Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: anotherlayer
Date: 2019-01-22 15:51:05
Reaction Score: 9
Well, just to further drive your point home... we DO have photographs of all of these cities teeming with people. But they all suspiciously start to appear right around 1890 or so.It could be a lot of things. We have a whole bunch of cities sharing common traits. Plausible explanations are multiple. It could be this or it could be that. Yet where are the same time photographs where these prominent cities have people? Where are horses, carriages, street vendors?
A plausible explanation would be that no photographer chose to photograph these cities with people. But how realistic would that be?



