Coronavirus: Possible Reset

Collapseinrealtime

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2020
Messages
137
Reaction score
433
Sounds like Russia is going to be the first to make vaccination mandatory. I find it bizarre how many people seem to believe Russia will save humanity from the NWO, in reality they are one of its main advocates and enforcers. Russia along with China are the two main testing grounds of the technocracy that will be imposed everywhere soon.

I think the way the powers that be have managed to create this cult of personality around Putin that he is somehow anti-NWO and against everything that is going on (despite producing vaccines and fully participating in the agenda) is one of the greatest psyops and propaganda coups they've ever achieved.

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2021/05/19/russias-ex-pm-medvedev-backs-mandatory-vaccination-a73948
I think the sooner a country chooses to make this mandatory, the sooner this will all end, since they are most likely nearly out of volunteers. I recently saw a video on Bitchute of someone covering vaccine locations that were populated with actors to make it appear that people are lining up in droves to get the jab. The interviews were all very pro-vaccine. Wish I would have archived that one to share! Other boots on the ground videos have showcased many vaccine locations as complete ghost towns.

Not that I am advocating the government making anything mandatory, but a vaccine ultimatum would surely speed up the awakening process. An ultimatum would be nearly impossible to enforce without local business cooperating. Imagine the instant riots formed when a grocery store implements a vaccinated-only entry policy!

Russia has seen its fair share of totalitarian measures. The people may seem meek and sheepish, but they have zero confidence in their government institutions. The only thing keeping Putin alive and well is his public support of the Orthodox Church, which is also filled with thieves and vipers. In spite of its corruption, the Church as a symbol is still a relic of national sentiment, backed by a very disgruntled, hungry populace. It is about time to see some serious pushback as soon as Putin starts turning the screws tighter.

After this past year of clown show central, anyone not convinced that both Putin and Trump are NWO stooges are just not paying attention. I'm surprised there are still as many Trump supporters as there are, since he was behind Operation Warp Speed and was also responsible for issuing the state of emergency that got lockdowns rolling out across the country back in March 2020. Conservatives are still afraid to admit that the two-party system has been the source of all of our misery. If they conclude that Trump is also a puppet, who will they turn to then? A vacuum now exists in our paradigm, screaming for alternative solutions to age old problems. Government management creates the obstacles while refusing to address this fact. Instead they create new laws and taxes, packaged and marketed to appear to address the symptoms while at the same time exacerbating the disease. Anarchy is in the air. Mandatory or not, their campaign has already failed. The lawsuits alone will certainly bankrupt big Pharma. If the courts declare big Pharma exempt from liability, the courts will be declared bankrupt by the people. It may sound sticky-sweet optimistic of me to say these things, but I really don't think we have yet seen the sleeping giant of humanity stirred to awareness as we are beginning to see now. The spark is about to ignite the powder keg.
 

Vagabond

Deleted
Trusted Member
Joined
Mar 3, 2021
Messages
235
Reaction score
517
I noticed that despite the UK supposedly have a (very limited) "Green" list of "safe" travel destinations, two PCR tests are required for entry back into the UK in addition to the PCR tests required in the destination country, which adds hundreds of pounds to the cost of the holiday per person.

I actually wonder if the UK is being used as the testing ground for severely restricting/banning international travel, mainly because it is an island so this makes it a lot easier to enforce and get the ball rolling on this than in say Europe with the Schengen Zone where most countries have multiple land borders so it's much harder for the authorities to stop travel between countries.

