Exploring the technology of Prof. Nigel Cheese: Quantum Battery

@Fexus Congratulations and nice work!! It's very exciting to see others getting a chance to try this out. For how largely inexpensive the materials are I think it's a very worthwhile little experiment. 😁

*See This Thread; All is explained. Looks like there's some people here that have a greater understanding.
The Lost Key: Part 3 (Chapter 7)
Parts 1 & 2
The Lost Key: Part 1
The Lost Key: Part 2
I have been meaning to check out this series! First time I saw it I was highly intrigued but have had very little time to dive in yet. I'll see if I can this week. (y)(y)


Sounds like another potential good read. I'll have to debate if I want to buy one of the last 2 copies available. =]


Melborne AU 3 hours ago.
Wow just hours ago, crazy. I have NO doubt we will continue to see this phenomenon more and more. Like L.A. Marzulli has said almost countless times "UFOs are real, burgeoning, and not going away."
 
Prior to the vaunted F-117 was the SR-71; show in the link as a cut-away drawing. Now of course assume this illustration is anything but accurate despite a half century. https://i.pinimg.com/originals/f4/e0/62/f4e062b5e837f8d34421eb4db4b598d8.jpg

The SR-71 was the supposed apogee of technology by America's MIC's (Military Industrical Complex) at the time of creation, which is of course another lie, because it's creation was used as the cover story and pretext to develop other needed materials needed for other projects, like say for example the Alien Reproduction Machine, aka, the Flux Liner, and the one Mark McCandlish destoryed his career by releasing to the public in the form of an illustration a supposed man made reproduction of alien technology.

The SR-71 used many inventive products like dow corning glass. Yes, the same as the crock pot and also graphite was used and graphite was known as RAM, or Radar Absorbing Material. Graphite reacts to high frequency EM which theory says causes it to rotate it's atomic spin states. I'll leave it at that but this was then claimed to have the ability to reflect radar/microwaves. I'll invite you to think about that and what else it might be capable of doing.
I've been wanting to respond to this reply you posted last week for a while and am finally getting to it. I went to the flight museum near Seattle years back and by far the coolest part is the SR-71 they have there, particularly the engine taken out to get a closer look at, although who knows if what they had on display is real/accurate or not, but at the time I was impressed.

I had not heard the idea of the SR-71 being a cover story for other development efforts but from what I've learned over the years it does not surprise me. I'll have to look up the Flux Liner and Mark McCandlish because I don't remember hearing or reading about him before and that sounds like a interesting story. The material developments are compelling to say the least especially when you do get into the diamagnetic and EM properties of graphite (particularly pyrolytic graphite), hence one of the reasons I found some to test with. Interestingly, Nigel uses the term 'magnetic lenses' which he says copper and aluminum act as. So lately in my mind I'm wondering "Does diamagnetic or barely paramagnetic equate to having magnetic lensing properties?"

Examining the available imagery you can see the prolific use of triangular construction techniques in what looks like conventional truss structures and which a novice might attribute to conventional structural engineering for a vehicle of this type.

However, I previously mentioned the smallest theoretical particle is theorized as having the shape of a tetrahedron. The reason I made the experimental magnetic pressure test toy in the shape of a tetrahedron, and even though I didn't fully comprehend the reasons for doing so at the time I invented the experiment, I have now put the whole together with the assistance of Flexus, and the explanation is that atoms are driven by pressure mediation as a function of a counter-spatial dielectric field, of which magnetism is a coherent or pressurized form.

We could deduce from that concept that these signs show precisely this theory; a sphere/atom inducts dielectric energy from three points which then form a triangle inside the sphere. Notice how the ancient civil defense sign on the far right are precisely that while bomb shelter signs show three inwards focused triangles in yellow with three outward's focused black triangles inside a black sphere.
I had not encountered the tetrahedral shape of particles, nor the who concept of the triangle(s) within a sphere and I feel like it's so unfamiliar to me I can't really give much opinion. The signs having those symbols and geometry are interesting, and I wonder if there was an explanation for why they picked those? It's all super fascinating like most of the things you've brought up! I feel like I've got years worth of research to go off on from yourself, @Fexus and others on this thread. =]

All atoms are spherical. It's their dielectric plane's of induction which define the platonic solid formations inside them, which produces whatever kind of atom they are.
I had never quite conceived of atomic structure like this, but after seeing all the inertial/dielectric planes in the ferrocell from Ken's videos, as well as Nigel's MHI (very similar to the ferrocell) it makes a great deal of sense. I commend you for putting it so succinctly and think I'll adopt that as the best way to picture it for now.

