It generates a great and positive energy. I'll explain this symbol in more detail later. The symbol of the Metathrone is also based on this.

According to the ancient Near Eastern view, all phenomena of life could be controlled by their real name. Solomon himself described in the book of Wisdom 7:17-21 that he would control natural phenomena. God, he says, gave him the knowledge of things, the understanding of the structure of the world, the action of the elements, the change of solstices and seasons, the cycle of years and the position of the stars, the power over the spirits and thoughts of men. He had known all that was hidden, for it was taught to him by Wisdom, the Master of all things. Just like one of his most famous descendants: Jesus.


Is it conceivable that King Solomon's temple was not built by demons, but that these and other evil creatures were trapped and banished in it? After all, there are traditions that the king of Tyre helped him build it. And could it be that the destruction of the temple set these fiends free again? Think back to the legend in Toledo. That there was supposed to have been a tower there, to which each king was to attach an additional lock, and the contents were never to be opened? The last king ignored the warning and had all the locks opened and entered the tower, or temple. Was he opening a kind of Pandora's box with it? After all, the Visigoth kings were attacked by the Arabs shortly afterwards and they conquered the country. It was in this land that they found King Solomon's table. So where did Solomon's temple really stand? Jerusalem or southern Spain? Shall I tell you what impulse I had? Both could be right. I am now certain that there were seven Troys. Why not also several such temples, which served to capture and bind demons or bad energy. The history of Toledo and that of Granada sound like such a temple. As well as the traditions from Jerusalem, as well as the indications that there was such a facility in the Alhambra. However, when it comes to Solomon's actual seat of government, I tend primarily to Spain. An image caught my eye during a meditation. I was in Tuscany in Italy several times many years ago and visited the town of San Gimignano again and again. This place has only about 7500 inhabitants and currently 13 large towers in the middle of the city. In the Middle Ages, there were once 72 of these tall towers. The city is surrounded by a massive city wall with several fortified towers. San Gimignano is also known as the "City of Towers". The official justification for the establishment of these innumerable towers is that they served as a retreat when the enemy approached and the looting and pillaging began.

Abb.: San Gimignano, Italy, Source: Adobe Fotostock

Excuse me, it's hard to think of a more stupid reasoning. You flee to a tower where you are completely at the mercy of the enemy? You will be starved or burned by a fire. It couldn't be done any worse. Furthermore, I have been to some of these towers myself. They do not have large and habitable rooms, no different levels, no cooking area and some of them are very narrow. And why this enormous height? Especially in the Middle Ages, magic, alchemy, exorcism and belief in demons were very present. Did the people of San Gimignano know exactly what to do to catch a demon, tie it up, and bind it in one of these towers? And in this city, just like in Toledo, there is a Devil's Tower. It is described that the first owner returned from a long journey and found the tower higher than before. He had not commissioned any expansion or renovation. Even the inhabitants did not see anyone who would have expanded the tower. This tower also lacks windows and there is a large crack in the façade attributed to the devil. In Regensburg, Germany, we see a similar scenario. No medieval town north of the Alps had as many towers as Regensburg. However, the height of the towers could also have had another or further function. Energy transformers for free energy. The higher a tower is, the more energy it collects around its top by condensing the aether waves. This is nothing new. There are countless scientific papers on this. In the next few years, all of this will come to light and be revealed. Then we realize that we have been led around by the nose with electricity that we have to pay dearly. There are so many old things to revive and air. We don't have to reinvent anything, everything is and was actually already there, just hidden. When the curtain rises, we will once again be able to experience miracles that we cannot yet imagine. This could be gigantic and we can look forward to it.

End Part 03

 

[Jef Demolder]

Solomon still belongs to the gods, you are right on that Freiherr. This is clear from what the authors behind the invented Jewish historian Flavius Josephus write about Solomon in the Antiquitates Judaicae. After him, Rehoboam and Jeroboam stand for the transition from the time of the gods to human history. The two kingdoms of the biblical story, with their sequence of kings, each with a certain number of years of reign, are a parody on human history (human history is written that way, and humand have different kingdoms). If Solomon is still a god, then the works of Solomon are divine. The famous temple is not juist a building in stone having one single location but is a symbolic reality that can entirely or partially be embedded in different locations. The writers behind Flavius Josephus are making this clear already from the beginning of the story in the Bellum Judaicum, where the temple of Jerusalem is doubled by a copy, the temple of Onias (Iohannes) in Heliopolis in Egypt. So why not also in Spain? The line of your research, going to Cadiz, then Huelva, then Toledo (forgetting Sevilla) and then to the south of France, reveals the symbolic character of entities like the temple of Solomon. Remains, Freiherr, that I agree with you on Spain or rather the Ibru/Hebrew Peninsula as the original Sefarad. Jerusalem surely had a special role in the Ancient World, as appears from the enormous megaliths under the Temple Mount. So had other cities in de region, and the whole region from Egypt to Mesopotamia. But the Ancient Testament, Flavius Josephus, and the unique Jewish temple in Jerusalem that had to be destroyed and replaced by the unique sacrifice of Christ, this are all modern inventions. This is why, from the 16th century on, the templum Salomonis was represented by the Dome of the Rock (for instance in the Sixtine Chapel), as in real history the Dome of the Rock was built by Suleyman (!) the Great. All the actual religious pretentions related to Jerusalem and the environment, are creations from the beginning of modern times, and will not survive modern times (which entered their agony).

 

[Frostychud]

Thanks for this series, you've introduced several ideas that never previously occurred to me and which have caused me to reflect: the Temple as a prison for demons and multiple similar Temple centers around the world, to begin with. I feel dumb for never making the connection between "Hebrews" and "Iberians". More generally, I have long had a suspicion that Spain is massively unerappreciated and under-researched in the Stolen History community. I'm spitballing here, but often I get the feeling that the buck stops with Spain, or rather that going backwards you encounter a cutoff point here. First of all you have the fact that tiny Spain and Portugal supposedly ran South America and at least half of North America (unless it was the other way around). Second of all you have the whole coincidence with the expulsion of the Jews and Columbus both supposedly happening in 1492, which feels fabricated.

Just thinking out loud...was the "expulsion of the Jews" really the releasing of the demons from their prisons due to a cataclysm or war? 1492 is the Big Bang year where Europe is simultaneously invaded by gold from the New World and Sephardic Jews using it to practice usury. The coincidence is too neat and obviously hides something else. I guess that the East India Company founded in 1600 was the continuation under another flag of what must have been a Spanish operation before. We get an occult connection with John Dee supposedly using sorcery to sink the Spanish Armada in 1588, the event which supposedly marked the transfer of sea power from Spain and Portugal to the Netherlands and England. Or maybe the Spanish Armada was just renamed the East India Company and no ships sank. This is all schematic and speculative and I have no larger point, sorry.

ADDED: A different take, but still potentially of interest here: The Hidden History of Solomon’s Temple

EDIT: I see my post went up right after Jef Demolder's far superior contribution, scroll up to read it!

 

[daniboy]

Frostychud mentioned John Dee magically destroying the Spanish armada. There was nothing spectacular about that battle. The English made it seem like a really big deal, because if it had gone well for the Spanish ships, England would have been conquered. The battle was just a disorganized mess. Coordinating the ships landing with the movement of large amount of soldiers from Spanish, Holland didn’t work out. The Armada basically turned back and it did lose a few ships but it didn’t really make much of a dent. I believe a year later, an English armada was actually destroyed off of the coast of Spain.

Did the Spanish armada become the Dutch East India Company? I would love to know more about this. In general, I feel like it’s true that Spain is overlooked and underappreciated in these forms. The official history from the Anglo sphere is very heavy on propaganda that makes Spain look like an incompetent, cruel people. Once the printing press got going, no time was wasted in making Spain look evil… Till today all this propaganda is called the Black Legend. La Leyenda Negra.

 

[Gladius]

Second of all you have the whole coincidence with the expulsion of the Jews and Columbus both supposedly happening in 1492, which feels fabricated.

Just thinking out loud...was the "expulsion of the Jews" really the releasing of the demons from their prisons due to a cataclysm or war?

Half a million Jews were expelled from the Iberian Peninsula together with a great number of Muslims.
Those Jews moved to settle mostly along the North African coast but also in Israel, Greece, Turkey and more.
Many of the families retained their Spanish surnames indicating the place which they came from, for example common names like Toledano and Murciano.

The existence of this huge community is undisputed and well documented in Spain and Portugal and you can still find pre-inquistion Jewish houses there.

There's no evidence that could disprove this community existed and was expelled.
We could however dispute the dates, as is normal for many pre-19th century events.

Just because two big events happened in the same year doesn't make them fraudulent, nor does it indicate they're linked.

1492 is the Big Bang year where Europe is simultaneously invaded by gold from the New World and Sephardic Jews using it to practice usury. The coincidence is too neat and obviously hides something else.

So you suggest it takes less than a year in the non-modern world to discover a new land, colonize it, mine its gold, ship it to Spain, create a Jewish money guild, usurp the country's economy to exhaustion and come up with an expulsion of half a million people. Sounds too neat and obviously hiding something else...

You suggested the 1492 events are fraudlent, but it didn't bother you to treat them as real when you could slap a bit of typical "Jewish usury" on it.
The fact that Muslims were expelled at the same time disproves that claim.

 

[Frostychud]

Hi Gladius. I'd like to start by sharing a KD deep cut discussing the possibility that Columbus actually came in 1592, or rather, that at one point the fake Columbus story was set in 1592 rather than 1492. In any case we have multiple 17th and 18th century sources claiming this (watch the video linked to by Dreamtime in that thread). KD also digs out an old source claiming 1490. At the very least this suggests later tampering.

SH Archive - Columbus "discovered" America in 1592?