Most British people seem to believe all these measures are temporary and things are imminently going to return to normal and usual international travel will resume, but I highly doubt it. These expensive PCR tests are here to stay I think, and if anything the restrictions are only going to get worse. Frankly I suspect the days of frequent international travel are over, most people now are only going to be able to travel abroad extremely infrequently if ever again at all.
you are correct about travel. grab it while you can, cause its going the way of the dodo.

right now for europe tho you need to show pcr or anitgen to cross most borders, in theory. however, you do seem to be able to sometimes avoid it if you are driving in your own car. not by plane though.

bastards
 

Akanah

Active member
Joined
Sep 26, 2020
Messages
156
Reaction score
169
Location
Germany
Here is still another option for the corona-pandemic. I don´t know if its plausible but our government of germany did have told us a couple of years ago we should make preparations for managed two weeks alone with eating-store because of any catastrophe (flood, earthquake or something other). Many people did not take it seriously at this time. If there is in future a big catastrophe in germany many people would not be prepared for this because of theirs greenees. For saving much people it will be better to practice the serious case with a fake-pandemic. So the corona-pandemic could be a test run for a real big catastrophe. In germany people seems to be not knowing big catastrophes or did have it repressed every time. But I can remembered me in a big catastrophe in the 90´ (like comet or solar-storm). Maybe the next catastrophe will be bigger for the whole world. In connection with my embryo-earths-theory it could be the permament binding of the earth on the mothers space-blood-system. In our whole world here will be regularly big earthquakes over all and earth will gets wilder. It is possible we never will have a normal life again with visiting festivals, museums or another but not because of corona but because of earths further development. People in past times could have lived peaceful because at this time there was no earthquakes or floods but even more earth is developed the more earthquakes and floods are on earth. The climate change and global warming could be an effect of earths development.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
953
Reaction score
2,239
Location
Bristol UK
Some interesting stuff from Deagal.com
 

Attachments

  • Deagel.com Forecast 2025.pdf
    359.2 KB · Views: 94
  • deagel disclaimer 25th September 2020.docx
    17.1 KB · Views: 56

Safranek

Moderator
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2020
Messages
191
Reaction score
711
Here's a recent telephone interview with Dr. Michael Yeadon. It sums up the perspective regarding the present plandemic from a scientist's (molecular biologist) point of view. Those speaking against him are most certainly NOT on our side.

This is the kind of realistic wake-up call that's needed to be conveyed to as many people as possible in order to gauge the full scope of the situation. The hardest pill for the masses to swallow is what Dr. Mike Yeadon emphasizes;

The governments are all working in unison to deceive us and their purpose are NOT be benevolent.

(an excerpt)

His main points included:

  1. There is “no possibility” current variants of COVID-19 will escape immunity. It is “just a lie.”
  2. Yet, governments around the world are repeating this lie, indicating that we are witnessing not just “convergent opportunism,” but a “conspiracy.” Meanwhile media outlets and Big Tech platforms are committed to the same propaganda and the censorship of the truth.
  3. Pharmaceutical companies have already begun to develop unneeded “top-up” (“booster”) vaccines for the “variants.” The companies are planning to manufacture billions of vials, in addition to the current experimental COVID-19 “vaccine” campaign.
  4. Regulatory agencies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, have announced that since these “top-up” vaccines will be so similar to the prior injections which were approved for emergency use authorization, drug companies will not be required to “perform any clinical safety studies.”
  5. Thus, this virtually means that design and implementation of repeated and coerced mRNA vaccines “go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, [injecting] some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.”
  6. Why are they doing this? Since no benign reason is apparent, the use of vaccine passports along with a “banking reset” could issue in a totalitarianism unlike the world has ever seen. Recalling the evil of Stalin, Mao, and Hitler, “mass depopulation” remains a logical outcome.
  7. The fact that this at least could be true means everyone must “fight like crazy to make sure that system never forms.”

April 7, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — Dr. Michael Yeadon, Pfizer's former Vice President and Chief Scientist for Allergy & Respiratory who spent 32 years in the industry leading new medicines research and retired from the pharmaceutical giant with “the most senior research position” in his field, spoke with LifeSiteNews in a telephone interview.

He addressed the “demonstrably false” propaganda from governments in response to COVID-19, including the “lie” of dangerous variants, the totalitarian potential for “vaccine passports,” and the strong possibility we are dealing with a “conspiracy” which could lead to something far beyond the carnage experienced in the wars and massacres of the 20th century.

