SH Archive World population: where are the missing trillions of people?

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-07-11 04:00:05
SH.org Reaction Score
289
SH.org Reply Count
289
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Radal16
Date: 2018-07-29 23:49:23
Reaction Score: 6
I've believe our population has been decimated over and over for a very long time. If you ignore the historians and just look at the ruins all over this planet it is clear that humans (or at least humanoids) have been here for a lot longer than science would have us believe. Going from the current population (which we really don't know because they're lying) we can only extrapolate when the last major cataclysm happened. Not the beginning of the human race.

There's a lot of talk currently about these cataclysms being "resets" that are specifically created by a being or group of beings to keep us in check. I'm not comfortable with that idea, I don't want to be part of somebody's science experiment, doesn't mean it's not true just that I don't want it to be. I do question why everything on the planet right now is so small. The remains of animals from 10,000+ years to millions of years ago are many times more massive than animals alive now. Is our planet not capable of sustaining life that large anymore?
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-30 04:07:22
Reaction Score: 1
I've always felt like the last one was an accident. Something went wrong. Very wrong.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Radal16
Date: 2018-07-30 13:00:21
Reaction Score: 13
Or maybe it was done by a whole new suspect, like a greedy POS that got their hands on something they shouldn't have. Interesting that we can find evidence of cheap, abundant energy in very old pictures and then a mud flood happens and we lose all that technology and all our memories of it. Then in the ensuing years all evidence of that technology that survived the flood has been demolished. All that technology has been replaced by ugly, pollution producing processes that cost money. All that beautiful architecture has been destroyed and replaced by utilitarian boxes. Our world has been made ugly.

Sorry, I've gone way off topic here.

Industrial expositions. What mysteries did they take away with them ?

Mud Flood mansions and the gilded age deception:

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-30 16:59:50
Reaction Score: 2
I totally agree that the period between 1870s to about 1900s (I think like 1918) holds the answer. The gilded age should be a topic of its own though. By the way, appreciate the pointers, I have never heard of the term.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-30 22:15:09
Reaction Score: 1
Yes, maybe. I dunno, just a feeling I've always had. I call it a genetic memory. Maybe the person at the switch got duped. Maybe the greedy POS orchestrated the failure, but I think the one at the switch realized and felt terrible about it.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: asatiger1966
Date: 2018-08-01 05:05:21
Reaction Score: 6
It is not just those two. Every large, devoloped country is searching and fighting for old secrets. Every war since the late eighteen hundreds had an element hidden . It was old technology and there was no price in human cost two high.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-08-01 12:25:33
Reaction Score: 2
Probably why only scientists are allowed on Antarctica too since any really old technology/historical secrets would all still be buried there.
I seriously doubt there's that level of security to protect ice core samples.
Post automatically merged:

Ran across this article today that suggests we may be in for another culling very soon.

http://halturnerradioshow.com/index...ency-schedule-what-do-they-know-that-we-don-t

Hal Turner is a tool and not very believable and, honestly, I haven't researched beyond this article but thought it interesting enough to bring to the board's attention anyway.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Misshavisham
Date: 2018-08-23 18:22:01
Reaction Score: 10
Look in old graveyards. People were living to their 80s or even 90s in 1800s or now. But not everyone will. Yes, children died of things like tuberculosis but we have a proliferation of diseases they didn't have. All in all, people are not living longer.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-23 19:28:01
Reaction Score: 5
I agree with you. In my opinion this “short life” syndrome was used (among other things) as a perfect excuse to draw attention away from the ridiculously low population numbers we are experiencing.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-09-01 11:55:00
Reaction Score: 6
I don't think the population numbers are way off, there is too much evidence.

I think a couple of countries are lying though, especially North Korea and China. I think we would need to look into those countries to see how many hundreds of millions of people are added to the statistics.

Why North Korea goes dark at night

Why Chinese cinemas are empty but full

China could scrap two-child policy, ending nearly 40 years of limits

looks like disinfo, there is just a crowdfund for a single unit: waya.it
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: UnusualBean
Date: 2018-09-29 02:31:53
Reaction Score: 14
So, I did some napkin math and literally the only natural thing limiting human population potential seems to be figuring out where to put them all. If my math is right, this planet could easily feed hundreds of billions of humans, but it could only comfortably house maybe 30-50 billion at most (assuming people don't want to be crammed in there like sardines), so that puts the realistic cap around there. Unless we go underground of course, which could be doable with highly advanced sunlight lamps (which I'm sure exist and just aren't available for us plebs to use).

As for why the current population seems so unnaturally low... I can think of 8 agendas that are severely limiting population growth, although there could be more.

The first is diet. The mainstream likes to pretend that we don't really know what our ancestors ate for sure, but we do. They ate what is called a "hypercarnivore" diet, meaning 70-100% of their calories would've been from animal sources like fatty meat, dairy, and eggs. If they ate plants, they would've mostly been sprouted, fermented, soaked, or otherwise processed to unlock as many anti-nutrients as possible. This is how people's diets looked until maybe 100 years ago, and they've been changing drastically since then all over the world.