From that thread:

A few more examples I found myself on Google Books:

This one says 1488:

Then we have the fact that the New World is full of Colombias, Columbias, etc., not to mention the existence of an Isis-type goddess named Columbia and the punny character of the name Cristobal Colon/Christopher Columbus. There's a 33 there as well (CC = 33). Was the name Columbus and its cognates already present in the New World, and the name and biography of "Christopher Columbus" only fabricated after the fact to explain them all away?

ADDED: Speaking of that magic 33 they like to stick in their fake stories, here's a big fat one I never saw before, from Wikipedia:

"Columbus" drops that 33 in the very first sentence. Go ahead and read the famous letter -- a high school student could have wriiten it in a couple of hours. "Columbus" gives no precise information about anything, other than to get the size of the islands wrong. This jive document was published in Rome, Basel, Paris, and Antwerp. Here are a couple more juicy morsels from Wiki:

So: no manuscript, no information about the voyage itself, no date or location, and multiple conflicting versions...got it.

If we take seriously the hypothesis that the Columbus event was a hoax, we have to ask: why 1492?

First possibility: something important had already happened in 1492, namely the expulsion of the Jews and Muslims, and for whatever reason the history forgers decided to piggyback the fabricated Columbus story onto it.

Second possibility: both of the events as we know them were rewritten, with the date 1492 stuck on both for some other reason, possibly esoteric or numerological.

I almost forgot: 1492 was also the year Martin Behaim supposedly made the first globe (minus the New World). That seems relevant.

Gladius, I gather that you're Israeli, and so I guess you're probably bored and annoyed by the casual and lazy antisemitism that is so often on display here, and in which I engage from time to time. That said, it seems pretty obvious that there is a J€wi$h thread leading roughly from 1400s Venice to 1500s Spain to 1600s Amsterdam to 1700s/1800s England to 1900s USA, with Separdic Jews from Iberia being the driving force behind the East India Companies, the establishment of the Dutch/English/American central banks, the invention of the modern stock market and all its dirty tricks in Amsterdam, the catastrophic economic bubbles, etc.

Since we're talking about a Separdic Jewish conspiracy, check out the following passages from the Wiki entry on the Columbus letter:

So according to Wiki, everyone involved in this scam was part of the same sketchy Converso family. Lots of treasurers and merchants in there, lots of doubled names, and a hint that secret Jewish money partially financed the voyage. I guess these are the people who invented Christopher Columbus.

They couldn't stop themselves from tossing in a little proto-Zionism while they were at it:

I imagine the Spanish Catholicism of the time as being similar to Zionism today. Once Catholicism was created as a world-transforming power machine, Ibri were expected to switch to the updated version of the religion, with Conversos eagerly killing and persecuting those who refused, for the simple reason that they were no longer of use to the occult cabal behind the scenes. I believe Jef Demolder argues that Catholicism was created by the gods as a parting gift to humanity in the 14th century. Here's what I'm imagining: Catholicism, a bastardized ersatz of the original religion of the gods (the Millennial Kingdom of the Saints?), is created by the Fallen Angels with the long-term goal of terraforming the world into a place where they can once again "materialize". I can imagine them sitting around a table like senators hammering out a bill, trying to find a way to merge their individual cults (Judaism, Mithraism, etc.) into one collectively run universal (supposedly that's what "catholic" means) mega-religion. Did some war or cataclysm (10th century? 14th century?) change the Earth in such a way that they could no longer live comfortably here? "We need to band together or else we'll all be eliminated!" In the period leading up to 1492, different groups, perhaps led by different gods/angels, are still fighting for dominance. When Catholicism established itself as the dominant cult in Iberia, the other players -- Jews and Muslims -- had to convert or die, not so much for theological reasons, but because the Fallen Angels seem to really need all of humanity to be formatted into one global hive mind (in order to possess us?), and apparently came to the conclusion that Catholicism was the most effective mind-virus yet for achieving that goal, at least at that stage. A few Jews were permitted to keep the old religion as long as it was hollowed out, occultified (Kabbalah was created in Spain), and subordinated to the Catholic Church as the financial and diplomatic arm of the global operation. Once the Catholic coup was complete (in 1492), the New World (which had been run by Ibri for a long time already) could be rebranded and launched under a new flag. Hence the identity of these two dates.

My guess: Sephardic Ibri had been running the Americas as a colony since the cataclysm (logical considering the location of Iberia) and the deal they were forced to accept by the council who created the new universal religion was something like: you can keep running cross-Atlantic trade, but you have to do it under the Catholic flag, and we have to announce the Americas to the Old World in order to glorify the new Church.

A fake thousand-year history and two new continents: now that's what I call a killer product launch!

Converso spymasters and mercenary commandos like Ignatius Loyola were not "Jews pretending to be Catholics to subvert the Church" as some claim. They were fully on board with the new project. They were probably happy to get in on the ground floor and doubtlessly enjoyed torturing and killing the idiots who wouldn't convert. They were like Michael Jordan balling hard for the Washington Wizards after being lured away from the Chicago Bulls with a better contract. In other words, ALL Spanish Catholics were Conversos in a certain sense, since they must all have been recruited from different private cults.

That's why Jews and Crypto-Jews ran and still run so much global trade: they were given a divine franchise to do so long ago, one that never expired.

EmperorNorton:

The ramifications of scandal from the year before also came to a head in 1492. A year earlier, Spain had been rocked by a political scandal involving the alleged ritual murder of a Christian child by Jews. On Good Friday in the year 1491 the alleged ritual crucifixion of the child known as "La Guardia" took place in Toledo. Great excitement prevailed in the country and it is widely thought that the event gave the government a decisive nudge toward expelling the Jews after that. Torquemada, the head inquisitor, was one of the leading advocates of expulsion. He argued that the alleged murder obligated the monarchs to expel the Jews.

Although Torquemada is ordinarily cast in the role of anti-semitic archvillain, it seems more likely to me that he he was playing the false opposition to help a colonization scheme along--which could mean, for instance, that the murder was staged.

Perhaps this false flag murder was also staged to turn up the heat on Jews and force a sufficient number to convert before the big reboot of Catholicism that had presumably been in the works for some time.

Idea: was Catholicism "tested out" in the New World -- "Cathay" according to "Columbus" -- before being imported to Europe, kind of like brands are tested out in local focus groups before being rolled out globally?

Credit to @emperornorton for most of these ideas. Here's his relevant thread:

1492

(And here's a website run by a Native American historian arguing that most East Coast tribes were actually Sephardic Jews, if I remember correctly from my original perusal):

The Americas Revealed

Did the demons escape from Solomon's prison, corrupt the original religion of the gods (John the Baptist?), seduce a part of the population in Iberia, teach them how to subdue kingdoms through compound interest, and then ride them all the way to Jerusalem? Is this how different groups around the world who had been selected by the Fallen Angels to serve them recognized each other -- mastery of the secret knowledge of usury? Was "Jewishness" not a religion but an initiatic grade?

Is it possible that Exodus tells this story? Was it edited to transpose the action from Spain to Egypt? Or were there multiple similar simultaneous exodus events in different locations after the Fallen Angels escaped from prison? For example, when you de-spin the story of Joseph, what you're left with is nothing but a barely hidden instruction manual on using mind-control (Joseph "interpreting" Pharaoh's dream) to orchestrate a classic market pump and dump and take over a national economy. This is very ugly stuff. Maybe the flight from Egypt was the flight from Spain, with recently unleashed demons (Yahweh being one) seducing different groups into serving them in different ways. He needed an Ark because after escaping his prison tower, which possibly held him in place by feeding him concentrated aetheric energy extracted from the air using the tower, he was just floating around in the atmosphere with no one to feed him delicious burnt offerings.

EDIT: In Andrey Sklyarov's analysis of the Exodus story, he points out that Yahweh basically vanishes as a physically present character after the destruction of Jericho using the Ark and mysterious horn-weapons. He speculates that some sort of tech was hidden in the city, and once the Israelites got it for Yahweh, the big guy didn't really need them anymore. It suddenly occurs to me that maybe Yahweh was using them to break another Fallen Angel out of jail.

We saw that the Conversos behind Columbus tried to use the Columbus hoax to gin up a new Crusade. @Jef Demolder writes, "Jerusalem surely had a special role in the Ancient World, as appears from the enormous megaliths under the Temple Mount."

...is Satan himself (still?) trapped under the Temple Mount?! Is that why the occultists have wormed their way so deeply into Judaism? Was he bound there by such powerful magic that the occultists need to initiate billions of humans into Satanism? To harness their collective spiritual energy and use it to break the spell of binding? Is that the Antichrist's job -- harnessing all that energy and channeling it into the Temple Mount?

Also: See this post, which illustrates a flight from Rome to Siena with too many similarities to the Biblical Exodus story for it to be a coincidence:

SH Archive - Pope is a Liar: #3 Popes and Emperors

Siena and Florence are supposedly the cities where modern banking was invented.

 

[EvilNTT]

Regarding the rollout of Catholicism across the New World like a product launch, consider also the prison planet theory. A forced reincarnation cycle for human souls. The religious programming helps the system create a scenario for you at death where you're ushered by Jesus into a tunnel of light, where your memories are blasted away and you are born into another human life. A huge leap to be sure but worth considering if you need entire populations to suddenly shift their beliefs.

The entire erasing of history, past technologies and civilizations - to be quickly replaced with "new worlds" and a new religion suggests an entire factory reset of the planet, possibly from new ownership.

 

[Gold]

Maybe Salanno on this map was referring to Solomon.

I think either another map, or a book from one of the many I read while trying to figure out who the fuck Marco Polo was, mentioned something about this general region of Arzareth as housing people who kept the names of the tribes like Dan and Nepthali going.