See, the magnetic field is a pressure field the same way that the atmosphere is a pressure field. If you compress the atmosphere and release it out a small hole it's obvious that the air is being jetted out under pressure, but walking around in the air you don't feel the atmospheric pressure, and the counter~spatial dielectric field is like the atmosphere, whereas a magnet is akin to a compressor, and the magnetic field is the pressure being jetted out from that field: Probably a really poor analogy since the magnetic field coming off a magnet does so only around the exterior edge's of the poles.
I don't know... it sounds like another pretty great analogy to me, especially with all the great research Ken has done and written about. When we're talking about the nature and "fabric" of reality I don't think anyone has the absolute perfect analogy. I appreciate everyone who is willing/brave enough to put their concepts out there to be pondered and tested, especially when the remain open to criticism. Oscillation pressure fields and gradients make a lot more sense to me than tiny particle soup moving at inconceivable speeds.

I came up with this toy in order to prove out Ken Wheeler's statement that the magnetic field is a pressure field, and I did that even though magnetic pressures are common knowledge, and that's because the simple ideas that magnets produce a pressure field is something not taught and which needs to be visually demonstrated to be understood. I might also have concocted this toy for other reasons involving flying triangles and black holes on my fridge; probably helps to chill as well. Flying Triangles And The Black Holes On My Fridge
The diamagnetic glider idea sound cool. Do you happen to have any video of it going back and forth over the paper tent portion? Also, is that article you linked to one that you wrote? I keep starting to read it then get distracted with something, but I do plan on getting all the way through. :)

In my head is a thought that time is of the essence, that it is more important to get this thing of Nigel's working in sort of useful fashion and here's why: There's an old saying; "don't waste time fighting the system; invent a new one."
It certainly does seem like "Reset" is on the horizon and I'm definitely not thrilled about the prospects. Especially with turd-o up in Canada spilling the beans on the "great" reset they want. I think it's wise to live a relatively prepared lifestyle and pursue self-reliance in all its forms where possible. My testing of Nigel's QB, and eventually other technologies I hope, is all about self-reliance and removing dependence from corrupt and broken systems. I think I mildly care about proving it to some people, but only to those who are open-minded to it. I've lived enough years to be done wasting my time trying to answer eternal skeptics.

What we are witness to is the creation of a two tiered civilization. It is one that has been under construction for a long time, and since 1996 it's fleet of coal plant carbon waste spraying tanker planes have been filling the skys of earth in order to facilitate this and other machines to make trips back and forth between their off world space stations and the planet.
I've talked with my wife and a couple other people about this idea, which I do think is real at this point. Whether I think they are off world or just somewhere else in or just beyond our realm I won't get into hear, but the important part is that there seems to be significant evidence of another tier of civilization kept separate and greatly advanced compared to us. Deep theories I totally enjoy pondering and discussing. (y)

That machine you attached the picture of I have not seen before nor do I really know anything about. I may hit you up over PM to ask you a bit more about it.
 
I had not heard the idea of the SR-71 being a cover story
Of course that's my interpretation due to a large amount of circumstantial evidence, along with eye witness testimony that's come to light since, and which describes the development of man made FTL (faster than light) capable vehicles, evidence which says that FTL vehicles have been in existence since no later than the early 1960's and very likely since the late to mid 50's, and undoubtedly by both the Soviets and the USA.

We know from the stories provided about early crashed saucers that radar is what brought these down, and so by extension you might then also question the vast armada's of so-called Radar Picket ships that once existed on both sides of the cold war, as well as the those war reports involving UFO's from the Vietnam War. Obviously these ships were used for the stated purposes but that doesn't mean that's all they were built to do. If there's aliens, be they space faring critters as seems likely, and also intelligent ones, as also seems likely, then these ships may have been used to hunt them with the express purpose of capturing samples of either kind.

