Evidence humans were created and traded as slaves, food, entertainment and material resources (IHASFEMR)

(thank you Dorothy and your dog Toto)
Hey, you see all sorts of things in history stuff that show strange monsters (wall carvings, stones carvings, vases etc), but then you see something on film or video that makes you think twice about what is really out there. Check out this video that I saw many years ago. It took a while to find it again. When I first came across it, it was only the phone recorded film by those guys who saw it, and I saved it into my playlists on youtube, but they disappeared, so either it was being censored or the person took it down for some reason. And now I find it in this format, so you'll need to go to the 00:50 part of the video to start watching what was captured on camera. When I first saw it, I went over it many times trying to figure out just what was taking place here. But this was a time when the veil was dropping and people were beginning to see behind the veil (thank you Dorothy and your dog Toto).

BTW pop quiz do you know why the dog was named Toto?
 
His method works out in the opposite direction as well. Chimpanzees could be a back-crossed hybrid of humans, as well as the (spoiler) pig. They have opposite features and when combined share a more complete feature set of a human, with the exception of bipedalism. So what if it's the reverse. What if the pig and chimpanzee is a hybrid from the original human?
The ABC's of Beth
After learning on the news that convicted child murderer Joseph Lipnip is set to be executed by lethal injection tonight for eating his son Thomas Lipnip, with his execution already drawing dozens more spectators, Bethremembers how she tried to cope with Tommy's disappearance by imagining that he got lost in her imaginary world called "Froopyland" and laughs at how silly it was. Rick then gets offended and reveals her "imaginary world" was actually one of his inventions created for her to play in. Beth realizes this means that Tommy might actually still be trapped in there and enters the realm with Rick. As Beth argues with Rick about spending her childhood in the "glorified chicken coop" instead of by his side, Rick is captured and nearly fed to the offspring of a giant bird-like creature, losing an arm in the process.

After fighting off the bird and her babies using a new mechanical arm, Rick and Beth discover that the lifeforms have been created and corrupted using human DNA, indicating that Tommy is indeed still trapped in the dimension. Beth theorizes that Tommy committed intercourse with the Froopyland creatures in order to produce children of which he would consume in order to sustain himself and Rick adds that it is also likely that the less appetizing of them (for Tommy) would worship Tommy as their god. Rick's assumption is revealed to be true once the two are captured by a group of Tommy's children (human/Froopyland creature hybrids). Upon being captured and brought before Tommy, they learn (to no surprise) that he has become the dimension's de facto leader and commits incest with his children as well as cannibalism to survive, just as Rick and Beth figured out.
 
Cross referencing a post from here: Interesting Videos

Link to the video

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwN3gtiFZZ0


Sounds like the 'cabbage patch babies' idea was an early film narrative (perhaps the earliest?) that explains orphans, and even hybrids..? Interesting logo the first film company 'Gaumont' has - a sun, with a 'G' in the middle. Anyway, some interesting research there.

La Fée aux Choux - Wikipedia wiki says 'arguably the world's first narrative film' - ie the first film with a story, not simply documenting events. That in itself would make it noteworthy - the first story in film is of babies in cabbage patches?!

The narrator also mentions the 'garbage pail kids' - a kids, sticker craze.
 
Last edited:
Cross referencing a post from here: Interesting Videos

Link to the video

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwN3gtiFZZ0


Sounds like the 'cabbage patch babies' idea was an early film narrative (perhaps the earliest?) that explains orphans, and even hybrids..? Interesting logo the first film company 'Gaumont' has - a sun, with a 'G' in the middle. Anyway, some interesting research there.

La Fée aux Choux - Wikipedia wiki says 'arguably the world's first narrative film' - ie the first film with a story, not simply documenting events. That in itself would make it noteworthy - the first story in film is of babies in cabbage patches?!

The narrator also mentions the 'garbage pail kids' - a kids, sticker craze.

Yeah, I watched this video this morning, as well. It's all just creepy the more you look at this stuff and look into it.
 
PS A french friend brought some 'cabbage' related French expressions to my notice.

'mon chou' - meaning my dear/love
'c'est chou' - meaning it's adorable

'bout d'chou': 'Cabbage bit' - meaning a small child
'être dans les choux': 'to be in the cabbages' - meaning to fail/to be in a daze
'Bête comme chou': - meaning dumb as a cabbage
'en avoir dans le chou': to have a lot in the cabbage - meaning to be smart
'rentrer dans le chou': to ram into the cabbage - meaning to be aggressive
'faire chou blanc'; 'to make white cabbage' - meaning to fail
'faire ses choux gras': to make your fat cabbages - meaning to make profit

.. child, fail/dumb and smart

Also, famous old comedy movie 'la soupe aux choux" is about two farmers who accidentally summon an alien through their flatulence as they were eating cabbage soup. The alien really liked the soup.

^ which is rather surprising too!
 
PS A french friend brought some 'cabbage' related French expressions to my notice.

'mon chou' - meaning my dear/love
'c'est chou' - meaning it's adorable

'bout d'chou': 'Cabbage bit' - meaning a small child
'être dans les choux': 'to be in the cabbages' - meaning to fail/to be in a daze
'Bête comme chou': - meaning dumb as a cabbage
'en avoir dans le chou': to have a lot in the cabbage - meaning to be smart
'rentrer dans le chou': to ram into the cabbage - meaning to be aggressive
'faire chou blanc'; 'to make white cabbage' - meaning to fail
'faire ses choux gras': to make your fat cabbages - meaning to make profit

.. child, fail/dumb and smart

Also, famous old comedy movie 'la soupe aux choux" is about two farmers who accidentally summon an alien through their flatulence as they were eating cabbage soup. The alien really liked the soup.

^ which is rather surprising too!
Made me recall the dish maque choux.


To quote the article I linked to:
"Most attribute maque choux to Louisiana and Cajun influence, but likely the dish originated much earlier, with Native Americans, and was adapted by settlers of Louisiana. The name, pronounced "mock shoe," could be from the Cajun French term maigrchou, translated as "thin child," referring to the addition of cream to thin out the dish. It could also be a French interpretation of the name for a Native American dish made with one of their indigenous "Three Sisters" crops, corn."
 