Dr. Yeadon began identifying himself as merely a “boring guy” who went “to work for a big drug company … listening to the main national broadcast and reading the broad sheet newspapers.”

Continuing, he said: “But in the last year I have realized that my government and its advisers are lying in the faces of the British people about everything to do with this coronavirus. Absolutely everything. It’s a fallacy this idea of asymptomatic transmission and that you don’t have symptoms, but you are a source of a virus. That lockdowns work, that masks have a protective value obviously for you or someone else, and that variants are scary things and we even need to close international borders in case some of these nasty foreign variants get in.

“Or, by the way, on top of the current list of gene-based vaccines that we have miraculously made, there will be some ‘top-up’ vaccines to cope with the immune escape variants.

“Everything I have told you, every single one of those things is demonstrably false. But our entire national policy is based on these all being broadly right, but they are all wrong.”


‘Conspiracy’ and not just ‘convergent opportunism’

“But what I would like to do is talk about immune escape because I think that’s probably going to be the end game for this whole event, which I think is probably a conspiracy. Last year I thought it was what I called ‘convergent opportunism,’ that is a bunch of different stakeholder groups have managed to pounce on a world in chaos to push us in a particular direction. So it looked like it was kind of linked, but I was prepared to say it was just convergence.”

“I [now] think that’s naïve. There is no question in my mind that very significant powerbrokers around the world have either planned to take advantage of the next pandemic or created the pandemic. One of those two things is true because the reason it must be true is that dozens and dozens of governments are all saying the same lies and doing the same inefficacious things that demonstrably cost lives.

“And they are talking the same sort of future script which is, ‘We don’t want you to move around because of these pesky varmints, these “variants”’— which I call ‘samiants’ by the way, because they are pretty much the same — but they’re all saying this and they are all saying ‘don’t worry, there will be “top-up” vaccines that will cope with the potential escapees.’ They’re all saying this when it is obviously nonsense.”


Possible end game: vaccine ‘passports’ tied to spending allowances, thorough control

“I think the end game is going to be, ‘everyone receives a vaccine’… Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.

“When they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be ‘vaccinated,’ or not … and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that’s what this is all about because once you’ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.

“For example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only spend through using an app that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.”

“And, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these vaccine passports, as they are called, but I’ve heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app.

“But even if that’s not [the] true [intent of the vaccine campaign], it doesn’t matter, the fact that it could be true means everyone [reading] this should fight like crazy to make sure that [vaccine passport] system never forms.”

“[With such a system], here is an example of what they could make you do, and I think this is what they’re going to make [people] do.

“You could invent a story that is about a virus and its variations, its mutations over time. You could invent the story and make sure you embed it through the captive media, make sure that no one can counter it by censoring alternative sources, then people are now familiar with this idea that this virus mutates, which it does, and that it produces variants, which is true [as well], which could escape your immune system, and that’s a lie.

“But, nevertheless, we’re going to tell you it’s true, and then when we tell you that it’s true and we say ‘but we’ve got the cure, here’s a top-up vaccine,’ you’ll get a message, based on this one global, this one ID system: ‘Bing!’ it will come up and say ‘Dr. Yeadon, time for your top-up vaccine. And, by the way,’ it will say ‘your existing immune privileges remain valid for four weeks. But if you don’t get your top-up vaccine in that time, you will unfortunately detrimentally be an “out person,” and you don’t want that, do you?’ So, that’s how it’ll work, and people will just walk up and they’ll get their top-up vaccine.”


Gov’t lies, Big Pharma moves forward, medicine regulators get out of the way, and possible ‘mass-depopulation’

“But I will take you through this, Patrick, because I am qualified to comment. I don’t know what Vanden Bossche is about. There was no possibility at all, based on all of the variants that are in the public domain, 4000 or so of them, none of them are going to escape immunity [i.e. become more dangerous].