RUSSIANS EXPAND SPACE TRACKING (Published 1971)

"Kosmonavt Yuri Gagarin" Soviet spacecraft tracking ship.​

Space tracking ship.png


25 years ago, a 5,000-pound Russian capsule hurtled into the Washington coast | The Seattle Times

This image at the link is of a supposed Soviet Capsule that crashed into Washington State's Puget Sound in 1971
https://static.seattletimes.com/wp-...2ed6-baa3-11e7-a2c6-40ecc5323418-1020x718.jpg

The national UFO Reporting Center has hundreds of reports of spherical balls of all sizes on record. More recent ones being about the size of basketballs and or beachballs and sometimes seen cruising along at tree top height or even at light pole level slipping through neighborhoods.


A more solid example might be the photos's taken by the late Rex Heflin, and which undoubtedly show the training vehicle which a former Marine Capt. testified he trained pilots on; that testimony is on record and video. Not going to search for it but it's there on scrub tube. The Heflin photo's have been studied hundreds of times but now have been give the stamp of being completely authentic, like they could ever have been anything but that. I mean just look at the location and the time and the manufacturing leaders in aviation and where they are located. It's not rocket science, it's ether science, and then it's alien only when it's not man made UFO's.
Heflin's 1965 photos finally validated

So to continue; a vehicle like the Flux Liner, or ARV (Alien Reproduction Vehicle), required the development of new materials, and so you need a rational explanation to provide to research & development scientists and materials engineers, and without providing so much as a hint of any other potential application: A machine like the SR-71 would have been ideal for that application.

The more you understand, the more visible this sort of covert application becomes, it's a past time for some people now days, but generally speaking the whole idea is to provide rational explanations for applications such that no ordinary person would even imagine that there might be another purpose.

To even suspect that another purpose might have existed for the development of materials back in that epoch of time when the CIA issued a design requirement for the SR-71 would have required you to have an extreme imagination and to really have your game up. To do that you would have had to have been seriously, seriously, juiced up with the powers that be: You would have had to have been someone like Joe Parr.

In Joe's case he was apparently supervised by round the clockB-52' Bombers that flew over his head while he worked on whatever it was that he worked on in the South Pole: Presumably thermonuclear armed ones. I mean why else would you have strategic bombers flying round the clock specially over his work site; like what, to motivate you to work harder?

Joe Par was an electrical engineer, which is an understatement in the extreme, and he is also the inventor of the gamma ray transducer. I mean seriously: A gamma ray transducer? I'm well in to my 60's and if you think about what Joe Parr was doing and knew when I was in grade school before Kennedy was President is a tour de force of how little we all really know.

Joe knew for example there was a machine which could stop gamma rays, gravity, and who knows what else, and what's more is that the rudiments of the machine isn't that difficult to make. Controlling it might be another matter.

All this was going on when I wasn't even in third grade, when America was still segregated, when being a homosexual was a crime you could get sent to prison for, and when the Idiot TV was showing us land of the Giants, Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea, and the best of all, Lost in Space.

This is what the system has always done. In the 30's it showed people the Keystone Cops while reality of the time isn't depicted for another 80 years by movies like the "Untouchables," and "Public Enemy." So by analogy we can take it that the reality is nothing like StarTrek, because for one thing there is no warping of space because space has no properties (Tesla), and so instead the reality is it's Star Wars and John Carpenters; "They Live", which the late Roddy Piper said wasn't a science fiction film but rather a documentary.

If you are not familiar with the work that Joe Parr did you would be well advised to save whatever you can scrape together from the archived information that his good friend Dr. John de Salvo has saved while it still exists in the public domain.
Great Pyramid of Giza Research Association

Keep in mind that we know more today and so as brilliant as Joe Parr was, he didn't have the work of Ken Wheeler to source to, but he might have had other work to source from, such that, whatever inspired Joes' experiments, those could only have originated from one of two possible sources; either Nazi Germany or from another world, which in the former case was said to have been derived from the ether via psychonauts communications with other beings, so in the end maybe it does all come down to alien contact, just not in a physical form.