Cross referencing a post from here: Interesting Videos

Link to the video

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwN3gtiFZZ0


I'm watching this thing now and I'm almost finished, but the thoughts just came tumbling through after all that I was trying to put together of this strange plot.

They use a lot of reference to a calf or cow which could represent the constellation of Taurus with that giant red star Aldebaran, known through Theresa Talea's book "Eternal Humans and the Finite gods" to be a hub for controller or dominating aliens.

Also, the Black Sun is a symbol of the Nazi's but this black sun was known before the Nazi's were known...goes back into history, which can be found in the Supersoldier conversations (as well as in some of the book by Theresa Talea). But, you get it? The sauerkraut of Germans that comes from cabbage?

And talking about them, James Rink of Super Soldier Talk did a video recently, that I watched, where he asked a seer enslaved to the Mk Ultra system of death science technology of the fallen, asked her who that lady was that he saw in his youth, named Gloria Vanderbilt, at 1:45:44 of the video. She said she's a vampire, and that they use people for blood in order to stay young. And in these cabbage patch kids there is reference to heads being chopped off, or just pictures of little children's heads in a cabbage, and there is evidence out there of children being beheaded and the blood gathered for adrenochrome for those alien elite's use. Even a horrible video of two little children being interviewed and telling us how their father made them to help cut off the baby's head and then, they prepared it for dinner as well. Heinous things.

There are reference to snakes in those photos, which mean, scales, reptiles, cold blooded. There are also structures used in those films, the background, alien architecture. I can't explain because it goes off into never never land, but those two poles on each side of a curved in figure in the middle, like a figure 8 almost, or a vesica piscis design, which suck energy through the long poles or towers, or today...cell towers. And that ugly large thing of a being with teeth hanging out everywhere...and those guys that were serving a king? and now serving that huge monstrosity of a being by dumping large things in its mouth? Well, the illuminati have to pay their masters by culling life on the planet so that they can eat, and only through doing that are they able to stay wealthy because those creepers creep around invisibly through clouds and manipulate everyone and everything, or almost everyone and everything. Nevertheless, even so, the illuminati are not immune to being destroyed by their masters their own self, and hence, supposedly they not only do it for money but also for fear of their own lives, because they too are slaves to those intruders.

There is a lot of symbolism written into those pictures, and into those description...such as for example, the word "Fee" in French...sounds like, when translated into English, at face value, to pay a Fee.
 
Last edited:
I just bumped into a couple of random, yet relevant-ish things that made me think of this thread.

1.
burger | Etymology, origin and meaning of burger by etymonline
"native of Hamburg."
The meat product was so called by 1880 (as hamburg steak); if it was named for the German city no certain connection has ever been put forth, and there may not be one unless it be that Hamburg was a major port of departure for German immigrants to United States. An 1809 account of life and manners in Iceland says meat smoked in the chimney there is referred to as Hamburg beef.

"no certain connection has ever been put forth" Well, I guess its just one of those mysteries!

"meat smoked in the chimney there is referred to as Hamburg beef" Ho ho ho! There's got to be a Santa joke there somewhere... but maybe I've overcooked it :)

Also, the fact that burgers are typically beef, not ham, even in the etymology, means the idea that that the term is from pork meat doesn't really work.

2.
Tefillin - Wikipedia
Tefillin or phylacteries, are a set of small black leather boxes with leather straps containing scrolls of parchment inscribed with verses from the Torah.
The arm-tefillah (or shel yad [literally "of the hand"]) is placed on the upper (non-dominant) arm, and the strap wrapped around the forelimb, hand and middle finger; while the head-tefillah (or shel rosh [literally "of the head"]) is placed between the eyes at the boundary of the forehead and hair. They are intended to fulfill the Torah's instructions to maintain a continuous "sign" and "remembrance" of the Exodus from Egypt, as they were originally worn all day, from sunrise to sunset.

2 of the 4 parchments, in the black boxes, are these:
And the LORD spoke to Moses, saying: 'Sanctify to Me all the first-born, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of animal, it is Mine.' And Moses said to the people: 'Remember this day, in which you came out from Egypt, out of the house of bondage; for by strength of hand the LORD brought you out from this place; no leavened bread shall be eaten. This day you go forth in the Spring month. And it shall be when the LORD shall bring you into the land of the Canaanite, and the Hittite, and the Amorite, and the Hivite, and the Jebusite, which He swore unto your fathers to give you, a land flowing with milk and honey, that you shall keep this service in this month. Seven days you shall eat unleavened bread, and the seventh day shall be a feast to the LORD. Unleavened bread shall be eaten throughout the seven days; and no leavened bread shall be seen with you, neither shall there be leaven seen with you, in all your borders. And so shall you tell your son on that day, saying: It is because of that which the LORD did for me when I came forth out of Egypt. And it shall be for a sign for you upon your hand, and as a memorial between your eyes, that the law of the LORD may be in your mouth; for with a strong hand has the LORD brought you out of Egypt. You shalt therefore keep this ordinance in its season from year to year.

"'Sanctify to Me all the first-born, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of animal, it is Mine'". And so sayeth the Lord. You (well, I) have to wonder whether leavened bread has a secondary meaning.

When the LORD brings you into the land of the Canaanite, as He swore unto you and to your fathers, and shall give it to you, you shall set apart to the LORD all that opens the womb; every firstborn animal shall be the LORD'S. Every firstborn donkey you shall redeem with a sheep, and if you will not redeem it, then you shall break its neck; and all the first-born of man among your sons shall you redeem. And when your son asks you in time to come, saying: What is this? say to him: By strength of hand the LORD bring us out from Egypt, from the house of bondage; and when Pharaoh found it hard to let us go the LORD killed all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the first-born of man, and the first-born of animals; therefore I sacrifice to the LORD all males that open the womb, and redeem all my first-born sons. And it shall be for a sign upon your hand, and as "totafot" between your eyes; for by strength of hand the LORD brought us forth out of Egypt.