“Nevertheless, politicians and health advisers (to loads of governments) are saying that they are. They’re lying. Well, why would you do that?

“Here’s the other thing, in parallel, pharmaceutical companies have said, several of them, it will be quite easy for us to adjust our gene-based vaccines, and we can hasten them through development, and we can help you.

“And here’s the real scary part, global medicines regulators like [the U.S. Food and Drug Administration] FDA, the Japanese medicines agency, the European Medicines Agency, have gotten together and announced … since top-up vaccines will be considered so similar to the ones that we have already approved for emergency use authorization, we are not going to require the drug companies to perform any clinical safety studies.

“So, you’ve got on the one hand, governments and their advisers that are lying to you that variants are different enough from the current virus that, even if you’re immune from natural exposure or vaccination, you’re a risk and you need to come and get this top-up vaccine. So, I think neither of those are true. So why is the drug company making the top-up vaccines? And [with] the regulators having got out of the way — and if Yeadon is right, and I’m sure I am or I wouldn’t be telling you this — you go from the computer screen of a pharmaceutical company into the arms of hundreds of millions of people, some superfluous genetic sequence for which there is absolutely no need or justification.

“And if you wanted to introduce a characteristic which could be harmful and could even be lethal, and you can even tune it to say ‘let’s put it in some gene that will cause liver injury over a nine-month period,’ or, cause your kidneys to fail but not until you encounter this kind of organism [that would be quite possible]. Biotechnology provides you with limitless ways, frankly, to injure or kill billions of people.

“And since I can’t think of a benign explanation for any of the steps: variants, top-up vaccines, no regulatory studies… it’s not only that I cannot think of a benign explanation, the steps described, and the scenario described, and the necessary sort of resolution to this false problem is going to allow what I just described: unknown, and unnecessary gene sequences injected into the arms of potentially billions of people for no reason.

“I’m very worried … that pathway will be used for mass depopulation, because I can’t think of any benign explanation.”


‘Absurdly impossible’ variants will escape immunity, ‘just a lie’

“If I can show you that one major thing that governments around the world are telling the people is a lie, you should take my 32 years of experienced opinion that says, most of it, if not all of it, is a lie.”

“The most different variant is only 0.3% different from the original sequence as emailed out of Wuhan in … January 2020. 0.3% [is] the one [variant] that is the most different on the planet so far. And now another way of saying it is, ‘all of the variants are not less than 99.7% identical to each other.’

“Now, you might be thinking, ‘hmm, .3%, is that enough [to escape immunity and become more dangerous]?’ The answer is no. Get away, ya know, get out of here …

“The human immune system is a thing of wonder. What it does is when it faces a new pathogen like this, you’ve got professional cells, they’re called professional antigen-presenting cells —they’re kind of rough tough things that tend not to succumb to viruses. And their job is to grab foreign things in the near environment and tear them limb from limb [inside the cell]. They really cut them up into hundreds of pieces. And then they present these pieces on the surfaces of their cell to other bits of your immune system, and amazingly, because of the variability that God and nature gave you, huge variability to recognize foreign things, and your body ends up using 15 to 20 different specific motifs that it spots about this virus. They’re called epitopes, basically they’re just like little photographs of the details about this virus. That’s what they do. And that is what is called your repertoire, your immune repertoire is like 20 different accurate photographs, close-ups, of different bits of this virus.

“Now, if a tiny piece of the virus changes, like the .3% I’ve just described, if you are reinfected by that variant, your professional cells tear into that virus and cut it into pieces, present them again, and lo and behold, most of the pieces that you have already seen and recognized, are still there in the variants.

“There is absolutely no chance that all of them will fail to be recognized and that is what is required for immune escape, to escape your immunity. It must present to you as a new pathogen. It must be sufficiently different that, when it is cut up by your professional checker cells, it won’t find mostly the same thing it has seen before. And that is just absurdly impossible when you have only varied .3%, so it is 99.7% (similar).

