Coronavirus: Possible Reset

I get the sense that Oxford/AstraZeneca and by extension Britain generally is being set up as the scapegoat for the fallout from this and will be made a global pariah as a result.

I don't sense that at all. I think is just business as usual in England.

The CDC, WHO and indirectly the WEF are the main proponents behind this, or to put it more correctly, the ones controlling those enterprises. The plans are country-specific (as stated in the earlier published Rockefeller Institute document), they basically adapt the restrictions to each country/culture.

Its seems clear to me that the main targets of the scheme are the big four EU countries of England, Germany, France and Italy. They are the ones who are being economically 'equalized'. Included are all British Commonwealth countries.


I've looked and looked and there is no available information on the web about the numbers getting which specific vaccine. Lots of numbers by age, region etc but not a peep about which manufacturer is shipping more than others.
Again comes back to one word, Confusion.

My hunch at this point based on current info is that by not providing that data, they can at a later time point the vaccine 'anomalies' to one specific vaccine, the scapegoat. This way, the others can remain 'respectable' and avoid public backlash.
 
I've looked and looked and there is no available information on the web about the numbers getting which specific vaccine. Lots of numbers by age, region etc but not a peep about which manufacturer is shipping more than others.
Again comes back to one word, Confusion.

Yeah there seems to be no info on that, they just say "the vaccine" as if it's all the same one. I would have assumed Oxford/AstraZeneca would be the main one, it being the British vaccine, but in reality that may not be the case at all.

Speaking objectively, it seems to me that the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA technology is a lot more untested and dangerous than the older and more conventional technology of the Oxford/AstraZeneca one. They know a lot of people are especially concerned about the safety of the mRNA vaccines, so they are running a propaganda campaign to cast doubt on Oxford/AstraZeneca specifically and manipulate people to actively favour the mRNA vaccines, which I suspect is the ones the globalists really want to inject people with.
 
Nothing to add to this fisking of the lunatics.
shah on vaxx illogic.jpg
Edit to add
jenny on intelligence.jpg
 
From what I've seen the Irish are even more zealous and fanatical Covid cultists than the English. Ireland is the last country I'd hold up as an example of standing up to this agenda.
 
Ireland is the last country I'd hold up as an example of standing up to this agenda.
I didn't hold up a country I said Irish as the doctor, the footballer and the lady on twitter I posted up above are all Irish and all are done with taking shit.
 
Ireland is the last country I'd hold up as an example of standing up to this agenda.
I didn't hold up a country I said Irish as the doctor, the footballer and the lady on twitter I posted up above are all Irish and all are done with taking shit.

I got the impression you were saying the Irish as a whole are particularly brave and inclined to stand up to this agenda compared to say the English. There are prominent individuals in England who have spoken out against this.

Equally I've seen various examples of Irish people actively defending the restrictions imposed by their government and chastising Britain for not having as strict rules as they do. Sure there are some brave Irish individuals, but the Irish in general are braver than the English in opposing this agenda? I just don't see it.

In fact, Ireland has imposed even stricter rules than England such as having police checkpoints between counties and only allowing people to travel within a 5km radius of their home. Even Boris Johnson hasn't dared impose such rules in England. I find people quite liberally throw around these accolades about the "brave" and "fighting" Irish, yet in reality I don't see that they're any better than the English.
 
This is well worth a watch. It's a BBC program made by what was formally a good set of researchers who uncover fraud, theft, corruption etc at all levels of society and in business and government. First broadcast in 1953, it is the world's longest-running news television program. It seriously has a pretty good reputation for uncovering lies, deceit and dishonesty as an important investigative journalism body for the benefit of people and organisations in the UK.

The particular program below was made in response to the 'Ask the Experts' pod by doctors and Physicians from all over the world ie Dr Andrew Kaufman et al. The lady who appears to be the chief investigator here is called a 'Specialist Disinformation Reporter'.

Her first real comment in response to one of the doctors in the doctors pod is "This information is false, it's been produced to prey on our fears". Needless to say, she has no medical training whatsoever, but uses as a professor Liam Smeeth for most of 'her information' This man works for the London School of medicine, an organisation that have received over £250 million from the Bill and Melinda gates foundation. This fact was rather unsurprisingly missed out from this particular Panorama Research team for their program. Needless to say, this program is awful, but the techniques being used on members of the public are rather interesting. It's a shame that they have used the Panorama umbrella to produce this nonsense, which says to me the BBC and their controllers are so desperate to get their points over, that they are willing to sacrifice the reputation of what has generally been a well respected vehicle for journalism.

I love the comments on youtube, and have increasingly found people making more and more of their truthful, questioning and cutting comments on this platform against all the propaganda we are currently facing.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jiGt_e58RIU


Here is the prompt response from many of the same doctors to the Panorama program named 'Ask the Experts 2'. This pod is around an hour long, twice as long as their original pod, and contains more info and now more doctors. I don't believe we will be getting a response from the 'Disinformation reporter now working for Panorama. I would love to be wrong though, but facing up to this many doctors and winning the argument will need more puppets. How many medical puppets and puppet organisations are there?
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/ask-...21-bbc-panorama-response_OvssgcJXMblheFt.html
The comments on Brand new Tube for this pod are top quality, and there are some fascinating additions from the makers of this film ' Oracle'. These comments are well worth reading.
 
Last edited:
Apparently large numbers of people are boycotting the AstraZeneca vaccine in Germany and France, with hundreds of thousands of vials of it unused because people are refusing that specific vaccine. Apparently they want the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA ones instead.

What's the real story here? Are the French and Germans really only boycotting one specific vaccine, or is it a vaccine boycott in general?

My guess would be this is a typical example of "divide and conquer" petty nationalism to manipulate the proles in Germany and France and divert their attention away from the real problem, that being the safety of all vaccines and the authoritarian NWO being created, and play on the anti-Brexit and anti-English prejudices of many of the proles to make them see only the AstraZeneca vaccine as the problem, but would accept any other.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...caremongering-citizens-REFUSE-Oxford-jab.html
 
Last edited:
I know its via Davidicke, nevertheless worth sharing. The Canadians again. Better to not add superlatives to that.

Conclusion
It was noted at the outset that this case was, in large measure, a repeat of the one put before Arbitrator Hayes. It is not, therefore, surprising that there is an identical outcome. Ultimately, I agree with Arbitrator Hayes: “There is scant scientific evidence concerning asymptomatic transmission, and, also, scant scientific evidence of the use of masks in reducing the transmission of the virus to patients” (at para. 329). To be sure, there is another authority on point, and the decision in that case deserves respect. But it was a different case with a completely different evidentiary focus. It is not a result that can be followed. 53 One day, an influenza vaccine like MMR may be developed, one that is close to 100% effective. To paraphrase Dr. Gardam, if a better vaccine and more robust literature about influenza-specific patient outcomes were available, the entire matter might be appropriately revisited. For the time being, however, the case for the VOM policy fails and the grievances allowed. I find St. Michael’s VOM policy contrary to the collective agreement and unreasonable. St. Michael’s is required, immediately, to rescind its VOM policy. I remain seized with respect to the implementation of this award

Source

Edit to add.
Who remembers Ottawans D.I.S.C.O?

Well there's the 2021 remix.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Back
Top