In this one, it sounds like more than ritual as the father has to explain the Lords right to the first born.

Both of these parchments sound contractual to me. In fact, all 4 parchments seem very contractual - the 2 above are the 'meat and bones' of the contract, whereas the other 2 (not quoted) relate to how the contract ought to be honoured and kept through the generations (the terms and conditions).

Both the above parchments are treating man in the same terms as livestock.

Why would you choose these contractual sounding parchments that promise the first born of man and animal to the Lord to be put into a black box that you use to pray with? Surely, you would have something more about how wonderful God is something.. it just seems so specific!

The use of the term 'remembrance' is also curious, and echoes the New Testament 'Lords supper', where Jesus says to eat bread and drink wine (signifying body and blood) in remembrance of him.

In all it sounds a bit like: 'remember the contract that was struck to give your first born, animal and man, to the Lord'.
 
Last edited:
I just bumped into a couple of random, yet relevant-ish things that made me think of this thread.

1.
burger | Etymology, origin and meaning of burger by etymonline
"native of Hamburg."


"no certain connection has ever been put forth" Well, I guess its just one of those mysteries!

"meat smoked in the chimney there is referred to as Hamburg beef" Ho ho ho! There's got to a Santa joke there somewhere... but maybe I've overcooked it :)

2.
Tefillin - Wikipedia


2 of the 4 parchments, in the black boxes, are these:


"'Sanctify to Me all the first-born, whatever opens the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of animal, it is Mine'". And so sayeth the Lord. You (well, I) have to wonder whether leavened bread has a secondary meaning.



In this one, it doesn't sound like this is just ritual.. more like the Lord hasn't claimed the right to the first born and so the child's father then has to explain?

Both of these parchments sound contractual to me. In fact, all 4 parchments seem very contractual - the 2 above are the 'meat and bones' of the contract, whereas the other 2 relate to how the contract ought to be honoured and kept through the generations.

Both the above parchments are treating man in the same terms as livestock.

Why would you choose these contractual sounding parchments that promise the first born of man and animal to the Lord to be put into a black box that you use to pray with? Surely, you would have something more about how wonderful God is something.. it just seems so specific!

Oh yea, wow.
When I read that book "Eternal Humans and the Finite gods" by Theresa Talea, she talks about that so called 'god' that people were taught to worship and which the Jews wrote their bible upon, and so many others...she says that it's the same alien group, the Jehovah group. Even Cosmic Awareness says the same thing, that they are not one person, they're a group of aliens. Anyway, in that Theresa Talea book, she says how that so called 'god' plays everyone to get what it wants. Even the bible said it. It said that Jehovah had hardened the heart of the Pharaoh. And so, all of them, the Egyptians and the Jews were the sacrifice for a bunch of alien vampires.

The Jews, or truly, the Hebrew of the bunch, say that they know very well that there is a Satanic influence, portion, part, that is in their family, and we all know that too, I mean, look at the banksters whose name we all know, and therefore they all protect themselves from them, in their own group. Anyway, those satanic beings who call themselves Jews and have infiltrated them, are those who are the performers of sacrifices to this very day, of children, and adults too. Well we know that there is a ring of peedo's you know? There are a lot of them from that evil group that the Hebrew's protect themselves as best they can from.

It's a bit strange that the cabbage is used as a symbol when we all know that German's use a lot of that sauerkraut as a main food staple in their diet, and now, yea, Hamburg, the name used for hamburger. Just a bit too synchronistic I'd say.
 
It's a bit strange that the cabbage is used as a symbol when we all know that German's use a lot of that sauerkraut as a main food staple in their diet, and now, yea, Hamburg, the name used for hamburger. Just a bit too synchronistic I'd say.
Frankfurt too for frankfurter! 🌭
 
Frankfurt too for frankfurter! 🌭

Oh my gosh, that is so weird. Yea, a hotdog, a Frankfurter. (A Frankenstein really. Who knows what they put into the food these days!)

Haha. I was just looking at some recipes on line when this cabbage caught my eye so I clicked on it to see...and look, they use a 'head' of cabbage with the 'top' chopped out and then it is filled with "milk."

"... A friend from Germany taught me how to cook cabbage ..."

Wow, I'm so grateful for that "edit" button, because I remembered those adrenochrome papers I saw a couple years ago and went to go find them, but I didn't find the one's from Germany which I was specifically looking for because they talked about the ages of the children they were using in their laboratory.
So this is from Telegram, at "Declassified Files - 10 Days Of Darkness" posted on January 31, 2021, and they wrote: "Adrenochrome Off Topic, but very substantial evidence on the existence of Children's organ harvesting for the drug that sinister individuals with power consume."

There are 9 photos, one of a brown glass dropper bottle with a label on it and the other 8 are paperwork photos. I hope this downloads from my computer.... Yes! They did.

AdrenochromePapers1.jpegAdrenochromePapers2.jpegAdrenochromePapers3.jpegAdrenochromePapers4.jpegAdrenochromePapers5.jpegAdrenochromePapers6.jpegAdrenochromePapers7.jpegAdrenochromePapers8.jpegAdrenochromePapers9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
Some more interesting notes on cabbage, some sources claim that in English it is derived via a fusion of two Latin words (caput + boce) further up the language chain, meaning head and bump respectively. The German word is kohl (so shopping at Cabbage's is a thing), and in some other languages, kool is used instead. There is certainly some weirdness to be explored when examining word origins for sure.

I wonder how many cities are named after cabbages?
 