Now we are told to eat a grain-based diet with lots of fresh, ideally raw, fruits and vegetables. If we eat meat, we're told to keep it to a low percentage of our calories, and to keep it nice and lean. Most of our food is factory farmed and thus low in nutrition, and the addition of anti-nutrients from eating the plants fresh (and often raw) means the average human is extremely deficient in vitamins D and K2, both vital for proper development without deformities, and for sustained health.

To put into perspective just how much our diets have changed, the average modern American woman eats about 0.4lbs of mostly lean, mostly factory farmed meat per day. During the era of slaves it is said that the average slave ate 0.4lbs of fatty, free range meat per day. "Free" American women today are literally eating worse than slaves.

The second agenda is vaccines. Specifically, adjuvants in vaccines. You see, the elite of this world do get their pokes just like the rest of us, but they get them sans adjuvants. Adjuvants are used to elicit a heightened immune response, purportedly to make the vaccine "more effective", but it has an interesting little side effect of drastically increasing the rates of lifelong illness... if you survive, that is. Vaccinated infants are on average 5-10x more likely to die from a "mysterious" phenomenon we call Sudden Infant Death Syndrome. Whoops.

Of course, it's easy to cover that up when the only parts of the world with high enough infant mortality rates to notice a 10-fold increase are impoverished and powerless enough not to be able to speak up about it. Nobody here notices because our infant mortality rates are really low.

The third agenda is genital mutilation. It's estimated that hundreds of millions of women and billions of men worldwide have been inflicted with some form of pleasure-reducing genital mutilation. This makes sex considerably less physically enjoyable for both partners (even if only one is cut). It also causes different types of trauma if done in infancy or childhood. Specifically, when done to infants it permanently damages their empathy and logic centers, and when done to children it causes the same kind of lasting psychological damage as being raped.

The fourth agenda is war. We're told war has always been a constant in human history, but the evidence just doesn't support that. We're told we're "fighting for our freedom", but then why are we bombing random strangers half a world away? War only destroys.

The fifth agenda is pollution. We're constantly being assaulted by chemicals and heavy metals from every direction, and it's taking a toll on our physical, mental, and reproductive health. Intersex conditions are estimated to be anywhere from 2-10% of the population, some of which prohibit reproduction or make it much more difficult.

The sixth agenda is drugs. We're told that people have been doing drugs for forever, but again the evidence doesn't really support that beyond a small minority of the population. Drugs are practically being poured into people's hands, there are huge drug cartels all over the world, some of which we now refer to as "hospitals".

There is also a condition caused by a specific type of antidepressant drug, called "PSSD", which if you search up you will find to be the reality of so-called "asexuality". Asexuality is a lie told by drug companies so they can keep selling their poison.

The seventh agenda is birthing practices. Who in their right mind would tell a woman to try to birth a child horizontally??? The world has gone mad.

The eight agenda is the glorification of unhealthy bodies. In the East everybody is skinnyfat, in the West everybody is regular fat (with the tummy lipo'd out if you have enough money). We are each told by our respective medias that this is beautiful and normal and even ideal. Meanwhile the evidence is pretty conclusive that the healthy BMI range is 22-25 (25-30 for the elderly), and venturing outside of that range gets real unhealthy real fast. And don't even get me started about body fat percentage and distribution o_O


All in all, they're working overtime trying to get us not to make babies. And it's working.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-10-14 19:41:25
Reaction Score: 12
Our planet is basically empty...
Population_density_with_key.pngWorld_population_density_1994_-_with_equator.png
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-10-14 21:49:03
Reaction Score: 10
Think about it this way.

This is what 18,000 inhabitants per square mile look like:

Monaco_aerial_view.jpg

This is how humans can comfortably live when everything needed is supplied from elsewhere.

Crowded like this the whole of humanity could live in the area of the size of France, and we'd still have room for 3 billion more people.

You'd need 400,000 square miles Monaco style for humanity, which is a mere 0,25% of the entire landmass of our earth.

Now we can look back 100 years or even 200 or 250, and we can assume earth was basically depopulated back then.

1280px-Monaco_um_1900.jpg
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Apollyon
Date: 2018-10-14 22:05:17
Reaction Score: 6
I think they are way off. Think about it North Korea and china are in no way the only post Soviet totalitarian dictatorships. Look at the various central Asian countries Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan etc places with exactly the same travel restrictions as North Korea.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-10-14 22:18:20
Reaction Score: 7
What would "way off" mean? I think it's possibe there are up to 500 million or so people less than assumed, but that's highly speculative. There's no clear benefit in lying about population numbers, except for pathological countries like North Korea. Nevertheless, there need to be some proof before I say "The numbers are way off", even though I acknowledge the possibility of things being different.
Post automatically merged:

From the global fertility report (unfpa.org). 1850 compared to 2018:

fertility1850.png fertility2018.png

Except Africa, humanity is actually dying or at least stagnating. Go 50-100 years into the future, and the growing threat will be extinction, not overpopulation.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-10-18 13:35:29
Reaction Score: 9
Well, judging by the above maps, global world politics aimed at stopping population growth are quite successful.

The Powers are at force in their attempts in bringing Africa to get along with the program.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-10-18 13:54:21
Reaction Score: 2
You know, I was wondering why no one is really doing anything productive about Africa.

The desertification will destroy most of their farm lands within the next 30 years, and combined with the anti-fertility efforts they will get in line soon.

Why is it so important for them to bring down human reproduction?
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top