 

[Frostychud]

Miles Mathis just dropped a new paper in which he claims:

- Christopher Columbus was a Jew from Portugal
- His real family name was indeed Colon (which he thinks is a fudge of Cohen) and not Columbus
- He was related to the king of Portugal
- The Genoa origin story is completely fabricated
- Torquemada was Jewish
- The Dominican Order was founded by the billionaire Jewish Guzman family
- The 1492 expulsion of the Jews, which took place of the same day Columbus sailed (!), was a fabricated event
- Martin Behaim was Jewish too and present at the Portuguese court (remember, the guy who made the first globe in...1492, with no New World)

Mathis is rightly considered a suspicious source by many here, but of course that's true of every source out there. We have no choice but to use what we have, calibrate for possible disinformation, and hope the truth sifts out eventually.

There is no way in my mind that the voyage of Columbus and the expulsion of the Jews occurring in the same year, much less the same DAY, is a coincidence. One or both of these events are fabricated.

I am starting to get a better idea of how this might all fit together. I originally speculated that the New World was finally revealed publicly around 1500 because the secret simply could no longer be kept. That may be part of it, but there's an even more logical supposition, namely that the Sephardic Jews running the New World needed manpower from Europe to exterminate the "Indians" and get the old trade routes up and running again. I guess the catastrophe that ended "antiquity" cut the New World off from Europe, and by the time the Jews/"Phoenicians" re-established contact a few decades or centuries later, the remnants of their previous colonies had gone native. Hence the need to use European and African manpower to start all over.

Perhaps the "expulsion of the Jews" could better be described as the Big Jews embedded within the royal families using their brand-new power machine (the Catholic Church, the Inquisition, the Society of Jesus) to force the small Jews to get on board with the new project, leave Iberia, and set up shop in the New World, India, England, the Netherlands, etc. After all, for the scheme to work, a global network of trustworthy Jewish middle managers, merchants, converso priests, supervisors, etc. would be an absolute necessity. A lot of these people probably had no interest in leaving Iberia and had to be pushed.

In other words...the exact opposite of what happened with the founding of Israel, where both European and Arab leaders turned up the heat on the local small Jews (= the stick) and Zionists lured them into Palestine with all kinds of promises (= the carrot). The occult principle of solve et coagula in action, with the 1492 expulsion being an example of "solve" and the 1948 creation of Israel being an example of "coagula".

Meaning that the Columbus and expulsion events of 1492 were indeed two faces of the same psy-op, which feels right to me.

There's something else. I recently learned that the area of the Caucasus where Georgia is now located was once called...Iberia. (There are also locations called "Betlemi", "Betani", "Sioni", etc. in modern Georgia.)

Sounds like bullsh*t to me.

The greatest king in Georgian history, whose statues are everywhere, was named...King David the Builder.

Not only that, the area next to Iberia on the Caspian Sea was called "Albania", which is also strange considering how similar Caucasian culture is to the culture of what we now call Albania (they refer to themselves as the Shqiptar people).

I asked ChatGPT if Lebanon and Albania (both of which share the consonant root LBN) have a related etymology:

What about Albania?

So both refer to mountains, but according to ChatGPT cannot be related. Next I asked it about Albion, the Greek name for Britain, also an LBN name:

So "Alb" means "white" in Proto-Indo-European, and Lebanon refers to white mountains, and Albion refers to white cliffs, but there's no connection with Albania?

It also makes me wonder about albinos.

Just to the north of Iberia and Albania we also find "Amazones" on this 1655 map:

If you look at the northeast part of the map, you see a region called "Asturcani" on the northern coast of the "Mare Hyrcanum" or Caspian Sea. Well, there's a town in Spain called "Astorga" today whose original ("Roman") name was Asturica. According to Wikipedia, "the Asturicani are a tribe mentioned by Ptolemy (v. 9. § 7) as dwelling adjacent to the Pontus Euxinus (Black Sea)." It also looks like "Astrakhan".

Asturcani, Hyrcanum...Canaan? Astrakhan...astro-cani? Star dogs?

I don't know what any of this means, but it's very strange to find the names of three familiar far-flung places (Iberia, Albania, Amazon) stuck together in Asia Minor. We also have "Sarmatia" nearby (compare to Samaria or Sumeria). I have traveled a bit in the region, and the place looks like it was completely wiped out with rock-melting weapons at some point (lots of cave complexes that are pretty obviously melted buildings).

The purely subjective impression I got in Georgia was that it was a place that had been basically nuked, then partially rebuilt in that same red brick "German" style we see everywhere, then buried in mud (Tbilisi looks like a mud flood city), then completely trashed AGAIN by the Soviet Union, leaving it near impossible to figure anything out. I got the feeling that no one really knew anything too concrete about anything before the Soviet Union. The continuity of history we find in Western Europe is missing. For example, in the center of Tbilisi, there is a section of the old brick city ramparts that has been dug out (I would say it's about fifteen feet below street level). A local contact told me that the Soviet Union paved everything over indiscriminately when they arrived in the 1920's and then "everyone forgot about the walls" until they were accidentally rediscovered during road work in 2011. I don't doubt the Soviet Union committed atrocious acts of historicide, but I suspect that something else buried the walls and the Soviet Union only later took the blame in this case, which itself illustrates how confused everything has become.

Georgia (or rather, "Iberia") was supposedly the third country in the world to adopt Christianity (in 337), after Armenia (just to the south) and Axum or Ethiopia. Wine was supposedly invented there. Mount Ararat, where Noah supposedly landed (and planted vineyards), is just on the other side of Armenia. The several old monasteries I visited were nearly indistinguishable in architectural terms from "Romanesque" churches I have visited in Auvergne and Bourgogne in France. My Georgian friend told me that some Georgians consider themselves descendents of the Sumerians who wandered up there from the desert.

I asked my very untrustworthy research assistant, ChatGPT, if there were any Georgian legends or toponyms connected with King Solomon:

Yes, there are legends and toponyms in Georgia that are connected to King Solomon, reflecting the deep cultural and religious ties between Georgia and the broader Biblical tradition. While Georgia is primarily associated with early Christian history, the figure of King Solomon, known for his wisdom and wealth, has also found a place in Georgian folklore and toponymy. Here are some notable examples:

### 1. **Solomon's Throne (Solomonis Tskhovreba)**
- **Location:** There is a mountain in the Kakheti region of Georgia that locals refer to as "Solomon’s Throne" or "Solomonis Tskhovreba."
- **Legend:** According to local legend, King Solomon once sat upon this mountain to judge a dispute between two tribes. This association with King Solomon might be symbolic, reflecting his reputation for wisdom and justice rather than a direct historical connection. The mountain’s name and the legend likely stem from the widespread influence of Solomon’s story throughout the Christian and Islamic worlds, both of which had an impact on Georgian culture.

### 2. **Solomon's Temple Legend**
- **Location:** In the Imereti region, particularly around the city of Kutaisi, which was once the capital of the Kingdom of Imereti.
- **Legend:** There is a local legend that King Solomon’s treasures, including a piece of his fabled temple, were hidden in the caves and underground passages around this area. This belief is part of a broader tradition that sees many regions of Georgia as being linked, symbolically or mystically, to the Holy Land and Biblical figures. While this legend has no historical basis, it reflects the deep cultural respect for King Solomon in Georgian folklore.

### 3. **Toponyms Associated with Solomon**
- **Solomonis Tsikhe (Solomon's Fortress):** In western Georgia, there is a place known as "Solomonis Tsikhe" or "Solomon's Fortress." This name is more metaphorical, as it is unlikely to be directly related to King Solomon. However, the use of Solomon’s name in such toponyms highlights the influence of Biblical narratives on Georgian geography and cultural memory.

### 4. **Solomon’s Mine (Solomonis Shavi Akhali)**
- **Location:** In the Racha region of Georgia.
- **Legend:** This refers to a local legend about a mysterious mine that was supposedly associated with King Solomon. The mine is said to have contained extraordinary wealth, hidden by Solomon’s command. This legend aligns with the broader myths of Solomon's Mines, which are found in various cultures, including in Africa and the Middle East, suggesting a search for the source of Solomon’s vast riches.

### 5. **Sioni Cathedral and King Solomon**
- **Connection:** The Sioni Cathedral in Tbilisi, named after Mount Zion, is occasionally linked in Georgian folklore to King Solomon due to the Biblical connection between Solomon and the Temple of Jerusalem. The cathedral is a symbolic representation of Solomon’s Temple, and legends sometimes elevate Solomon’s wisdom and architectural achievements to inspire the creation of sacred sites in Georgia.

### **Conclusion**
While Georgia does not have a direct historical connection to King Solomon, the figure of Solomon is revered in Georgian folklore, and his legacy is symbolically embedded in the names of certain places and local legends. These toponyms and stories reflect the broader influence of Biblical narratives on Georgian culture, often serving as metaphors for wisdom, justice, and sacredness.

I then asked my research assistant to give me examples of legendary kings in Asia whose "myths" resembled the King Solomon story, and specifically the connection with temples, wisdom, and demons. Well, there are plenty of them all over China, India, Cambodia, Infonesia, etc. I get the feeling that "Solomon" was indeed a title or administrative function and that there were many similar Solomons, Jerusalems, and temples located on ley lines, as the OP claimed.

 

[daniboy]

A quick addition to your observations.

I don't know what any of this means, but it's very strange to find the names of three familiar far-flung places (Iberia, Albania, Amazon) stuck together in Asia Minor.

Galatia (Gaul) is next door in Anatolia.

And Asturias is a very important region in Spain. It is where the hero Pelayo came out of and got the Reconquista going.

Not to mention Galicia is the region next to Asturias. And it has also been said that Portugal is Port of Gaul.

Warm regards.

 

[daniboy]

A quick addition to your observations.