Interesting thread. I’ve looked a little into our obscure origins. which have been blurred deliberately. There’s the ‘arrival’ of cro-magnon man around 40000 years ago, who differed from the Neanderthals…Scientists are always in search of the ‘missing link’ in the evolution to homo sapien from our ape ancestors. we are not really taught much on this subject, just expected to accept the current understanding and patiently wait for the answer to come. (Do farm animals ponder their genetics I wonder…?)
Switch to to the stories from ancient civilisations around the globe who attribute their recovery from cataclysm or emergence into the ‘light’ to mysterious teachers who came from across the sea or from the heavens…the Christian story of Noah’s ark…the amazing tech carved into indias temples…the sacred geometry built in temples around the globe…there is a pattern to all of this and I put forward the case that Aliens came across this planet long ago, nd it’s abundant life and resources and began to extract whatever it was they wanted…soon enough they thought that if they adjusted the design f the primates, they would have a willing slave labour source. This they did- perhaps the missing link really doesn’t exist, more of a lab grow DNA leap. Thus the Alieans could sit back and let their newly created slaves work for them. If you were wanting to set something like this up, what better control mechanism than making yourself a deity, the slaves god. occasional displays of your tech, the odd sacrifice of unruly slaves and hey presto you have control. Appoint some native overseers who are given extra privileges ( think Rothschilds, Rockefeller’s in our current age) and we the ‘owners’ f his planet can remain anonymous. Perhaps the overseers developed a taste for cruelty, or maybe the Owners taught it to them. Perhaps the owners are oblivious to the cruelty, I don’t know…but the continuous slaughter of the slaves clearly occurred and continues to this day. The exploitation of humans ( look up this word in Blacks Law Dictionary!) for their blood, flesh and fear is well reported - Yet heavily suppressed into marginal ‘conspiracy theory‘ by the very much complicit media or propaganda unit of the overseers. We exist because our DNA was altered. Garden of eden was a compound, a laboratory…Noah’s Arc was a DNA safe storage facility..we have been fed a bullshit history, are taught only how to work and our every sense is flattened with a continuos stream of propaganda, chemicals in our food and water, chemicals in our ’medicines’ ,we are kept deliberately in the dark much like animals on a farm. we are farmed. Our energy is harvested whilst living, ur deaths provide sustenance of some kind too…but threads like this are like wire cutters to the fences that hold us. Keep on being curious, keep on putting the pieces together.
 
Thus the Alieans could sit back and let their newly created slaves work for them. If you were wanting to set something like this up, what better control mechanism than making yourself a deity, the slaves god. occasional displays of your tech, the odd sacrifice of unruly slaves and hey presto you have control. Appoint some native overseers who are given extra privileges ( think Rothschilds,
This kind of explanation of enslavement by higher forms of intelligence sounds pretty but I feel it lacks substance.

In the first place, what does being more intelligent look like? If they are truly smarter. Couldn't they rationally explain their methods to us? Also, shouldn't they be able to directly force us into submission and not hide in the shadows? And if oppression isn't good for optimization, then wouldn't they just modify the slaves or find another species? The whole charade operation seems inefficient.

Also there seems to be nothing special that humans do except meddling with everything. Not just a sideshow for entertainment, or farmed for food, or made for labor. but at the center of life itself.
in that Theresa Talea book, she says how that so called 'god' plays everyone to get what it wants.
However, if we are part of the higher intelligence, it might make sense that the "god-head" is playing both sides (like left and right brain) in order to achieve desirable outcomes.
So what if it's the reverse. What if the pig and chimpanzee is a hybrid from the original human?
Taking it further, we can look at humans as a center of the intelligence problem as well as the center of genetics. The evolution tree places humans at the end of infinite genetic branches. We are completely without meaning and back on the "speck of dust" in the cosmos. in IHASFEMR, the objective absence of human value appears true. But that's the glass is half empty. There is also a good side to human life and there is value that questions whether we can be reduced to cattle.

Let's consider the opposite possibilities. What if humans are the center of intelligence? The highest state of existence. How would life form around such beings? What if farming and experimenting on one's own species is exactly what this higher form of intelligence would do?
1. That the problems and challenges presented to humans - illustrated by, for example, Doom paintings and church wall paintings - may have been created to develop humans. Like planned 'natural' selection. Or like a mandatory fitness gym with occasionally terminal outcomes. And to exercise their neurons:
If humans are the center of the cosmic intelligence, --whether it's considered artificial or engineered-- then it would be safe to assume they maximize the necessary instrumentation to develop and gain knowledge for the greater good. It is worth considering that it is not a computer that crunches numbers to get knowledge, but through life experiences that requires the greatest amount of joys and sufferings.
they were now being shut up themselves because there is no way for the people to not notice all the evil that has occurred.
It's sometimes hard to read stolen history with any optimism. So that is a nicer way to put things. We have to believe that truth will endure and good will come out from all the evil as the night is darkest before the dawn.
 
From Hidden Wirral Myths & Legends - The Wormhole Caves of New Brighton:
[Wirral's tunnels are]... a significant part of the local heritage that demands further enquiry, but the current writer (Gavin Chappell) frequently found himself up against a brick wall – sometimes literally – as he struggled to uncover the truth behind these rumours. Tunnels had been blocked up as soon as they were discovered; the publication of Mr Ruiz’s book apparently resulted in the blocking of all the Red Noses tunnel entrances; documents had mysteriously vanished from the reference sections of libraries whose staff were oddly brusque and unhelpful: finally, the writer was warned that all information on the subject had been suppressed by the local authority.

wormhole_caves_4607772093_472x321.jpgwormhole_caves_4607772110_307x212.jpg
Wormhole caves. More images at New Brighton Resort History

From the same page comes one of many descriptions of Poll Jones - AKA Mother Redcap - the red-capped hostellier famed for providing sailors with ham and eggs and private banking services:
Near Egremont, on the shore, there used to be a little low public-house, known as “Mother Redcap’s,” from the fact of the owner always wearing a red hood or cap. This public-house is still standing. I have often been in it. At that time there were no inner walls to divide the room on the upper floor; but only a few screens put up of about seven or eight feet in height to form apartments. The roof was not latted or plastered. When I last saw it, some twenty-five years or more ago, the joists and timbers were all open to view. Mother Redcap was a great favourite with the sailor-men and had their entire confidence. She had hiding-places for any number, and the men used, on returning from their voyages, to deposit with her their pay and prize-money, until they wanted it. It was known, or at least, very commonly believed, that Mother Redcap had in her possession enormous (for her) sums of money, hidden or put away somewhere; but where that somewhere was, it was never known; for, at her death, very little property was found in her possession, although only a few days before she was taken ill and died, a rich prize was brought into Liverpool which yielded every sailor on board at least a thousand pounds. Mother Redcap’s was swarming with sailors belonging to the privateer, directly after the vessel had come into port, and it was known that the old lady had received a good deal of the prize-money on their account, yet none of it was ever discovered. It is a very remarkable circumstance that some few years ago, I think about ten or twelve, but I forget exactly when, a quantity of money in spade-ace guineas was found in a cavity by the shore, not far from Mother Redcap’s.