Now it might not seem like it right at the moment, but all the things I'm throwing out at you are all tied to the Nigel QT Battery, and that's because you have an LED which is working on a counter spatial principle, even if it's not recognized, and magnets that are counter spatial devices so to speak. Somewhere Wheeler has a video where he talks about leds and counter space. What these idiots are calling the depletion zone in an LED is a counter spatial sinkhole, where light is produced by the induction of energy at that point of infinity, or the counterspatial point of induction. (* not sure but think that's ruffly about the size of it.)

Considering the epoch of time involving the SR-71 that would have been a virtual impossibility. I mean what kind of materials engineers at Dow Corning might have been thinking that the new glass they were trying to develop had any other applications than for crock pots. Can you imagine what kind of lose cannon screw ball you would have been seen as if you suggested any other possible use to your boss back in the 1960's? Probably end up in an insane asylum if you had; so far fetched would have the perception that everyone literally would have thought you completely and totally bonkers in the extreme.

So the machine itself, the engines to the SR-71 and so forth, those are all real and applied to that aircraft. After all it was flown by Airforce Pilots and maintained by the USAF in conjunction with oversight by the Central Intelligence Agency. I'm not super knowledgeable about this machine but the idea is that by looking at it and knowing other theoretical musings and explanations you can rationally suspect that more was afoot than just a super spy plane; and of course I think the closest any missile ever came was something like 16 miles away from that aircraft, so conventional weapons were totally impotent.

A lot more to respond to but really I'm off to bed and this is enough for a bit. I personally had a brief communication with Mr. McCandlish and bought a couple of his prints of the ARV. He had a ruff time after releasing this illustration. They destroyed his life for making that illustration and now it looks like they hired someone to murder him as well. He was very generous with his knowledge and I think history will record him better than the monkeys that mocked him in life. I know Mr. McCandlish was a devout Christian and I find it highly unlikely that he of all people would choose to use a shotgun to end his own life.

I'll have to look up the Flux Liner and Mark McCandlish

UPDATE ON THE DEATH OF MARK MCCANDLISH

Mark McCandlish, (probably murdered) at age 68 on April 13, 2021. He died in his home in Redding, CA with a shotgun blast to the head. He was going to testify at a Senate UFO/UAP meeting in June. His testimony would have destroyed any misleading UFO narratives and reveal the Tic Tac was actually a USAF SSP drone.

Zero Point The Story of Mark McCandlish and the Fluxliner​

BTW, James Allen who started this film died by a rare and fast spreading lung cancer. Murdering people using isotopes of radioactive particles was a common practice in the old Soviet Block. It is highly likely that James was murdered as well by this method using planted cigarettes impregnated with radioactive particles: (* Red Horizons: The True Story of Nicolae and Elena Ceausescus' Crimes, Lifestyle, and Corruption)

 
Last edited:
I was going to comment last night on some video's I've watched that are aimed at tearing down Nigel's QT Battery, as well as attacking Nigel himself. These character assassins say his QT battery is not mystery, that it's simply an ordinary voltalic battery, but the fact that voltaic action can light an led doesn't mean that is what is happening in the case of Nigel's QT Battery. It's a stupid explanation but one not many gulpers will question, so IMOP all of the video's aimed at denying there's anything worth investigating in Nigel's QT Battery are all deceitful liars engaged in counter intelligence. I seriously doubt those videos and clowns making them are there by random chance.

However, the one thing that struck me the most is that to my knowledge I don't know of any voltaic battery that requires you to become the ground, and as far as a battery also becoming self regulating, and also a controllable rheostat, well I'm sure those are things not shared by any voltaic battery.
 
Well, since this thread is also dedicated to proving Nigel right or wrong in general, I'd like to contribute with a little experiment that I have been doing based on Nigel's claims that the south pole is 1.2 times stronger than the north pole.
I do have to say that my setup isn't totally professional but I have done several testruns by now so I'm pretty confident when I say this:

I can't see any difference in strength between north and south pole.
Nigel's setup looked like this:
1649658531379.png
And below are two pictures of my setup. Each picture shows a different orientation. I don't have a good side by side comparison yet, sorry:
left.jpg
right.jpg

I 3D printed this little tower to suit the size of the magnets. It fits pretty much perfectly. There is very little wiggle-room for the magnets but still enough for them to smoothly glide up and down.
No matter the orientation of the magnets, the distance between the two stacks of 3 disc magnets always seems to come down to around 4cm. There sometimes are very very small and inconsistent differences of only one or two millimeters but that certainly does not satisfy Nigel's 20% difference. If one orientation displays 4cm, the other should be around either 4.8cm or 3.33cm according to Nigel's claims.