I don't know what any of this means, but it's very strange to find the names of three familiar far-flung places (Iberia, Albania, Amazon) stuck together in Asia Minor.

Galatia (Gaul) is next door in Anatolia.

And Asturias is a very important region in Spain. It is where the hero Pelayo came out of and got the Reconquista going.

Not to mention Galicia is the region next to Asturias. And it has also been said that Portugal is Port of Gaul.

Warm regards.

Andreu Marfull Pujadas has done fabulous work that fills in a lot of holes in Fomonko's reconstruction. He came up with the concept X-185 , as years added between 16-18th centuries. He is Catalan and provides a much needed Iberian perspective. I've brough him up on this platform before....and the more I research his research I feel a very deep satisfaction not only that it really is congruent, but it also seems to have a lovely resolution to the Jewish issue. A peaceful happy solution.

Tell me if you find it to be so for you. Check him out. He's on cronologia.org.

Relevent to the thread here I offer a summary of his research.

2. Reasoned hypothesis that between the 15th and 18th centuries a process of political and symbolic construction takes place with its epicenter in Occitan Gothia, in parallel to the equivalent process that has as its centrality the symbolic capital of Yaroslavl, in the Russian Golden Horde.

Occitan Gothia is sister to Crimean Gothia, where the New Chronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy locates the expansion of the Roman Empire in Eurasia and the origin of Christ.

Thus, these two processes lead, in the second half of the 17th century, to the reconstruction of history in its entirety under Christian rule, sacrificing the Hebrew biblical history of the historical account and sending it to the past.

Moses and the Hebrew people arrive in Occitan Gothia just as Musa Ibn Nusair, the Babylonian Exiliarchs and Charlemagne do in official history, and this process is related to the presence of the New Testament Marys in Provence, and its link with the European monarchies.

In a special way, it is related with Mary Magdalene, who is represented in different figures, such as Eudoxia Komnenos, the grandmother of King James I of Aragon. Along these lines, Occitan Gothia is where the Western counter-power is born, which will end up designing history in the 17th and 18th centuries.

But this initial power is supplanted by new powers from the East, for which Occitan Gothia is sacrificed and in its place Italian Rome and the French, Hispanic, Germanic and English counter-powers flourish.

Thus, a strong archaeological and documentary construction and destruction activity begins that culminates with the work of Joseph Justus Scaliger -Opus de emendatione temporum- with a false date of 1583. In this process, 185 years added are created between the 16th and 18th centuries and a history long in time. In this way, a genealogical transition of the main lineages is created and a historical narrative tailored to the new Christian and messianic worldview. The thesis that develops it is known as Chronology X-185.

 

[daniboy]

Andreu Marfull Pujadas has done fabulous work that fills in a lot of holes in Fomonko's reconstruction. He came up with the concept X-185 , as years added between 16-18th centuries. He is Catalan and provides a much needed Iberian perspective. I've brough him up on this platform before....and the more I research his research I feel a very deep satisfaction not only that it really is congruent, but it also seems to have a lovely resolution to the Jewish issue. A peaceful happy solution.

Tell me if you find it to be so for you. Check him out. He's on cronologia.org.

Relevent to the thread here I offer a summary of his research.

2. Reasoned hypothesis that between the 15th and 18th centuries a process of political and symbolic construction takes place with its epicenter in Occitan Gothia, in parallel to the equivalent process that has as its centrality the symbolic capital of Yaroslavl, in the Russian Golden Horde.

Occitan Gothia is sister to Crimean Gothia, where the New Chronology of Fomenko and Nosovskiy locates the expansion of the Roman Empire in Eurasia and the origin of Christ.

Thus, these two processes lead, in the second half of the 17th century, to the reconstruction of history in its entirety under Christian rule, sacrificing the Hebrew biblical history of the historical account and sending it to the past.

Moses and the Hebrew people arrive in Occitan Gothia just as Musa Ibn Nusair, the Babylonian Exiliarchs and Charlemagne do in official history, and this process is related to the presence of the New Testament Marys in Provence, and its link with the European monarchies.

In a special way, it is related with Mary Magdalene, who is represented in different figures, such as Eudoxia Komnenos, the grandmother of King James I of Aragon. Along these lines, Occitan Gothia is where the Western counter-power is born, which will end up designing history in the 17th and 18th centuries.

But this initial power is supplanted by new powers from the East, for which Occitan Gothia is sacrificed and in its place Italian Rome and the French, Hispanic, Germanic and English counter-powers flourish.

Thus, a strong archaeological and documentary construction and destruction activity begins that culminates with the work of Joseph Justus Scaliger -Opus de emendatione temporum- with a false date of 1583. In this process, 185 years added are created between the 16th and 18th centuries and a history long in time. In this way, a genealogical transition of the main lineages is created and a historical narrative tailored to the new Christian and messianic worldview. The thesis that develops it is known as Chronology X-185.

Hello, everybody. I am here to bother you again and insist that you go check out Andreus Marfull's research.

I admit some of you will have to translate using artificial intelligence from Castilian. Or Catalan into english.

Also for some of you...Maybe it's difficult to get through because it does require a pretty thorough broad knowledge of official history. From the Bible all the way to the 17th century. But it is awesome stuff.

In order to tempt some of you to check it out, I will say some outlandish things that I can say now.

The Basques rule the world.

And Catalonia ? That's where you will find the answers to your Solomon Temple questions. Imagine Barcelona as a hotbed of Knights Templars, Muslim Nasis, and exiled Jewish-Greek princes from the fallen Greek/ Roman Empire. 100's of maps in libraries outside Spain show America covered with Catalan Flags with Leones (Valencia) and some French Fleur-de-lys and Muslim moons! Later Castilian flags.

The Temple of solomon is the covenant, the agreement, the Pax Mongolia, the safe Templar passage, the Silk Roads , etc. And it all is based on Prester John of Abyssina, descendent of Solomon, the Spiritual Power on earth when he marries who? The Ethiopian princess, the Black Madonna you see all over catalonia and Cathar France. Well, the Pope, broke that covenant and replaced the Grail with a messianic Christ.

To this day the Arc of the Covenant is said to be in Ethiopia. It's literally still being protected there.

I saw a picture of Queen Elizabeth of England in the 1960's bowing to the Emperor and Empress of Ethiopia before they were ousted by the commies in the 70's.

There, I hope you are intersted to check out Andreu.

P.S. To this day the King of Spain is The king of Jerusalem!

 

[daniboy]

Oh, I found a good summary on his blog.

European colonization (at the service of the Roman Empire) and the subsequent Economic Imperialism

 

[Frostychud]

Daniboy, on the strength of your suggestion I finally got around to reading through Marfull's entire online archive (about a book's worth of articles dating back to 2016). The Google translate tool renders the Catalan texts into nearly-perfect English (in other words, do not read the poor English translations on the site, but use Google to translate the originals). You're correct, the work is amazing and a must-read. Looking through the SH archives, I see that he was heavily discussed in the early days of the old site. All those threads are worth checking out.

I took a few notes as I read which might be of interest here. In my opinion, Marfull's work, like Fomenko's, needs to be complemented by a more paranoid and conspiratorial view of history. He seems to proceed from the naive premise that kingdoms and empires are something other than slavery machines. There is no trace in his work of the dark side of empire, colonization, and trade such as can be found in the work of Webster Tarpley, Eustice Mullins, Miles Mathis, Michael Hudson, James Scott, David Graeber, and many others. He never writes about money or debt, which is one of the mainsprings of history. He does not seem to consider the inherent tension between land empires and international merchant empires with no allegiance to anyone but their mobile pirate state.

Here's the closest thing I found to a summary of his reconstruction of history:

Going into more detail, from Egypt a civilization was born that expanded through the Middle East to the Mediterranean, Aegean and Black Seas, then began a nomadic journey that reached the Pacific and then returned to its land of origin, the Caucasus, from India, where it came into conflict with the Arab and Greek powers. But from this enterprise another project emerged, that of occupying Europe and then reoccupying the original empire. From Caucasian Iberia and Crimea, called Gothia, the West was occupied, moving the new Gothia, with its headquarters in Avignon, and the new Iberia, to Hispania. From there it rearmed and returned to Greece, whom it defeated, and reoccupied Crimea, Iberia, Georgia and, later, Egypt and Palestine, where he installed Prester John and the Holy Sepulchre of the Great Khan, the leader or great emperor who began the greatest enterprise in the known world, establishing himself as the first great sovereign and, with him, implementing the authority of a single God. The Mamluks would guard this Holy Land from then on, and the Order of the Temple of Solomon the lands won by this lineage, half Hebrew and half imperial. [The idea seems never to occur to Marfull that the Hebrews/Jews are not a "state" like the other states he is investigating, but a merchant/financial/administrative caste associated with a lineage, and which is in constant tension with all of the "land" empires it mediates between.] With all of them, the glory of History, the Genesis of the sacred texts and a great Alliance between the East and the West would be born: the Ark of Solomon which, from then on, by the will of the three Indian kings, would guard Prester John. From there, from the great Babylon (in time known as Cairo, which means "the victorious" in Arabic), the Hebrew people would leave armed with the strength of the tablets of the new Law of Moses, the God Amon transformed into an icon, and would head, alongside the Arab people, back to the two Gothias, establishing different kingdoms and/or khanates there. They would bring there the Ark and the glory of the three Indian kings, whose glory would be honored in Cologne, establishing themselves there as the Three Wise Men. In turn, with them, in the West a great marriage pact would be established, between the daughter of the Priest and a Provençal leader, giving rise to the powers of the Anjou and Aragon, for whom history would build the powers of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the Occitan glory of the Templars and the exploits of the Almogávers, which would in reality be that of the Maccabees and, in turn, that of the Mamluks, who would also be the troops coming from India, and the gypsy people. This would be the original lineage, linked to the Hebrew people, who come from Egypt, from which the great Christian lineages would emerge. From this myth would be born Mary Magdalene and Saint James, and multiple "medieval" works, as well as the Merovingian myth associated, since the twentieth century, with the lineage of Christ. In official history, the arrival of Moses in Europe would come from the chronicle of the leader of Egypt, Musa Ibn Nusair, who reaches France and is defeated by Charles Martel, followed by the expedition of the Jewish Exiliarchs of Babylon and establishing,from Aniana, Christianity -throughout Western Europe- by the hand of the Benedictine Order, since the time of Charlemagne. In other words, official history has duplicated the real events between the eighth and thirteenth centuries, and has eliminated their relationship.