mother_redcaps_4607772655_426x313.png
Mother Redcap's before its 1960 demolition. Source

Mother Redcap's site: (Google Maps), (Google Streetview), (OpenStreetMap), (Flickr images)

And:
Mother Redcap's was riddled with storage places, and was stoutly defended against attack: the door was five inches thick, and heavily reinforced, and the windows had shutters in a similar style. A customs officer who succeeded in entering the door could be precipitated into the cellar via a trapdoor on the threshold: forcing the door released a catch that opened the trapdoor.

Opening the front door closed off the entrance to one of the rooms, so visitors unfamiliar with the layout of the pub would either walk upstairs, or into the north room, unaware of a second ground floor room to the south. Numerous other hiding places were concealed in a well and in the chimney breast.

And:
By the 1950s the house had come into the possession of the Grimshaw family, whose son Wolfgang was a childhood friend of local historian Joseph “Pepe” Ruiz. In the latter’s book Beachcombers, Buttercreams and Smuggler’s Caves he relates his experiences of the building in its later years. One day the two boys decided to investigate the place, having become fascinated by local legends of smugglers. Digging in the south west corner they got down no more than a foot before their spades met a large sandstone slab, which further excavations revealed to be part of a set of steps leading downwards. They discovered a Celtic cross before night fell, and decided to return to their examination in the morning. Mysteriously, the cross vanished in the night.

And:
An article in the Wirral News stated that the developers found no trace of tunnels while building the nursing home (which replaced Mother Redcap's). However, Mrs Joan McCool of Rivington Road, who had worked at the Galleon Club in the fifties, asserted that the passages had existed. Behind the bar there had been a large bank with several tunnels that had been partially filled in with beer bottles. To the left of the bar there was a large slit, which would go unnoticed unless drawn to a visitor’s attention. This could be entered sideways, and led to a black, damp tunnel running behind the bar and seeming to go on much further.

The former proprietor of the Galleon Club, Mrs Inga Kneale, who used to run it with her former husband said that although she had never found tunnels “of any length” she was sure that they existed, and had always felt that someone was watching her. A previous owner had excavated the dance floor and even used a donkey while searching for the passages, but had been unsuccessful. A geo-physical survey in the mid seventies also failed to reveal any sign of tunnels (see next chapter).

A letter from Mrs Marion Fisher, former owner of an hotel in Wellington Road, mentioned a long stay resident, a builder, who had been working on Mother Redcap’s. Part of his work had been to fill in the well, which this account describes as “square and situated at the front of the house.” He told Mrs Fisher that down the well were three entrances to tunnels. Some of the tunnels had caved in, but the one that ran to St Hilary’s was intact. Another ran “under some nearby cottages” – presumably Seabank Cottages – while the third was “believed to run somewhere via the docks to an old Birkenhead church, possibly the priory”.

And:
in October 1974. Joseph Ruiz records that during the demolition a bulldozer that was knocking down the gents toilets (built on the south side of the house in the 1950s) fell through a hole in the ground, revealing – after it was pulled out by two other bulldozers – a large well with an entrance door part of the way down. Bottles, jars and flagons, some dating back to the eighteenth century, had been found during the demolition, some of which seem to correspond to the bottles that supposedly had been used to fill in the entrances to the tunnels. The workers recognised this as the famous “smugglers’ well” (the well to the south of the building mentioned above), and one man suggested his mates lower him down to the door and they inform the museum authorities. The foreman, however, insisted that the well be filled in, and threatened instant dismissal to anyone contacting the museum.

And finally:
In 1897, Gomer William was moved to consider the “striking contrast between Mother Red Cap’s humble hostelry” with its larcenous and piratical patrons “and the present beautiful home of the artist [Joseph Kitchingham]” which he regarded as “typical of the moral transformation” people had undergone over the past century.
I'd like to see the source of that reference. It seems fairly clear that a sustained effort has gone into achieving it.

Various pages linked to from Hidden Wirral Myths & Legends describe more Wirral tunnels:
And many more links on the site. They are also discussed in many other Wirral discussion sites, such as WikiWirral.

As you go looking for the termination points of these and other Wirral tunnels, you realise they are running around the former quarries on the flanks of Bidston Hill and under the hill itself. (Google Maps), (Google Streetview), (OpenStreetMap), (Flickr images)

Wikipedia speculates the name Bidston Hill comes from:
variations of the Old English name 'Beda' or 'Byddi' combined with ton, or from 'bytle stan', meaning a dwelling on a rock, or possibly a reference to a 'bidding-stone' for a venerated Saxon.

I'll go with 'bidding stone' partly because Wikipedia's final 'possible' explanations tend to be the IHASFEMR-supporting explanation. And partly because two more apparent bidding stones can be found at the mouth of the Clyde - also on the British west coast. Both are also associated with a witch or dominant woman, with sailors looking to trade for supplies, and nearby stones carved with alleged 'Viking' imagery.

And then we have the ownership of The Wirral's Bidston Hill. From Bidston Hill:
The clear association with the Mascys (Masseys) remained until the land was sold around the mid 14th Century to Henry, 4th Earl of Lancaster. This purchase was in proxy for the LeStranges, and on the Earl's death Roger LeStrange assumed possession of the Dunham barony. Legal claims by the descendents of Hamon Mascy V were raised against the LeStrange ownership but the status quo remained and on the 24th June 1347 John Le Strange, son of Roger, sold the manor of Bidston and other lands

Which of course reminds us of the word 'mass' again and another quarry site on the other side of England. From post-104859:
What there is a lot of documentation for is the alleged creation of Hunstanton by Hamon le Strange of the once-moated Old Hunstanton Hall. Which turns out to have seemingly unnecessary tunnel running from near its local church to, presumably the hall itself. But you can possibly connect the dots if you remember that 'Jamon' (with the 'J' pronounced as 'H') is Spanish for 'ham'. And that 'extranjero' is Spanish for 'foreign'. In fact the founding story of Hunstanton - and its architecture - is hammy.
 