I will redo this experiment today with a fully greased up tower so as to minimize friction but as I said, I'm already very confident that the tower is displaying pretty accurate results. I'll be recording it more accurately and post an update.

Has anyone else here done this experiment by any chance?
 
Well, since this thread is also dedicated to proving Nigel right or wrong in general, I'd like to contribute with a little experiment that I have been doing based on Nigel's claims that the south pole is 1.2 times stronger than the north pole.
I do have to say that my setup isn't totally professional but I have done several testruns by now so I'm pretty confident when I say this:

I can't see any difference in strength between north and south pole.
Nigel's setup looked like this:
And below are two pictures of my setup. Each picture shows a different orientation. I don't have a good side by side comparison yet, sorry:

I 3D printed this little tower to suit the size of the magnets. It fits pretty much perfectly. There is very little wiggle-room for the magnets but still enough for them to smoothly glide up and down.
No matter the orientation of the magnets, the distance between the two stacks of 3 disc magnets always seems to come down to around 4cm. There sometimes are very very small and inconsistent differences of only one or two millimeters but that certainly does not satisfy Nigel's 20% difference. If one orientation displays 4cm, the other should be around either 4.8cm or 3.33cm according to Nigel's claims.

I will redo this experiment today with a fully greased up tower so as to minimize friction but as I said, I'm already very confident that the tower is displaying pretty accurate results. I'll be recording it more accurately and post an update.

Has anyone else here done this experiment by any chance?

I was going to comment on this but now you've done a physical test. I was thinking that possibly a magnetic deviation (* called inclination in aviation and shown on air sectionals) might have influenced Nigels original conclusions. That's a pretty far fetched and unlikely explanation because any such inclination should effect both polarities I would think but don't know for sure.
 
As promised, here is a video I made that is a little more thorough:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nELMsnBUnC0&ab_channel=Fexus


If you can't watch a video right now, the short of it is that both orientations were always locked in pretty much the same 5mm range. Nigel's claims regarding the strength ratio don't seem to be truthful but I'd really like for someone else to try this as well and make sure I didn't screw things up. However, as things stand, that is my conclusion and I won't change it unless I am convinced otherwise.
 
As promised, here is a video I made that is a little more thorough:


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nELMsnBUnC0&ab_channel=Fexus


If you can't watch a video right now, the short of it is that both orientations were always locked in pretty much the same 5mm range. Nigel's claims regarding the strength ratio don't seem to be truthful but I'd really like for someone else to try this as well and make sure I didn't screw things up. However, as things stand, that is my conclusion and I won't change it unless I am convinced otherwise.

Makes me wonder if he mixed up magnets. You could try that: use for example NP42 opposed by NP52's.
It's probably an error along those lines.
 
If you can't watch a video right now, the short of it is that both orientations were always locked in pretty much the same 5mm range. Nigel's claims regarding the strength ratio don't seem to be truthful but I'd really like for someone else to try this as well and make sure I didn't screw things up. However, as things stand, that is my conclusion and I won't change it unless I am convinced otherwise.
Great experiment! I appreciate you doing this one because its one that I had also been interested in trying. (y)

As for why you're seeing those results vs. Nigel's, I think @Dielectric is onto the right idea with the magnet strength. I remember Ken Wheeler talking about how the actual size of the field of higher powered magnets is physically smaller than weaker ones, like your old school ceramic refrigerator magnets for instance. It looks like the ones in Nigel's photos are some kind of steel or alloy and the way the material "manifests" the field could yield that higher pole strength difference. I'm purely speculating there though so it needs proper research. I could send the video to Nigel and ask him though; I've been curious about that photo of his myself. I need to go back and re-read that section of the book too.


Zero Point The Story of Mark McCandlish and the Fluxliner​


Thank you for the video link BTW! I've only had time to watch a little bit so far but hope to finish this week.