Hanukkà o la festa de les Llums, segons la Cronologia X-185

As you can see, it's dense, poorly written (my biggest criticism of Marfull) and confusing. He is not very good at presenting his information in a coherent, linear way. It appears to be full of internal contradictions as well. That said, if you can make it through a few of his articles, the big picture starts to take shape.

Here's an ultra-simplified version, as I understand it.

Skipping over the Egyptian origins, the story begins around the Black Sea. There is an Empire that worships a great King, Christ. Not Jesus...just Christ. He's not a messiah. He's not God. He's just a king associated with a lineage. Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, etc. do not exist yet as separate religions. There is nothing but an Empire that practices a form of political monolatry associated with a mixed bag of spiritual doctrines which eventually separate out into Buddhism, Stoicism, Gnosticism, Sufism, etc.

The Empire spreads across the known world (Fomenko).

At some point, there is a schism within the empire. The capital city, Constantinople, falls to the Ottomans. What are the Ottomans? They are not "Muslims" yet. They are simply a splinter group which refuses to venerate the descendants of the old imperial lineage. They substitute their new leader, Mohammed, for the old leader, Christ, who again has very little in common with the later fictional "JESUS Christ" character. The old "Christian" empire flees Constantinople and moves west, to Europe.

There are now two competing empires, one proto-Christian in the West, and one proto-Muslim, in the East, both of which trace their origins back to the Black Sea area, and Egypt before that. A pact is concluded between them. This is where Marfull starts delivering the a-ha moments. That pact is the Order of the Temple of Solomon, which is also the order of Prester John. The Ark of the Covenant housed in the Temple is a metaphor for this pact. Their flag is the red cross on the white background. He makes the connection between John and Genoa, and flips it around: the Genoese are not merchants named after the city of Genoa, the city of Genoa (Genova) is named after the itinerant "knights" of John who mediate global trade between the divided empire. Of course! (Note as well that the city of Geneva would be nothing but a later iteration of the city of Genova, which is directly south and not far at all. Again, of course!) Genova = John = Janus = Noah. Marfull argues that the Temple of Solomon and the Ark of the Covenant are symbols of a pact concluded between these two imperial entities, East and West (loosely speaking). The Templars are the intermediaries who enforce this pact internationally. Keep in mind that at this point we still don't have Muslims, Christians, and Jews exactly.

Check out this 1546 Joao Freire map. Wow. Three things stand out. First, only two cities in the entire western Mediterranean are depicted as important: Genoa and Venice but NOT Rome. Second, Genova is spelled "Ienova". Third, the N's are all written backwards! How on Earth do professional historians explain all this? How can you claim that the Pope ruled Christendom from Rome when period maps treat Rome as just another minor city, at best the third power of Italy? Was Rome a later compromise between Genoa and Venice?

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

 

[Frostychud]

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

Here is where we need to insert the more conspiratorial elements that Marfull does not engage with. He seems to see the Genoese/Templars/Solomonic Order (they have a million names) as a kind of neutral diplomatic body traveling around the Mediterranean/Black Sea rim upholding the pact of John. But what if he has it backwards? There is nearly unlimited power to be gained from this middle position. Webster Tarpley and the Schiller Institute assign this role to "Venice". They show how Venetian merchants weaponized the East/West divide by introducing a silver standard in the East and a gold standard in the West, then simply going back and forth along trade routes that they monopolized, exchanging gold for silver in the West, and silver for gold in the East, earning a huge margin on both ends. They became fabulously wealthy this way, and were soon in a position to become the private financiers of every empire in their orbit. Through the black magic of compound interest, they were able to essentially conquer everyone without a fight. The economic historian who goes by the name of "Mefobills" at Unz.com points rather to the "Habiru" or proto-Hebrew donkey caravaneers who ran the East-West (Silk Road) trade routes, later known as Radhanite Jews. Here I should also add that it suddenly makes perfect sense that we have TWO Iberias, one at the Eastern edge of the sea rim (today's Georgia), and one at the Western edge (Spain and Portugal). One is as close as you can get to the riches of India and China by ship, the other is as close as you can get to the riches of the New World by ship. Habiru = Hebrew = Ibri = Iberia. These were the two edges of the sea trade routes! Also, Venetians = Phonecians.

Every kingdom becomes dependent on these merchants, as only an international, cosmopolitan body which can operate above the multiple laws of the land is capable of keeping the global network running. There is no way around them! Here's an excellent article from the Schiller Institute illustrating how "Venice" rigged the first global financial collapse by trapping every one of their client empires in debt. Ignore the chronology and just read it to understand the method.

Venice Rigged Global Financial Collapse

The scholar and critic of Judaism, Chris Jon Bjerknes, argues that Jews use "Leviathan" and "Behemoth" (Book of Job) as code words for Christendom and Islam, and that the long-term plan has always been to use one to destroy the other and usher in the Messianic Era in which Israel takes final control of the entire Earth. It sounds paranoid, but if we understand that today's "Jews" are just one of the splinter groups (along with, for example, today's Swiss) tracing their origins back to this original trade organization, it makes sense. These people had hundreds of years to master all the dirty tricks, codify their entire system of economic exploitation, and encrypt it in their "holy" texts. See also the episode of Joseph and Pharaoh in which Joseph runs a pump and dump scam on Egypt. The OT is basically a pirate textbook.

Leviticus Rabbah 13:3:

Behemoth and the Leviathan are to engage in a wild-beast contest before the righteous in the Time to Come, and whoever has not been a spectator at the wild-beast contests of the heathen nations in this world will be accorded the boon of seeing one in the World to Come. How will they be slaughtered? Behemoth will, with its horns, pull Leviathan down and rend it, and Leviathan will, with its fins, pull Behemoth down and pierce it through.

This mumbo-jumbo is clearly code for some kind of political plan. All you have to do is watch a few YouTube videos of creepy orthodox rabbis talking about this stuff as they rock back and forth slyly grinning to understand that there is nothing "spiritual" here, just encrypted politics.

So, back to Marfull. He argues that during the time of Prester John, a Jewish kingdom emerges in northeastern Spain and southern France, with Narbonne as its capital. He argues that the "pope" in Avignon is still basically a Jewish authority at this time. Again, (messianic) Christianity has not been invented yet. This "Jewish" kingdom would simply be one ruled by a proto-Talmudic international legal system and trace its origins back to Egypt via the Black Sea. (For Marfull, Cathars = Khazars = proto-Jews.) These are people with a divine lineage and a law.

Marfull's hesitancy to engage in conspiratorial thinking confuses him. He suggests that Genghis Khan and King David are the same character, and makes David the founding king of the Jews. Here he is obligated to invert Biblical chronology. Since he has only one cognitive model for the genesis of an empire and a lineage, the Gentile model, he argues that David must have come before Moses, whom he identifies as Musa Ibn Nusair, the 7th century Muslim conqueror of Spain (he situates these events much later). He conspicuously ignores all of the Biblical episodes involving Abraham, Isaac, and Joseph, which show clearly that before the Hebrews were a kingdom, they were a confederation of itinerant merchants belonging to different tribes. Abraham is a powerful warlord, slaver, and pirate. In other words, the Bible clearly shows us that there was a moment in history in which the Hebrews evolved from being a wandering merchant empire to a landed empire with a king (which was later lost). Following this conceit, Spain, or Sfarad, would be the first Jewish kingdom proper.

Remember, the proto-Jews at this time are not like other people. They are a loose, multi-ethnic imperial caste composed of people occupying multiple different yet related imperial functions. Their lineage is professional and symbolic more than strictly genetic. It's also hard for me not to see a connection between "Judaism" and all the Latin words relating to judgment, judicial, etc. (They actually rub it in our faces with television shows like Judge Judy, in which a righteous multimillionaire Jewish judge tries and punishes degenerate, impoverished, beastlike goyim.) Was the "Jewish kingdom" simply the base of operations of the administrators, judges, lawyers, scholars, merchants, diplomats, etc. of the double empire? The refusal to "worship a graven image" takes on a different meaning here. Perhaps it should simply be interpreted as: the judicial class must remain impartial and refuse allegiance to any of the various (political) icons "worshiped" by the various people who made up the Empire. The Law (again, the proto-Talumd, at that point not yet distinct from the Roman and Byzantine legal codes which all resemble each other) must be applied impartially. Was Spain their first Zion, their first successful attempt to phase-shift from a global trade mafia to a landed kingdom? No wonder they hate the Catholic Church so much.