“You can go and check that by looking at papers by a person called Alison Tarke. There is also Shane Crotty, and all of the other co-authors.

“And before them, coming from my theoretical understanding of multi-locus immunity, which is what I just badly tried to describe, to what actually happens … If your [immune system] is presented with something that contains even half of those similar pieces, there is no way your body will say, ‘that’s a new pathogen.’

“And, so, the idea that 0.3% could even have a chance of getting around immunity is just a lie. It’s not [even] like an opinion difference.

“I don’t think 3% would be enough. That’s 10 times more variation than has occurred in 16 months [with this virus]. I don’t even think 30% difference would be enough. So, I’m saying that 100 times more variation than has actually happened, would still leave me putting a big bet on the human immune system not being fooled that these are new pathogens.

“I’ve chatted this over with several professors of immunology and they agreed with me, it’s like, ‘why are you asking me this?’

“So, I think that what I’ve just said is that governments and their advisors in multiple countries are lying about variants. That’s a massive thing! You should check it out. Your readers should check it out. If it’s true, don’t you think it’s terrifying?! It was when I realized it.

“So, they’re lying about variants, and then, of course, since [the variants] are not really different, you do not need a ‘top-up’ vaccine. Now you should be getting the hairs on the back of your neck up, because they are making them right now!”

“They are making billions of vials of it. And they will be available by the end of the year.

“And I think they’ll require people to first, be on the vaccine passport one-world database, and then it will roll up into the top-ups, and if it takes a bit longer it will take a bit longer.

“But this is not going away. It won’t go away until enough people, if they ever do, say ‘you’re a bunch of frauds and we are taking our freedoms back, so you can just stop doing this.’

“Because one person shouting into the wilderness and all of the other academics looking the other way, will have us just going down this pipe maybe a week later than if I hadn’t said anything, but we’re still going down to hell.

“So, that’s why I’m frightened.

“The variants aren’t different. I call them ‘samiants’… they’re pretty much the same. They’re not different. Therefore, you don’t need a top-up vaccine, so don’t go near any of them.”


‘Why is my government lying to me?’ Because ‘they are going to kill you.’

“[And if you recognize that our governments are involved in a major verifiable lie], don’t just turn your computer off and go to supper. Stop. Look out the window, and think, ‘why is my government lying to me about something so fundamental?’ Because, I think the answer is, they are going to kill you using this method. They’re going to kill you and your family.

“The eugenicists have got hold of the levers of power and this is a really artful way of getting you to line-up and receive some unspecified thing that will damage you. I have no idea what it will actually be, but it won’t be a vaccine because you don’t need one. And it won’t kill you on the end of the needle because you would spot that.

“It could be something that will produce normal pathology, it will be at various times between vaccination and the event, it will be plausibly deniable because there will be something else going on in the world at that time, in the context of which your demise, or that of your children will look normal.

“That’s what I would do if I wanted to get rid of 90 or 95% of the world’s population. And I think that’s what they’re doing.”

“Now I don’t know [for certain] that they’re going to use that [system] to kill you, but I can’t think of a benign reason, and with that power they certainly could harm you, or control you, so you should object [and strenuously oppose it].”


People can’t deal with this level of evil, but Soviets, Hitler, Mao show its possibility

“It’s become absolutely clear to me, even when I talk to intelligent people, friends, acquaintances … and they can tell I’m telling them something important, but they get to the point [where I say] ‘your government is lying to you in a way that could lead to your death and that of your children,’ and they can’t begin to engage with it. And I think maybe 10% of them understand what I said, and 90% of those blank their understanding of it because it is too difficult. And my concern is, we are going to lose this, because people will not deal with the possibility that anyone is so evil…

“But I remind you of what happened in Russia in the 20th Century, what happened in 1933 to 1945, what happened in, you know, Southeast Asia in some of the most awful times in the post-war era. And, what happened in China with Mao and so on.

