Coronavirus: Possible Reset

"An Early Warning Cartoon" from 1930...



Captions read: "How to Take Over the World, This is Their Plan"; "Introduce a Weaponised Influenza"; "Flood Newspapers and Radio with Death"; "Shut Down Shops and Churches"; "Use Law Enforcement To Stifle Dissent"; "Parade The Sick And the Dead"; "Inject a Vaccine To Sterilise The Work shy and Euthanize the Old"; "the People who Own the Banks now owns the hospitals. This is Their Plan To Own YOU."

If it's genuine it's remarkable. If it's a forgery, it's very well done.
 
"An Early Warning Cartoon" from 1930...



Captions read: "How to Take Over the World, This is Their Plan"; "Introduce a Weaponised Influenza"; "Flood Newspapers and Radio with Death"; "Shut Down Shops and Churches"; "Use Law Enforcement To Stifle Dissent"; "Parade The Sick And the Dead"; "Inject a Vaccine To Sterilise The Work shy and Euthanize the Old"; "the People who Own the Banks now owns the hospitals. This is Their Plan To Own YOU."

If it's genuine it's remarkable. If it's a forgery, it's very well done.

This video should have hundreds of comments, but has a measly 2 likes. We have all seen the scripted nature of the pandemic, and we know the powers that be are prone to repeat their winning formula's ad nauseam.
 
"An Early Warning Cartoon" from 1930...



Captions read: "How to Take Over the World, This is Their Plan"; "Introduce a Weaponised Influenza"; "Flood Newspapers and Radio with Death"; "Shut Down Shops and Churches"; "Use Law Enforcement To Stifle Dissent"; "Parade The Sick And the Dead"; "Inject a Vaccine To Sterilise The Work shy and Euthanize the Old"; "the People who Own the Banks now owns the hospitals. This is Their Plan To Own YOU."

If it's genuine it's remarkable. If it's a forgery, it's very well done.

Where did you find this? There's no context given on YouTube as to where it originated.
 
Where did you find this? There's no context given on YouTube as to where it originated.

I think this is a modern made fake, but it reminded me of a genuine one that looked a lot like this but was a warning against communism. So, I has a look for the one I remember but couldn't find it - I did however find this little gem from 1948, the same year Orwell wrote 1984 of course! That other cartoon is probably to distract us from ones like this.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=El7qgQXd-xs
 
Today is 7,11 as well, big opportunity for false flag.

The way the match panned out doesn't make me any less inclined to think it was stage managed and the outcome rigged, although I did think that the outcome would be in England's favour this time and that the celebrations would be used as the excuse for a new lockdown. Although the mass gatherings in pubs, etc, to watch the matches probably already gives them ample excuse for a lockdown any way.

I think it's probably an exercise in totally demoralising the English proletariat post-Brexit, in the way that England was on the brink of winning at various points of the match, even looking like they would win on penalties at one point but still losing after all. If the intention is demoralisation then England's lose couldn't have happened any more perfectly.
 
This video should have hundreds of comments, but has a measly 2 likes. We have all seen the scripted nature of the pandemic, and we know the powers that be are prone to repeat their winning formula's ad nauseam.


The amount of hateful totalitarian speech I'm seeing in the internet these days, related to the fraudemic, is unprecedented in the history of the internet. There are people literally asking for state-sponsored death shot squads in the streets. If you tell anyone outside of this forum you don't took the vax they will likely try to crucify you, in a very irrational way. This people was two years ago screaming "my body, my rules", and now are screaming "your body, their rules", right in your face.
 
Where did you find this? There's no context given on YouTube as to where it originated.

It turned up on a Telegram channel with Spanish subtitles, then I hunted it down on YT.

TBH, I know what the 'experts' say about it, but I would have expected it to be better quality if it was a forgery - for instance, not skewed at an angle. The text titles are integrated very well and must be newly created even if the backgrounds come from a genuine cartoon. Let's not forget that The Spanish Flu episode of 1917-23 could have inspired such a cartoon in 1930 as the scientific types were still mucking about with it even then and making headlines with their findings.
 
It turned up on a Telegram channel with Spanish subtitles, then I hunted it down on YT.