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

 

[Frostychud]

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

This allows us to reinterpret the story of King Solomon binding the 72 demons with his ring and forcing them to construct his temple. 70 and 72 are numbers that stand in, esoterically, for "the totality" in the Bible, and in particular for the total number of nations.

https://www.chabad.org/kabbalah/article_cdo/aid/380598/jewish/Creation-and-the-Name-of-72.htm

So perhaps the seventy-two bound "demons" simply represent the (financially enslaved) nations. The seal of Solomon or Star of David is composed of two superimposed triangles, with the esoteric signification being a balance of opposites (male and female). Even the name "Solomon" is just the words for sun and moon stuck together, again implying a balance of opposites. Well, suddenly it makes sense. The original esoteric idea of balancing inner forces in order to master nature and oneself has been hijacked and overwritten to convey a purely practical/political/financial technique, that of weaponizing the middle against the edges. "King Solomon" "balances the opposites" by pitting one half of the empire against the other half and positioning himself exactly at the middle; he "commands the seventy-two demons to build him a temple", i.e. drains the resources of the Gentile nations to construct a merchant empire. Think of Switzerland, the neutral center of Europe draining the gold of all the surrounding nations (to this day). The Rothschild family is "Solomon", inasmuch as they have mastered the art of fomenting war, making loans to both sides, and ultimately controlling everything. Anecdotally it is in fact due to their influence that the occult symbol of the six-pointed star ended up on the Israeli flag.

Marfull claims that this Solomonic pact lasts about two hundred years, and finally collapses in 1453 (which would actually be 1638 in his revised x-185 chronology). There is a period of chaos, and from that chaos emerges a new imperial project, this time organized around the brand-new fictional figure of the new crucified messianic Christ, Jesus, launched in 1492 (= 1677). This character was constructed with bits and pieces of every religious or spiritual system out there in an attempt to appeal to everybody. He was made childless to announce the end of the Davidian (Solomonic, Templar, Jewish) line, which would now be under the authority of a new figure, the Pope, a combination of Prester John and the proto-Jewish Avignon rabbi-popes. This new syncretic religion, which was above all a new political order with imperial ambitions, was then equipped with a new chronology and shopped around the world by the Jesuits, who offered a deal that went something like: "accept the universal authority of the new international empire and we'll get your shipping lanes back open pronto as well as finance your palace and secret police. We'll even throw in a harem of blonde Scythian girls as a signing bonus. You can keep your throne and your history, you just have to project it backwards in time to fill out our new chronology."

Here it's worth quickly touching on Marfull's theory about Christopher Columbus, which is brilliant. He suggests that in the aftermath of the breakdown of the Empire in 1453 (again, 1638), the Jewish kingdom in Spain made a move to take over the global trade network, sending the Sephardic prince Columbus to capture the (secret) Templar outpost in the Caribbean. Marfull traces Columbus back to the noble Byzantine Kalonymos lineage (Colon, Colom, etc.). According to Marfull, there was therefore a period in which the Jewish kingdom of Sfarad ran the New World, only to be later ousted by the Catholic Church, a project which was conceived by (among others) a breakaway faction of the SAME family, the famous papal Colonnas of Rome. Colonna family - Wikipedia In other words, there was a schism within the Jewish kingdom of Sfarad, which resulted in the creation of the Catholic Church, which then dedicated itself to erasing its own Jewish past and persecuting all cousin Jews who refused to get on board with the new empire. Columbus was rewritten as a Catholic and the pre-Columbian history of Templar exploitation of the New World as a resource extraction colony was erased.

(See the post of @Starfire arguing that Cherokees can trace their origins back to Sephardic Jews who were present before Columbus: Jews and Muslims in British Colonial America)

The Taula de Canvi of Barcelona, called by Wiki the "first-ever central bank", was also co-directed by one Guillem Colom, in 1401...

Marfull therefore sees the birth of the Catholic Church as the end of Jewish and Templar power. But here the paranoid conspiracy theorists have something to say. For Marfull, the Catholic project was conceived to convert the entire world, and ultimately failed for organic reasons. But what if it were actually designed to fail, or was at the very least nudged in that direction by those Jews who refused to get on board with the new project, or only converted under duress? There is this idea out there that Jews created both Christianity and Islam with the goal of playing one off against the other and profiting from the conflict. Well, there's a certain logic here. Both Islam and the new Christianity were injected at some point with the idea of a Judgment Day and a World to Come under the leadership of some messianic figure. They were also made into absolute existential enemies. It doesn't seem too far-fetched to me that this might be the fanatical project of a betrayed middleman faction fantasizing about one day subduing the entire world openly in an orgy of revenge. They were almost there, with Columbus, but the new Catholic Church snatched it from them at the last moment. To achieve their subversive goal, they take the old unified world religion, which is basically just loyalty to a lineage coupled with a variety of different spiritual practices, and they create (with the "wisdom of Solomon") two new "religions" out of it, Catholicism and Islam, both of which are installed with self-destruct mechanisms that can be triggered at any time (Judgment Day). From this moment forward, it's game on. The goal is to centralize power until the material conditions are ripe for the red button to be pushed and the two transitional religions of Christianity and Islam to be imploded like the Twin Towers and absorbed into a new One World system. Actually, the 9/11 ritual, scripted and pulled off by Israel, makes more sense in this light. Was this Israel announcing to the world that it was time for Leviathan and Behemoth finally to be merged into a one world commercial/political order ruled from the center, Jerusalem? One of the biggest hurdles to accepting the thesis of people like Bjerknes, namely that the Jews have been planning this since Biblical times, lies precisely in the impossible time scale. What kind of dumb plan takes two thousand years to execute? However, a loose plan first scripted 350 years ago, based on sound, proven principles, which is constantly being updated and rewritten in real time, as well as constantly generating profit, is not so hard to believe. "Christianity" and "Islam" have today been updated into the two blocs we see being pitted against each other today, namely "The West" and the BRICS countries. And every time they fight...like Russia and Ukraine...a titanic amount of money is siphoned off from both sides and directed into the pockets of the people orchestrating the conflicts from the neutral center. We see the same technique in American politics, where the populace has been divided into two camps, red and blue, which are somehow always neck and neck.

The people pulling this off today appear to have a double identity as well, half Jewish and half "Templar" (European aristocracies associated with occultism). Well, this makes sense too when we realize that before 350 years ago, such hard distinctions didn't even exist yet. These people were all just pirates, and they are still pirates.

Here it's worth going over Marfull's interpretation of the signification of the number twelve. We've all puzzled over the ubiquity of this number: twelve signs of the zodiac, twelve tribes of Israel, twelve apostles of Jesus, etc. Well, Marfull has the brilliant intuition to put them in a sequence, a kind of Hegelian dialectical triad. The number first appears with the Egyptian zodiac as a symbol of a spherical, unified world in which everything has a cosmically fixed place. It is the symbol of the timeless Egyptian political order. At some point, that order is smashed, and the twelve signs of the zodiac go wandering off in the form of twelve tribes. This is the moment of chaos. When Jesus is introduced, the twelve wandering tribes return to their place, with Jesus at the center (thesis/antithesis/synthesis). In other words, Pharaoh/King Arthur has been killed and after a period of reorganization replaced with an impostor/traitor (the messianic Jesus) who can be puppeteered from behind the scenes. Remember as well that the priestly Levites are a thirteenth tribe, qualitatively different from the other twelve, and indeed ruling them through taxation and mind control despite having no land of their own. What I see here is another metaphor for the system described earlier, in which an outside element shatters a primordial/mythical balanced order and inserts itself into the center, from which it can control the subordinates parasitically. Is this why the secret societies love the number 13? Isn't this just a mythologized version of the method used to this day by subversives and detailed in the Protocols? Basically, insert your own people in undercover roles until the host political order is captured and under mafia control?

 

[Frostychud]

Note: please read the entire thread and in particular my three previous posts before reading this, as it will not make sense otherwise.

Marfull's hypothesis that northeastern Spain and southern France were proto-Jewish kingdoms before 1492 (conventional chronology) keeps leading me to interesting places I wasn't expecting to go.

I was recently reminded of the incredible Israeli general and history forger Yigael Yadin, who had the chutzpah to lead a well-poisoning campaign in Palestine in 1948 called "Operation Cast Thy Bread". He's also the guy who oversaw the forging of the fake Bar Kokhba letters. Imagine: after six hundred years of denying accusations that you caused the black plague by poisoning wells, and finally more or less convincing everybody that you're innocent, the very first thing you do when you get your own country again is go poison the wells of people whom you want to expel!

Question: is it possible that the Black Plague and the Bar Kokhba Revolt are connected? Did the Bar Kokhba Revolt actually happen, but somewhere in Spain or France, and sometime in the last five hundred years, not during the fake 2nd century? According to standard chronology, the second temple fell in 70 AD and the Bar Kokhba Revolt began in 132 AD. Well, if we equate the loss of the Jewish Kingdom of Spain/France/Germany to the Roman Catholic Church in 1492 with the destruction of the second temple by Rome, that would put the Bar Kokhba revolt sometime after that, in the 16th century. I prefer not to worry too much about exact dates because we know they're fake anyway. Marfull appears to think we can recalibrate these dates by adding either 185 or 370 years. That seems too easy, but I will keep these rough figures in mind.

Hypothesis: the Black Plague was indeed caused by Jews (and others, we'll get to that) poisoning the wells of Christians, and it happened in the context of the conflict between the new Catholic Church and and the old proto-Jewish kingdom in Spain, France, northern Italy, and western Germany.

- Let it be noted that we have no proof that the disease they call the plague today has anything in common with the "real" Black Plague, whose symptoms were apparently quite different. We have no idea what the actual Black Plague was. We do know that malnutrition can cause skin diseases like beriberi and pellagra, as referenced here: SH Archive - Black Plague (Black Death Hoax)

- We also know that Jews have used the weapon of famine against their enemies ever since Joseph cornered the grain market in Egypt and starved the populace for seven years in order to seize control of the economy. They did it to Ireland in the 1800's, to Ukraine in the 1930's (Holodomor) and to Germany after the war (Eisenhower's starvation camps). And of course they're doing it again right now in Palestine. Famines are great because they're easy to blame on climatic factors, and they're a choice way to kill a lot of Gentiles at once. The Schiller Institute article I linked to a few posts back argues that the Black Plague was caused by famine due to financial manipulation by "Venice". That's code for Jews. Read the article if you haven't already.