Last edited:
From Hidden Wirral Myths & Legends - The Wormhole Caves of New Brighton:



From the same page comes one of many descriptions of Poll Jones - AKA Mother Redcap - the red-capped hostellier famed for providing sailors with ham and eggs and private banking services:


View attachment 26703
Mother Redcap's before its 1960 demolition. Source

Mother Redcap's site: (Google Maps), (Google Streetview), (OpenStreetMap), (Flickr images)

And:


And:


And:


And:


And finally:

I'd like to see the source of that reference. It seems fairly clear that a sustained effort has gone into achieving it.

Various pages linked to from Hidden Wirral Myths & Legends describe more Wirral tunnels:
And many more links on the site. They are also discussed in many other Wirral discussion sites, such as WikiWirral.

As you go looking for the termination points of these and other Wirral tunnels, you realise they are running around the former quarries on the flanks of Bidston Hill and under the hill itself. (Google Maps), (Google Streetview), (OpenStreetMap), (Flickr images)

Wikipedia speculates the name Bidston Hill comes from:


I'll go with 'bidding stone' partly because Wikipedia's final 'possible' explanations tend to be the IHASFEMR-supporting explanation. And partly because two more apparent bidding stones can be found at the mouth of the Clyde - also on the British west coast. Both are also associated with a witch or dominant woman, with sailors looking to trade for supplies, and nearby stones carved with alleged 'Viking' imagery.

And then we have the ownership of The Wirral's Bidston Hill. From Bidston Hill:


Which of course reminds us of the word 'mass' again and another quarry site on the other side of England. From post-104859:

A fantastic and fascinating write-up, usselo. One wonders how much we could discover if we had the time to just go digging. If I wasn't tied up with the banalities of the system that has been set up for us, I would be actively looking for buried things.
 
I'll go with 'bidding stone' partly because Wikipedia's final 'possible' explanations tend to be the IHASFEMR-supporting explanation. And partly because two more apparent bidding stones can be found at the mouth of the Clyde - also on the British west coast. Both are also associated with a witch or dominant woman, with sailors looking to trade for supplies, and nearby stones carved with alleged 'Viking' imagery.

And then we have the ownership of The Wirral's Bidston Hill. From Bidston Hill:


Which of course reminds us of the word 'mass' again and another quarry site on the other side of England. From post-104859:
More from Bidston:

The 'Cock-Pit' is another strange feature on the Hill to be found at the very northern end near to Bidston Hall. Consisting of a narrow circular trench, approximately 10 inches deep and 20 feet in diameter cut into the bare sandstone surrounded by tall gorse bushes. Thought to be the site where cock-fighting took place, it could also be the remains of a small gorse mill where gorse was crushed for animal feed. An old, disused mill would have been an ideal location for this illegal sport.
 
I've meant to add to earlier speculation about the mechanisms that trigger the loyalty loop. Seeing Frostychud's post reminded me to dig out additional evidence for high-contrast triggers.

Frostychud said:
Usselo took it a step further by breaking the loyalty loop down to its most concrete "switches": black and white colors, certain words, sounds, etc. This is eerily similar to what cults and intelligence agencies do to hollow out humans and make them slaves. I guess zombification was one of the "technologies" left to certain people by the Fallen Angels before they disappeared, along with makeup and metallurgy. It also suggest that we were indeed programmed at some point with "system override" commands. I believe that psychoanalysis, among other techniques, is a way of hacking back into the operating system and undoing the loyalty loops.

For background, previous loyalty loop posts were:
To summarise: the conjecture was that humans may have been designed to fail (intellectually) when confronted with high contrast stimulus, especially high contrast visual stimulus. That high contrast visuals (and perhaps other situations) put human processing into an intellectually weak mode by depriving the brain of nuance. I also speculated that high contrast creates a reduction in the information available for humans to use to assess the various risks in their situation.

Perhaps the rapid alternation between, for example, two contrasting colours moves the brain back and forth between two 'information positions', each of which is very limited in the options its presents. The only option seems to be: escape towards the other information position, to which the situation duly switches just a moment later.

It's a little hard to capture what I mean in words, especially because I am guessing. :)

Now, the additional evidence for this speculation:

John 'Boney' Fuller headed up post-WWI British Army training, helped develop Blitzkreig and was very involved with developing new technologies into the operational practice of mobile warfare. This is what you read about Fuller if you go looking. Who knows what's true...

He went on to help operationalise a secret flickering light technology codenamed the Canal Defence Light (CDL):

Download Video

Matilda. A mobile CDL. Source

Obviously, vertical slits in turrets remind us of castle technology. I'm inclined to think castles were not defensive structures but fortified stock-pens. They may have needed CDL aperture, or they may not.

We're not told why the CDL aperture had to be a slit or why it was vertical. So let's just focus on the flashing light and its ability to immobilise some soldiers.

The Tank Museum does not claim CDLs gave soldiers seizures, preferring to claim it disoriented them. But in Why do newsreaders make such a big deal about flash photography? the Guardian tells us flashing lights can provoke seizures in about 5% of British people.

So there does seem to be some aspect of the human brain (or perhaps just the British brain) that shuts down or goes AWOL when faced with high contrast lights. It may be that this is a vestige, a remnant of a deliberate back door.

Assuming what the media tells us is true, there seems to be enough faith in its effectiveness that the Russian military have continued working on it:

Download Video

Source: Link lost

My Russian isn't fantastic but I think the commentator says: "the British think CDLs were a flop. They will see the light."