“We’ve only got to look back two or three generations. All around us there are people who are as bad as the people doing this. They’re all around us. So, I say to folks, the only thing that really marks this one out, is its scale.

“But actually, this is probably less bloody, it’s less personal, isn’t it? The people who are steering this … it’s going to be much easier for them. They don’t have to shoot anyone in the face. They don’t have to beat someone to death with a baseball bat, or freeze them, starve them, make them work until they die. All of those things did happen two or three generations back and our grandparents or great grandparents were either victims of this, or they were actually members of it, or at least they witnessed it from overseas. That’s how close we are.

“And all I’m saying is, some shifts like that are happening again, but now they are using molecular biology.

“And the people going along with it, I think they would probably say, ‘I was only following orders,’ which we have heard before.

“But I know, because I have talked to lots of people, and some of them have said ‘I don’t want to believe that you are right, so I’m going to just put it away because if it is true, I can’t handle it.’ And I think … all you need to do is find a good reason to tell people, ‘Don’t take the vaccine unless you’re a medical risk of dying from the virus!’ That seems to me a pretty good line!”


Towards a solution – ‘We need God’

“I’m a scientist, and I can tell you, talking to non-scientists, using science as a tool, will not work. It will fail.

“So, we need philosophers, people who understand logic, religion, something like that, [they have] got to wrestle with this, and start talking in a language people will understand. Because if we leave it with scientists, people like me, even though I’m well-intentioned, I’m a gabbling alien as far as most people in the street are concerned. They won’t believe the government will lie to them, they don’t believe the government would ever do anything that will harm them, but they are [doing such things].”

Finally, in an email correspondence, Dr. Yeadon concluded, “I have latest taken to signing off with ‘May God save us’, because I think we need God now more than at any time since WW2.”

LifeSiteNews has produced an extensive COVID-19 vaccines resources page. View it here.

Soursce:

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/e...to-you-in-a-way-that-could-lead-to-your-death
 

Prolix

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
139
Reaction score
374
This is interesting, in as much as the timeframe (two years) is the one I've heard independently, but the form in which the information has been put out is easily discreditable (linked to a video that makes no mention of the contents of the text, additional to which, it's steeped in the germ theory model).

All vaccinated people will die within 2 years.
Nobel laureate Luc Montagnier has confirmed that there is no chance of survival for people who have received any form of the vaccine. In the shocking interview, the world's leading virologist stated bluntly: "There is no hope and no possible treatment for those who have already been vaccinated. We must be prepared to cremate the bodies." The scientific genius backed up the claims of other eminent virologists after studying the ingredients of the vaccine. "They will all die from antibody-dependent enhancement. That is all that can be said."

I can't link the video directly (it was a Telegram attachment), but it can be found here with transcript below. The text and video have been doing the rounds; because they don't match, it's easy for a reader to conclude the text part is nonsense (maybe Montagnier said the part in text elsewhere, but I'd hazard it's unlikely).

If we look at the curve from the WHO, since the vaccinations started in January, the curve showing new infections (contamination) has exploded, along with deaths.

Notably among young people.

—Yes. With thromboses, etc.

How do you view the mass vaccination program? Mass vaccination compared to treatments that work and aren’t expensive.

—It’s an enormous mistake, isn’t it? A scientific error as well as a medical error. It is an unacceptable mistake. The history books will show that, because it is the vaccination that is creating the variants.

—For the China virus, there are antibodies, created by the vaccine. What does the virus do? Does it die or find another solution?

—The new variants are a production and result from the vaccination. You see it in each country, it’s the same: the curve of vaccination is followed by the curve of deaths.

—I’m following this closely and I am doing experiments at the Institute with patients who became sick with Corona after being vaccinated. I will show you that they are creating the variants that are resistant to the vaccine.

Should we be vaccinating during a pandemic?

—It’s unthinkable.

—They’re silent… many people know this, epidemiologists know it.