- We are told that accusations of well-poisoning first began in 1321 in France. For the rest of this post, I will be referring to the following article by Tzafir Barzilay, who wrote a book in 2022 called Poisoned Wells: Accusation, Persecution, and Minorities in Medieval Europe, 1321-1422. I will also be quoting from the book's Introduction. Please read the article before continuing.

The Making of a Conspiracy Theory | Tzafrir Barzilay

Barzilay happens to be from Israel. So, the author of the definitive book debunking the "conspiracy theory" that Jews poisoned wells is himself an Israeli Jew. Something tells me that the crack team at Bar-Ilan University is not going to look too hard at the contemporary accounts of the plague universally attributing it to biological warfare waged by Jews against Christians. It's almost as if Barzilay could be suspected of being a propagandist for the tribe he belongs to. Let's look at his detailed refutation of the claim:

So the starting point of his analysis is the axiomatic premise that the accusations are all false. The chutzpah always amazes me.

I hate to beat the same old dead horse, but the problem is that the horse isn't actually dead. The scholars cited here as authorities on the subject by Barzilay include a Trachtenberg, a Ginzburg, a Guerchberg, and a Nirenberg. Trachtenberg, the first source he cites, is a literal rabbi and "ardent Zionist". David Nirenberg "is notable for his landmark analysis in 2013 of antijudaism as a constitutive principle of the Western tradition." This is all from Wikipedia. Was the entire literature on the subject written by Jewish zealots, or just the main books he cites?

With that caveat out of the way, I want to look at some of the information Barzilay presents in the article linked to above, because it is juicy once you despin it, and often Barzilay himself seems not to know what he is looking at, for the simple reason that he is stuck in conventional chronology.

From the Introduction: It was not the Jews who were the first minority to be systematically accused of well poisoning, but the lepers of France and Aragon, who were attacked much more often than Jews in 1321.

That's a big nonbarking dog.

In spring and summer 1321, the systematic persecution of lepers and Cagots was under way, mostly in southwestern France and in Aragon.

Okay, what the hell is a Cagot? We'll get to that.

The next paragraph is what caused the light bulb to go off in my head:

Chroniclers concur that the lepers were executed specifically because they poisoned water sources. A chronicle from Tours states that it was agreed “that these lepers would put poison in fountains and wells, so that Christians who drink or otherwise consume the water would die an early death.”

Do you see that? That line from the Tours chronicle logically suggests that "lepers" were not Christians.

A chronicle from Paris adds that the lepers, “following a great deliberation in several assemblies held over a long time, created deadly poisons to be administered and given to all people not infected by their sickness, in diverse manners. It was known that they put them in wells, in fountains, in wines, in wheat, and in other things necessary for the sustenance of men and women, so that all of those who would use or drink or eat these poisons will either die or lose their mind and be infected by [the lepers’] illness.”

I love catching these guys cheating in real time like this. See the way Barzilay interpolates [the lepers'] before the word "illness"? Why does he do that? Because he is proceeding from the assumption that the sickness from which the lepers suffer is the same illness they are inoculating in the populace. But look again. The lepers are infected by a sickness, but they are attempting to transmit an illness. Unfortunately we don't have the original text, but I suppose two different words were used there.

Hypothesis: leprosy was not an illness, it was a code word for a type of heresy.

This is why Barzilay has to alter the text. Otherwise it makes no sense. The "sickness" of the lepers is political or religious, not physical. They are NOT trying to pass on their own (moral) "sickness" to the Christians, they are simply trying to poison them. (Alternate possibility: the entire Black Plague story is a grand coverup for a huge war of depopulation.)

Barzilay almost admits that lepers were not what we imagine them to be today. The place of lepers in medieval culture was ambiguous: on the one hand, they were entitled to protection and charity; on the other, their disease was described as particularly vile and impure. This ambiguity stemmed from the idea that leprosy was not an ordinary disease, but one that carried symbolic, and even religious, meanings.

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

 

[Frostychud]

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

Suddenly the entire history of lepers in Europe makes potentially more sense. There is no way that this hypothesis has not been examined somewhere before, and it probably deserves its own thread here. This would explain why lepers are invariably presented as a special category of property-owning, politically organized outcasts. I mean, think about it. If my limbs were rotting off and I were exiled to the outskirts of town with other moribunds, I don't think I would be raising guerilla teams to wage war against the townspeople.

Note as well that Michel Foucault develops a similar theme in Madness and Civilization:

"According to Foucault, modern mad people assumed the role of medieval lepers and even occupied lepers' institutional space. The striking image of the empty leprosarium is the first in a succession of images of madness from which Foucault constructs his history of insanity."

If we tweak Foucault's analysis by decoding "leper" as "persecuted remnant of the old politico-religious order", he is basically saying what has been argued here so many times, namely that the comically overbuilt "insane asylums" everywhere were repurposed to house post-Reset dissidents. (You would be surprised how close a lot of these 60s-70s French intellectuals like Foucault, Debord, Deleuze, Baudrillard, Lacan, etc. get to the themes discussed on Stolen History. Baudrillard even wrote a book called "The Gulf War Did Not Take Place.")

Well what about the disease itself? From the Wikipedia entry on leprosy:

Recent research has shown M. leprae [Hansen's Disease or leprosy] has maintained a similarly virulent genome over at least the last thousand years, leaving it unclear which precise factors led to leprosy's near elimination in Europe by 1700.

A mystery indeed! Maybe it's because whatever heretical group went under the code name "lepers" was eradicated then, or folded into some other outsider group...like the Jews?

- Then we have the weird fact that there was an entire crusading order dedicated to serving and protecting lepers, the Order of Saint Lazarus, which was established to care for lepers in Crusader Jerusalem and subsequently operated other leprosaria around Europe.. Order of Saint Lazarus - Wikipedia

Although they were centred on their charism of caring for those afflicted with leprosy, the knights of the Order of Saint Lazarus notably fought in the Siege of Acre in 1191, Arsuf, in the Battle of Jaffa in 1192, the Battle of La Forbie in 1244, and in the Defense of Acre in 1291.

What? So these guys dedicate their lives to building hospitals for lepers around the world (only lepers, mind you, no other disease interests them), but then gear up to go kill infidels from time to time?

- On their own website they write, 1244 Battle of Gaza - all the leper knights of the house of Saint Lazarus were killed. Leper knights? So they themselves were "lepers"? This makes no sense at all.

- Wikipedia again: In 1489, Pope Innocent VIII attempted to merge the order and its land holdings with the Knights Hospitaller. This was resisted by the larger part of the jurisdictions of the Order of Saint Lazarus.

Remember, Marfull argues that the 1307 decapitation of the Templars by the Catholic King of France actually occurred in 1492 in the context of the hostile Catholic takeover of the old proto-Jewish trade empire. And here in 1489 we have the Catholic Pope attempting to fold the Order of Saint Lazarus into the Knights Hospitaller. Did all these events occur around the same time?

- Hypothesis: the Order of Saint Lazarus was NOT originally a Catholic organization (the Catholic Church didn't exist yet), but one of the many imperial trade order franchises that dominated international commerce before the Catholic coup of 1492 detailed by Marfull. Were the Knights Hospitaller the later "Catholicized" version of the Order of Saint Lazarus? Did some of the original members refuse to get on board with the new system? Notice that the Lazarites have a green cross, which immediately connects us with Islam, whereas the Hospitallers have the familiar red and white cross.

- Remember, Marfull suggests that before "1492" (actually 1677 according to him, but I am sticking with conventional chronology in this post for the sake of legibility) there was no Catholic Church yet, just various different splinter kingdoms and orders that were all heirs of the original empire, fragmented into two main blocs which would later become "Catholicism" and "Islam", with Jews crucially mediating between the two halves (see my previous few posts).

With this idea in mind, namely that "lepers" are actually some group loyal to the old Imperial/Jewish order, let's take a look at the other accused well poisoners mentioned above, namely the Cagots.

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST

 

[Frostychud]

(CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST)

So, what are CAGOTS?

Cagot - Wikipedia

The Cagots (pronounced [ka.ɡo]) were a persecuted minority who lived in the west of France and northern Spain: the Navarrese Pyrenees, Basque provinces, Béarn, Aragón, Gascony and Brittany. Evidence of the group exists as far back as 1000 CE. The name they were known by varied across the regions where they lived. The Cagots were not a distinct ethnic or religious group, but a racialised caste. They spoke the same language as the people in an area and generally kept the same religion as well, with later researchers remarking that there was no evidence to mark the Cagots as distinct from their neighbours.[45] Their only distinguishing feature was their descent from families long identified as Cagots.[46] The origins of the Cagots remain uncertain, with various hypotheses proposed throughout history. Some theories suggest they were descendants of biblical or legendary figures cursed of God, or the descendants of medieval lepers, while others propose they were related to the Cathars or even a fallen guild of carpenters. Some suggest descent from a variety of other marginalized racial or religious groups. Despite the varied and often mythical explanations for their origins, the only consistent aspect of the Cagots was their societal exclusion and the lack of any distinct physical or cultural traits differentiating them from the general population. The discriminatory treatment they faced included social segregation and restrictions on marriage and occupation. Despite laws and edicts from higher levels of government and religious authorities, this discrimination persisted into the 20th century.

So no one knows what they are. Maybe they are the "descendants of lepers". Maybe they are Cathars. Remember, Marfull thinks that Cathars = Khazars = Black Sea proto-Jews refractory to the Catholic takeover. I once stayed in an old stone house in the Lozère region of southern France. The owner explained to me that the house was built by Cathar silk merchants and had been heavily damaged during the Cathar purges (he rebuilt it himself). There were old Cathar churches everywhere in the region.

The origins of both the term Cagots (and Agotes, Capots, Caqueux, etc.) and the Cagots themselves are uncertain.