So, no conclusions. Just some more evidence that the human (or hominid) brain seems to have a backdoor triggered by certain high contrast visual stimulus.
One wonders how much we could discover if we had the time to just go digging. If I wasn't tied up with the banalities of the system that has been set up for us, I would be actively looking for buried things.
Indeed. I used to think a civilian service requirement was another way of exploiting people. Working on IHASFEMR material has changed my mind. I now think we should all do our bit to maintain ourselves, each other (our society) and that our society should protect us from exploitation by others and itself. Somewhere in that mix should be a requirement that society makes resources available to investigate our past and present realities. If only to improve our understanding of our natures and our current position.
The 'Cock-Pit' is another strange feature on the Hill to be found at the very northern end near to Bidston Hall. Consisting of a narrow circular trench, approximately 10 inches deep and 20 feet in diameter cut into the bare sandstone surrounded by tall gorse bushes. Thought to be the site where cock-fighting took place, it could also be the remains of a small gorse mill where gorse was crushed for animal feed. An old, disused mill would have been an ideal location for this illegal sport.
Yes, that is interesting. I've seen a few references to cock-pits on hills. Or to 'Cock Hill', generally while looking for sites of rock-cut tombs.

Currently, my suspicion is that 'Cock' is derived from 'Koch' - a hint that these were originally cooking pits.
 
Last edited:
To summarise: the conjecture was that humans may have been designed to fail (intellectually) when confronted with high contrast stimulus, especially high contrast visual stimulus. That high contrast visuals (and perhaps other situations) put human processing into an intellectually weak mode by depriving the brain of nuance. I also speculated that high contrast creates a reduction in the information available for humans to use to assess the various risks in their situation.

Perhaps the rapid alternation between, for example, two contrasting colours moves the brain back and forth between two 'information positions', each of which is very limited in the options its presents. The only option seems to be: escape towards the other information position, to which the situation duly switches just a moment later.

This makes me think of the hypnosis techniques developed by Milton Erickson:

"A famous example of using resistance and a “double bind” occurred when Erickson was a boy. One day Erickson was helping his father coax a stubborn calf into the family barn. Try as they might to pull the calf into the barn, it didn’t budge. He realized that the calf wished to resist, accepted it, and pulled the opposite end on it’s tail – away from the barn. The new input of the boy pulling on the tail negated the father pulling on the head and the calf went into the barn. He used this as a classic psychological example of a double bind – where the subject becomes overwhelmed and is emotionally “pulled” in two conflicting directions. Thus, the confused individual successfully accepts one form of resistance and fails to respond to the other."

Note that the calf will sooner or later be eaten.

It is a little unusual to read this post today, because not two hours ago I was sitting at home in front of the fire when I heard someone banging on the door. I opened it, expecting to see my girlfriend home early or perhaps the neighbor asking for another onion. Instead I saw two cops, just like in the movies, brandishing badges. "Polizei. What is your name?" barked the man in front of me without saying hello. Short-circuited by this completely unexpected question and situation, I told him my name like a programmed automaton without thinking to inspect the badge. If he had asked me to empty my pockets, take off all my clothes, or bark like a dog, I probably would have done it without even knowing what I was doing. That is a humiliating thing to realize. I mention the badge inspection because this happened to me once before, in France, except the two "cops" were actually actors filming a hidden camera prank. One of these two cops was a "sexy lady cop" whose badge turned out to be an obvious plastic fake. Although I saw it, I was incapable of perceiving it until I had already been apprised of the deception, at which point I realized how obviously fake the setup was. In both cases there were two cops who alternated rapid-fire questions (although I suspect one cop would be enough to do the trick). There is a reason they use the "good cop/bad cop" routine to bully people. It turns out today's cops were looking for the guy on the floor below me. I have not done anything particularly illegal recently, but as both Kafka and Freud point out, we are all inherently guilty before the Law whether or not we have actually done anything wrong. One of the ways governments force compliance is by making the Law subtly or explicitly self-contradictory so that no matter what one does, one is always guilty of SOMETHING. Ultimately, legal "authority" is not grounded in some political or philosophical necessity as we learn in school but in the pre-installed feeling of shame that is inevitably activated when we are faced with avatars of Power. Or to put it in the language of this thread, the Law is just the elaboration of a mechanism, the loyalty loop, which exists solely to trap prey. It is a pure sadism-masochism hypnotic program, in my opinion, one that I now believe has been installed on purpose, thanks in large part to Usselo's work. Freud argued that criminals are, as a general rule, masochists who are unconsciously convinced of their own infinite existential guilt. As a result, they tend to seek out opportunities to be caught and punished; having their chronic free-floating, objectless guilt transformed into a concrete accusation, for a concrete crime, associated with a concrete punishment, is the only way for them to "contain" and metabolize this original "transcendental" guilt and shame.

Here are the last two paragraphs of Kafka's "The Trial". For those unfamiliar with the classic novel, it begins with the protagonist, K, being arrested without explanation. We then follow his absurd and confusing journey through the incomprehensible legal machine, which ends with him being executed, having never understood what the charges against him were. Notice again we have two executioners who engage in a hypnotic back-and-forth ritual.

Then one of the gentlemen opened his frock coat and from a sheath hanging on a belt stretched across his waistcoat he withdrew a long, thin, double-edged butcher's knife which he held up in the light to test its sharpness. The repulsive courtesies began once again, one of them passed the knife over K. to the other, who then passed it back over K. to the first. K. now knew it would be his duty to take the knife as it passed from hand to hand above him and thrust it into himself. But he did not do it, instead he twisted his neck, which was still free, and looked around. He was not able to show his full worth, was not able to take all the work from the official bodies, he lacked the rest of the strength he needed and this final shortcoming was the fault of whoever had denied it to him. As he looked round, he saw the top floor of the building next to the quarry. He saw how a light flickered on and the two halves of a window opened out, somebody, made weak and thin by the height and the distance, leant suddenly far out from it and stretched his arms out even further. Who was that? A friend? A good person? Somebody who was taking part? Somebody who wanted to help? Was he alone? Was it everyone? Would anyone help? Were there objections that had been forgotten? There must have been some. The logic cannot be refuted, but someone who wants to live will not resist it. Where was the judge he'd never seen? Where was the high court he had never reached? He raised both hands and spread out all his fingers.