—It is the antibodies produced by the virus that enable an infection to become stronger.

—It’s what we call Antibody Dependent Enhancement, which means antibodies favor a certain infection. The antibody attaches to the virus, from that moment it has the receptors, the antibodies, we have them in the macrophage etc.

—It pokes the virus and not accidentally, but because of the fact that they’re linked to the antibodies.

—It is clear that the new variants are created by antibody-mediated selection due to the vaccination. OK?
 

Will Scarlet

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2021
Messages
302
Reaction score
745
So far I have had 2 phone calls telling me I have an appointment for the 'vaccine'. Each time I tell them I don't have an appointment for it as I never asked for one. Today my wife had her first phone call. She explained why she doesn't want it, so the guy on the other end said "I will have to mark you down as a 'Rejection' then". This labelling is designed to invoke fear of consequential persecution. They are getting even more desperate because the rejection figures are much higher than they are publicising..

It has been demonstrated on Telegram, YT, etc., that immediately after the injection a magnet will adhere to the area of penetration. There is metal in those jabs and not just a bit either.
 

ThreeSocks

Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2020
Messages
18
Reaction score
30
So far I have had 2 phone calls telling me I have an appointment for the 'vaccine'. Each time I tell them I don't have an appointment for it as I never asked for one. Today my wife had her first phone call. She explained why she doesn't want it, so the guy on the other end said "I will have to mark you down as a 'Rejection' then". This labelling is designed to invoke fear of consequential persecution. They are getting even more desperate because the rejection figures are much higher than they are publicising..

It has been demonstrated on Telegram, YT, etc., that immediately after the injection a magnet will adhere to the area of penetration. There is metal in those jabs and not just a bit either.

What country are you in? I have yet to hear about that happening in Canada, but I expect it might when the people stop lining up to be euthanized, umm, I mean, immunized.
 

E.Bearclaw

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Messages
128
Reaction score
508
Location
Northampton, Midlands, UK
I received my pamphlet and invitation through today.

It came with a helpful 'guide to phase 2 of the programme' pamphlet.

It had some wording in, that was interesting to my s elf. In a section titled "About the types of vaccine"

"In the UK several different types of covid vaccines will be used during 2021. The vaccines will only be approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness."

"Over 30 million people in the UK have been vaccinated against..."


Now I read this, will only, excerpt as indicative that they haven't been approved, and that the rollout of the vaccine itself is the large study. I mentioned it to my GF, and she said she see's what I am saying. But also that she would read it as that that is just clarifying that the approval process is based upon large studies. To which, I said, I see what you are saying. However, I think that if large studies had been done, the wording should surely be The vaccines have been approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness.
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
772
Reaction score
2,307
However, I think that if large studies had been done, the wording should surely be The vaccines have been approved on the basis of large studies of safety and effectiveness.
Me too.
 

E.Bearclaw

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Messages
128
Reaction score
508
Location
Northampton, Midlands, UK

I guess the logical extension, which has already been shown here and most are of the opine of, is that this rollout is the large study. Nonetheless, from this limited sample the NHS appears to be wording in the same way.

I also noted that the letter was addressed to myself without a legal title. I have previously informed them that I have no legal title, so I guess that could be why, although they have never amended any other such correspondence. However, that it is odd. I wonder whether they are actually trying to get consent from the human rather than the legal fiction.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
953
Reaction score
2,239
Location
Bristol UK
I also noted that the letter was addressed to myself without a legal title. I have previously informed them that I have no legal title, so I guess that could be why, although they have never amended any other such correspondence. However, that it is odd. I wonder whether they are actually trying to get consent from the human rather than the legal fiction.
That is interesting, however it is way out of the norm because it would need to come from a human as the corps can only communicate with corps, or maybe we are seeing a crossing over of the realms.
 