What is clear is that there is a persistent connection between Cagots and lepers.

In modern French, "Cacou" and "Cagole" are somewhat derogatory terms for a certain kind of vulgar proletarian found exclusively in the south of France. Here is a photograph from a play called "Un Cacou, Une Cagole":

- From the following text, called "Caquins de Bretagne", published in 1904:
https://bibliotheque.idbe.bzh/data/cle_353/Les_Caquins_de_Bretagne.pdf

Until the 17th century, the people regarded the Cagots with extreme aversion, claiming that they were descended from Jews and that they are all infected with hereditary leprosy." At the same time, they were in the possession of a "hereditary right to the houses they occupied in the leprosia (maladreries), and were accorded certain property exemptions by the duke".

This is all very strange. From Wiki again:

Antoine Court de Gébelin derives the term cagot from the Latin caco-deus, caco meaning "false, bad, deceitful", and deus meaning "god", due to a belief that Cagots were descended from the Alans and followed Arianism.

Remember, Marfull tells us that Isaac Newton traced the origin of the Catalans to the Caucasian Alans (Chatti-Alans, Hittite-Alans), and now we see that their neighbors the mysterious "Cagots" might also be Alans. So once again we're hovering over the target. As for Arianism, it appears to be one of those creeds that dates back to the time when the primordial imperial religion had not yet separated out into Judaism, Islam, and Christianity. In other words, the Cagots appear to be remnants of the old empire, who were accorded certain rights up to a certain point.

One of the earliest recorded mentions of Cagotes is in the charters of Navarre, developed around 1070.[54] Another early mention of the Cagots is from 1288, when they appear to have been called Chretiens or Christianos.[7][45] Other terms seen in use prior to the 16th century include Crestias, Chrestia, Crestiaa[38] and Christianus,[25] which in medieval texts became inseparable from the term leprosus [!], and so in Béarn became synonymous with the word leper.[55] Thus, another theory is that the Cagots were early converts to Christianity, and that the hatred of their pagan neighbors continued after they also converted, merely for different reasons.[50]

- So now they are proto-Christians, and we see that the word "Christian" was originally synonymous with the word "Leper". What the hell? This links them again to the Cathars, who remember were persecuted by the Catholic Church for their heretical gnostic version of Christianity:

Catharism (/ˈkæθərɪzəm/ KATH-ər-iz-əm;[1] from the Ancient Greek: καθαροί, romanized: katharoí, "the pure ones"[2]) was a Christian quasi-dualist and pseudo-Gnostic movement which thrived in Southern Europe, particularly in northern Italy and southern France, between the 12th and 14th centuries.

Sounds similar to Manicheanism/Zoroastrianism, which again makes more sense if we (1) associate the Cathars with remnants of an old Imperial order based in the East and (2) abolish the artificial thousand-year gap between them.

The next paragraph from the Wikipedia entry on Cagot takes us even deeper:

Another possible explanation of their name Chretiens or Christianos is to be found in the fact that in medieval times all lepers were known as pauperes Christi, and that, whether Visigoths or not, these Cagots were affected in the Middle Ages with a particular form of leprosy or a condition resembling it, such as psoriasis. Thus would arise the confusion between Christians and Cretins,[7] and explain the similar restrictions placed on lepers and Cagots. Guy de Chauliac wrote in the 14th century,[56] and Ambroise Paré wrote in 1561 of the Cagots being lepers[53] with "beautiful faces" and skin with no signs of leprosy, describing them as "white lepers" (people afflicted with "white leprosy").[30][48][57] Later dermatologists believe that Paré was describing leucoderma.[41] Early edicts apparently refer to lepers and Cagots as different categories of undesirables,[50] With this distinction being explicit by 1593.

So we now have a connection with white skin and "beautiful faces". They are "lepers without leprosy". Perhaps the white skin and beautiful faces have something to do with the Cathar ideal of moral perfection? You have to love the line: "Later dermatologists believe that Pare was describing leucoderma". The incredible hoops these people have to jump through to rationalize their theories! Leucoderma is a benign condition affecting 1% of the population at random, across ethnic groups. Do you see how stupid they think we are? And how stupid they have to make themselves not to see beyond this nonsense?

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST​

 

[Frostychud]

CONTINUED FROM PREVIOUS POST

So to sum up, the Cagots were social outcasts of uncertain origin, anecdotally suspected of descending from lepers, or Jews, or Cathars, or Alans, no one knows, and who nonetheless kept certain inherited property rights, They were also associated with physical beauty and white skin. We see as well that the famous "Cretins" of the Alps might be the same people, retroactively rewritten as people suffering from a disease. Note: I am not saying that Hansen's Disease, leucoderma, or cretinism (caused by an iodine deficiency) are not real conditions, simply that they have been used as cover stories to erase different groups of people who had to be written out of history after the Catholic Church took over.

Again, from Caquins de Bretagne:

"In our time [1904], we see the remnants of an unnamed nation, "vanquished around the time of the fall of the Roman Empire".

Wow. Again, we suspect that the "Roman Empire" was a later fabrication designed to cover up the real Empire, which had its origins in the Black Sea region, and Egypt before that.​

Let's go back to Barzilay's article:

Bernard Gui, the senior inquisitor in Toulouse, was convinced of the lepers’ guilt: “Since the lepers were plotting against the public health, and were unhealthy in body and insane of mind, they arranged to infect the water of rivers, springs, and wells everywhere. They did so by placing in them drugs, poisons, and toxins made into powders, so healthy people, by drinking or using the water, will be infected so that they become lepers or die, or will be destroyed from the inside. In this manner, the number of lepers will increase and that of the healthy people will decline.” Accounts from Uzerche and Cahors, like Bernard, agree with the northern chroniclers: the lepers conspired to kill healthy Christians or turn them into lepers, and were therefore arrested and executed.

First of all, Hansen's Disease does not cause "insanity". Second of all, why would lepers want to infect other people? None of this makes sense unless you see "leprosy" as code for heresy.

The next passage is worth copying at length, because it reveals so much.

This is full of neat puzzle pieces.

First of all, we have an eclipse day. What do you want to bet the later history forgers retro-calculated that day and included the eclipse to give their artificially backdated story some pseudo-objective support?

These suspicions may have been related to well-poisoning accusations, which were already widespread.

"May have been"...in other words, Barzilay is attempting to hypnotize us into seeing nothing but dumb superstitious goys who believed they "saw a dragon" (stupid antisemitic medieval peasants haha they never bathe haha they believe in magic dragons haha) killing innocent Jews for no reason.

What's next is extra juicy. Check out the deal the Jews have made with the Muslims. They will hire the lepers to poison the Christians so that the Muslims can invade Anjou...IF the Muslims return the Holy Land to them. How many times have we seen this precise schema?

Remember, the Sephardic prince Christopher Columbus wanted to raise an army to reconquer the Holy Land. From a letter to the Catholic Monarchs of March 4, 1493:

I conclude here: that through the divine grace of He who is the origin of all good and virtuous things, who favors and gives victory to all those who walk in His path, that in seven years from today I will be able to pay Your Highnesses for five thousand cavalry and fifty thousand foot soldiers for the war and conquest of Jerusalem, for which purpose this enterprise was undertaken. And from a letter to the Pope in 1503: This enterprise was undertaken with the purpose of expending what was invested in aiding the holy temple and the holy Church. Take note of the language here: the holy temple AND the holy Church. What temple is he talking about? Remember, Columbus' probable ancestor Guillem Colom, probable descendant of the Kalonymos exilarch family of Babylon tracing their lineage back to King David (Marfull), is involved with the first-ever central bank in Barcelona in 1401, the Taula de Canvi. This bank is used to generate profit through usury to assemble an army to take over trade with the New World, in order to use the gold to finance the recapture of Jerusalem. So the deal Columbus offers to the Catholic Monarchs is quite similar to the deal offered to the Muslims by Bananias the Jew. "We'll deliver you the New World if you help us retake the Holy Land." "We'll deliver you Anjou if you help us retake the Holy Land." They did it again in World War One too, as recounted by Benjamin Freedman. In 1915, the Germans offered a peace deal to the Allies, who were broke and getting their butts whipped. They were about to accept it when the Jewish money power made Britain the following offer: we will give you the money you need to defeat Germany, and in exchange all we ask for in return is the Holy Land. That is how Lord Balfour ended up pledging Israel to Lord Rothschild in 1917. Of course, it meant a few million more Gentiles would have to die in three more years of pointless trench warfare, but that's just collateral damage for Zion.

See the pattern? Barzilay the Zionist definitely sees the pattern, but he very much does NOT want us to see it, so he dismisses the letter as an obvious anti-Semitic forgery.

The last sentence of the excerpt is the most interesting here. Barzilay claims that the letter is a patent fabrication because the names of “Muslim” kingdoms and kings are all based on biblical descriptions of Canaanite kings, with the kingdom of Granada as the only exception. In contrast, the text depicts well poisoning performed by Jews and lepers in terms similar to contemporary chronicles. In other words, the letter has to be fake, because there is an anachronism here: the Biblical descriptions of Canaanite kings are juxtaposed with the contemporary kingdom of Granada. Wow! Once we put on our neochronological glasses, however, the contradiction disappears, and what we see here is not a "patent forgery" but documentary evidence that Canaan was France and Spain! Barzilay's next line is classic hypnosis: The fact that this letter was forged can illuminate the development of well-poisoning accusations against Jews in central France. Well look at that! It's now a "fact" that the letter was forged.

A question for the people reading this: has Barzilay been initiated into the secrets of the grand history forging operation by the Elders of Zion in Israel, or is he just your average ground-level ideologue churning out Hasbara to generate pity in the goyim?

CONTINUED IN NEXT POST