But the hands of one of the gentleman were laid on K.'s throat, while the other pushed the knife deep into his heart and twisted it there, twice. As his eyesight failed, K. saw the two gentlemen cheek by cheek, close in front of his face, watching the result. "Like a dog!" he said, it was as if the shame of it should outlive him.


First, I believe that great artists are in contact with universal fantasies, experiences and memories, and I think it is possible that Kafka is here channeling a real collective trauma, that of submitting voluntarily to sacrifice by blade. Note also that the "ontological" feeling of shame is so strong that over the course of the novel the main character never once really questions whether or not he deserves what is happening to him. He just accepts it. It has been suggested here at IHASFEMR that the mechanism by which victims are tricked into self-sacrifice is religious exaltation. I would like to suggest that shame may be just as effective a means of pushing human cattle to offer themselves as literal food for their masters. Or even better, by creating two irreconcilable poles (shame and exaltation) between which the individual is made to cycle with no possibility of resolution, a "gap" is opened into which pure, naked, sadistic authority can be poured. Look at the paradox of Protestantism, for example. Grace cannot be "purchased" through either indulgences or good works. One either has divine grace or one does not and nothing can change that. You can't "buy" your way into Heaven. One would think that a theology like this would lead people to live apathetically or even anarchistically, but the contrary is true. Since there is no external mechanism in place to guarantee whether one has been saved or not (such as the blessing of a Catholic priest, corrupt or not), Protestants lose themselves in rule-following and virtue-signaling paroxysms. They have to, because they are trying to prove to themselves that they are saved, not to an institution limited by rules and traditions. Obviously they will never encounter any guarantee, so they must continue until they exhaust themselves in orgies of gratuitous morality and finally die. It's a much more clever mechanism for creating self-farming animals than, for example, Catholicism. Perhaps this Protestant logic could be described as not just a loyalty loop, but a triple octane self-catalyzing loyalty spiral. There is a reason the Northern European countries are so excited about the new Green Slave System: it is just Protestantism 2.0 with The Climate in the place of God. Make no mistake, many of the Germans who are freezing at home right now are pleased as punch that they have this new opportunity to prove to themselves and each other how good they are (not to mention the even more exciting opportunities for snitching it presents). The supplicants are (probably) not going to be eaten this time, but the demand from Power is the same as it always was: SACRIFICE YOURSELF. Actually, I do find convincing the theory that disembodied entities feed on energy released through suffering and death, and suspect that the "human on human" (or "unknown chimerical biological entity on human") cannibalism so horrifically detailed here is more a case of humans imitating gods than humans simply indulging in forbidden gourmandise. In other words, cannibalism has a "cargo cult" element since the disembodied "gods" never actually ate the flesh, as ancient texts make clear, just the energy. (This also explains why the Covid measures were more nakedly authoritarian in Catholic Europe. They had to be, since Catholics still function within an external loyalty loop paradigm rather than an internalized loyalty spiral. They need to be beaten every once in a while, otherwise they will cheat. Hence also the constant anti-Catholic propaganda: the NWO control grid is fundamentally Protestant in its functioning in that it is self-policing, masochistic, and horizontal, with very few priests necessary, whereas the older, more sadistic Catholic control structure depends on a hierarchy of priests that always risk being lured into venal corruption.)

There is also the hypnotic technique known as "anchoring", in which the would-be hypnotist presents two options to the target ("Do you want to eat at McDonald's or Burger King?") in order to lock him into a false binary choice and most of all, to subtly establish dominance. Abusive spouses alternate tenderness and violence to create a bond of complete hypnotic dependence. Derrida's "deconstruction" technique starts from the idea that all texts are structured around more or less hidden "binary oppositions" that subtly hypnotize the reader into identifying with the point of view of the author, which can also be seen as a form of submission. By finding and exploding these false "anchored" oppositions the reader is released from the tyranny of the author. (My endorsement of the deconstruction technique ends there because ironically, Derrida used this constant undermining of all pretension to objective signification to establish his own guru-like authority over his untethered followers.)

Usselo, moderators, I hope this post does not digress too far from the topic of loyalty loops in the context of IHASFEMR, if so I will move it elsewhere.
 
Last edited:
This makes me think of the hypnosis techniques developed by Milton Erickson:

"A famous example of using resistance and a “double bind” occurred when Erickson was a boy. One day Erickson was helping his father coax a stubborn calf into the family barn. Try as they might to pull the calf into the barn, it didn’t budge. He realized that the calf wished to resist, accepted it, and pulled the opposite end on it’s tail – away from the barn. The new input of the boy pulling on the tail negated the father pulling on the head and the calf went into the barn. He used this as a classic psychological example of a double bind – where the subject becomes overwhelmed and is emotionally “pulled” in two conflicting directions. Thus, the confused individual successfully accepts one form of resistance and fails to respond to the other."
You can speculate that hypnotism makes more subtle use of the same backdoor. That the hypnotist's swinging pendulum is another example of a contrast trigger.
Here are the last two paragraphs of Kafka's "The Trial". For those unfamiliar with the classic novel, it begins with the protagonist, K, being arrested without explanation. We then follow his absurd and confusing journey through the incomprehensible legal machine, which ends with him being executed, having never understood what the charges against him were. Notice again we have two executioners who engage in a hypnotic back-and-forth ritual.
And Kafka's The Knock at the Manor Gate. It says more about altars than my copy of The Laymans Guide to Church Furniture, its Associated Rituals and How to Perform Them.
There is also the hypnotic technique known as "anchoring", in which the would-be hypnotist presents two options to the target ("Do you want to eat at McDonald's or Burger King?") in order to lock him into a false binary choice
I didn't know it had a name. I've seen my stepbrother's wife do exactly that to him. I was amazed he went along with it because it was obviously manipulative. Perhaps he hadn't realised their marriage had failed. Or perhaps by then he had simply lost the will to resist.
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top