TBH, I know what the 'experts' say about it, but I would have expected it to be better quality if it was a forgery - for instance, not skewed at an angle. The text titles are integrated very well and must be newly created even if the backgrounds come from a genuine cartoon. Let's not forget that The Spanish Flu episode of 1917-23 could have inspired such a cartoon in 1930 as the scientific types were still mucking about with it even then and making headlines with their findings.
I immediately thought it looked suspect for the reason you suggest (the poor quality has been overdone IMO). I only looked up the “experts” (who are, sometimes, right) after I’d prepared my reply.
 
I immediately thought it looked suspect for the reason you suggest (the poor quality has been overdone IMO). I only looked up the “experts” (who are, sometimes, right) after I’d prepared my reply.

I'm not saying it is genuine, I was just offering some different points of view for consideration. (y)
 
I find it irritating when people against the lockdowns say "the virus has a 99.9% survival rate", because that is acknowledging the existence of "the virus" and playing straight into the agenda basically.

Also, I was thinking why the British government are planning to end all restrictions on 19th July, because it seems inconsistent with everything they've done so far, and I wonder if it's because they want all these restrictions to become voluntary and imposed by social pressure and businesses doing it by choice rather than by law and the threat of fines.
 
I also wonder if the reason BoZo is apparently lifting the restrictions on 19th July is to give other countries an excuse to ban all travel with the UK and essentially make this country a pariah nation with its citizens not allowed to leave.
 
I find it irritating when people against the lockdowns say "the virus has a 99.9% survival rate", because that is acknowledging the existence of "the virus" and playing straight into the agenda basically.

Also, I was thinking why the British government are planning to end all restrictions on 19th July, because it seems inconsistent with everything they've done so far, and I wonder if it's because they want all these restrictions to become voluntary and imposed by social pressure and businesses doing it by choice rather than by law and the threat of fines.
The British government will end all the restrictions to prove the necessity of the next lockdown.
 
I find it irritating when people against the lockdowns say "the virus has a 99.9% survival rate", because that is acknowledging the existence of "the virus" and playing straight into the agenda basically.

Also, I was thinking why the British government are planning to end all restrictions on 19th July, because it seems inconsistent with everything they've done so far, and I wonder if it's because they want all these restrictions to become voluntary and imposed by social pressure and businesses doing it by choice rather than by law and the threat of fines.

Totally consistent with their actions so far if you think about it. Last year, they started to ease restrictions in May before opening the pubs in July. Then the 'trade off' for the pubs and shops fully re-opening was to make masks mandatory, prior to this 'lifting' of restirctions masks weren't compulsory. They even admitted that masks didn't really work, but that it was comforting for those who were scared to go back out so they did it to help revive the economy.... Masks were made mandatory end of July after we had a few weeks of fewer restrictions, although social distancing never dissapeared. Then in August/Sept they started introducing more restrictions as flu season approached, rule of 6 and local lock downs over 3 tiers. October saw most regions raised to tier 3, before November saw us back in full lockdown to 'save Christmas'. They promised to lift restrictions for 5 days after Christmas as a reward for locking down in November, and then changed their minds as we'd all kill our grannies. Then the lockdown was re-imposed in Jan and began to be gradually lifted from May and here we are again in July with the promise of freedom day again.

So, despite the experimental genetic therapy being dished out, the same scenario is being played. Gradual lifting of restrictions to key people hanging on, before a few weeks of almost freedom to placate people, then a new reason to lock back down. The new variant will really get going once we hit flu season from Sept onwards just like last year and we'll be fully locked down again - it would be irresponsible not to ;)

The plan of course is various states of lockdown for 4 or 5 years whilst we implement the great reset, but even the most brain washed sheep might have protested had we announced a 4 - 5 year lockdown last march :) The totalitarian tip toe describes this technique quite well, take baby steps or more people will oppose you.
 
Macron has announced that "vaccine passports" will be mandatory to go to bars, restaurants and nightclubs in France. I think the dominos are really starting to fall on this. So far there's been a lot of resistance to this in the UK, but continental Europeans seem to be much more accepting of this type of authoritarianism it seems to me.

Problem is now France has done it, this will soften public opinion in the UK on the issue as the proles will think if France/Europe has done it it can't be so bad.

Macron announces Covid vaccination passes for bars and restaurants
 
Back
Top