E.Bearclaw

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2020
Messages
128
Reaction score
508
Location
Northampton, Midlands, UK
Noted, I did feel I was missing something. To both of you. Thanks, The logic of my thought process is however that this vaccine is a transaction(?) of an occult kind, in the pure meaning of the term, i.e that there is something hidden. Which again is kind of obvious. As opposed to limited and delimited by maritime law. In short, it struck me as odd, and still to this point does. Ever since I became aware of the legal fiction comment, I have noticed that any letter from an authority comes with a legal title attached. So when one is absent it strikes me as weird. And I wonder why. However having come across admin plenty of times before, it is most likely just my favourite sort of error. A clerical one.
 

kd-755

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
772
Reaction score
2,307
All post is sent and delivered to an address aka state property . Addressee is of no relevance to the delivery.
NHS, blessed be its name, is the state offering something to a citizen of state through the content within the envelope.
Neither state, NHS, citizen can speak or listen. It takes a living being to commit fraud by acting in fraud using a legal name address d.o.b to gain a benefit from the offer. In the case of COCO the vaccine is the benefit being fraudulently obtained.
Were vaccines administered by force then in the states legal system no-one is committing fraud and the state holds 100% liability for consequences arising.
Despite appearances rule buy authority requires the explicit not implicit consent of the ruled.
 

gkelly

Banned
Joined
Oct 5, 2020
Messages
22
Reaction score
19
Having made this statement, now please provide the associated info you are referring to, showing why you think its a conjecture by providing any opposing research, as others put in the effort to post evidence (documents, videos by qualified individuals) and comment on it's validity. This is expected from anyone who wishes to dispute a presented viewpoint.

I don't see this standard being applied to anyone else on this site. People can talk about demons taking control of people who have had the vaccination or it being performed by mysterious PTB, etc., yet if I say some of the messages on here are conjecture, I get called out by a moderator.

So...I need to provide opposing research to these "facts?"
Got it. Thanks.
I will stop posting here since my opinions don't match the Alex Jonesesque fear mongering and ATS style of documentation.
 

Citezenship

Well-Known Member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2020
Messages
953
Reaction score
2,239
Location
Bristol UK
Interesting sentence from this document.

https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download
. Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV were available for CDC use at the time the test was developed and this study conducted, assays designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA (N gene; GenBank accession: MN908947.2) of known titer (RNA copies/µL) spiked into a diluent consisting of a suspension of human A549 cells and viral transport medium (VTM) to mimic clinical specimen.
 

trismegistus

Moderator
Staff member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2020
Messages
329
Reaction score
653
Location
Ozarks
I don't see this standard being applied to anyone else on this site.

This standard is applied literally all over the site, constantly.


yet if I say some of the messages on here are conjecture, I get called out by a moderator.

Specifically, you made a claim to which a moderator replied and suggested that you read over the hundreds of replies to this thread that do, in fact, have quite a bit more to them than conjecture. Your choice instead was to paint this entire thread with a broad brush and call it all conjecture.

There is plenty of interesting information, documentation, speculation, predictions, and theories in this thread - all are allowed. But if youre going to come in here and paint with broad strokes and call it an “ATS” style thread - don’t be surprised if you’re asked to expand on your thoughts.
 

veeall

Active member
Trusted Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2020
Messages
86
Reaction score
226
Stumbled upon these in the internet.

Contains good bits. I haven't read it fully.
https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/8/4344/htm
A recent experimental study even demonstrated that all mask-wearing people (surgical, N95, fabric masks) release significantly and proportionately smaller particles of size 0.3 to 0.5 μm into the air than mask-less people, both when breathing, speaking and coughing [98]. According to this, the masks act like nebulizers and contribute to the production of very fine aerosols. Smaller particles, however, spread faster and further than large ones for physical reasons. Of particular interest in this experimental reference study was the finding that a test subject wearing a single-layer fabric mask was also able to release a total of 384% more particles (of various sizes) when breathing than a person without [98]. ...

Edit: the too speculative rest deleted.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Top