We know from the stories provided about early crashed saucers that radar is what brought these down, and so by extension you might then also question the vast armada's of so-called Radar Picket ships that once existed on both sides of the cold war, as well as the those war reports involving UFO's from the Vietnam War. Obviously these ships were used for the stated purposes but that doesn't mean that's all they were built to do. If there's aliens, be they space faring critters as seems likely, and also intelligent ones, as also seems likely, then these ships may have been used to hunt them with the express purpose of capturing samples of either kind.
RUSSIANS EXPAND SPACE TRACKING (Published 1971)

"Kosmonavt Yuri Gagarin" Soviet spacecraft tracking ship.​

space-tracking-ship-png.png
I had heard many years ago in some video about a UFO being brought down by radar but had completely forgot until you mentioned this. While I knew "SETI" type work has been going on for a long time, I had not heard of it being used particularly to target and down craft, which makes a LOT of sense to me when you think about how phased arrays work. Fascinating stuff. Our world is ENDLESSLY fascinating.


--------------------------

On the QB experimentation front I found out beeswax has been used as a dielectric in old capacitors so I'm going to try some that my wife has. I figure a wax like that could also easily be mixed/blended with substances that have dielectric properties opening up a realm of testing for wax, i.e. a dry version. I also had the recommendation for dielectric grease which is available at most auto parts stores and is worth a try. Nigel also recommends a dielectric fluid that I think would highly boost the galvanic effect of the QB, but I get the sense it would cause corrosion over time so I need to still ask him about it.

I'm also hoping to film a video this week charging and discharging that capacitor again a few times. The ~110V I was charging it with only seemed to get it to 32V+ which is not bad for a 25V capacitor, but it sounds like I can get it to at least double the set voltage all the way to 50V+. Next I need to bust out the breadboards and start with components to manage that capacitor load in a useful way, as well as measure the output from it by sending it through a 10-100K resistor and measuring the decay.

Oh! I don't know if I mentioned this already but I got titanium, nickel, brass, and pure iron foils. šŸ¤“ It turns out the titanium seems to suitably replace the zinc layer. The magnesium still provides one of the largest boosts in voltage so far. I haven't been able to find a suitable replacement, which annoys the perfectionist in my that wants each layer to be the same dimension. Aluminum in the right amount may work though so I need to find or buy some heavy duty kitchen foil. Might as well go make myself a hat while I'm at it!!! =D
 
Last edited:
On the QB experimentation front I found out beeswax has been used as a dielectric in old capacitors so I'm going to try some that my wife has. I figure a wax like that could also easily be mixed/blended with substances that have dielectric properties opening up a realm of testing for wax, i.e. a dry version. I also had the recommendation for dielectric grease which is available at most auto parts stores and is worth a try. Nigel also recommends a dielectric fluid that I think would highly boost the galvanic effect of the QB, but I get the sense it would cause corrosion over time so I need to still ask him about it.
Nothing is accidental and bee's in particular are critical critters to human survival. Bee's make these honeycombs but these honeycombs when overlaid produce cubes in hyperspace. There's a lot more going on with bee's and insects than I think we have any real understanding of. I believe this is an example of Julia Set's producing a hyper~spatial geometry.
Oh! I don't know if I mentioned this already but I got titanium, nickel, brass, and pure iron foils. šŸ¤“ It turns out the titanium seems to suitably replace the zinc layer. The magnesium still provides one of the largest boosts in voltage so far. I haven't been able to find a suitable replacement, which annoys the perfectionist in my that wants each layer to be the same dimension. Aluminum in the right amount may work though so I need to find or buy some heavy duty kitchen foil. Might as well go make myself a hat while I'm at it!!! =D
That's interesting. Just haven't had the time to look at the crystalline structures of the materials involved. However, UFO's have been seen dribbling burning material when in trouble, and of course magnesium is real trouble once it get's going.


 
Nothing is accidental and bee's in particular are critical critters to human survival. Bee's make these honeycombs but these honeycombs when overlaid produce cubes in hyperspace. There's a lot more going on with bee's and insects than I think we have any real understanding of. I believe this is an example of Julia Set's producing a hyper~spatial geometry.
I just learned about the hyperspace cube within honeycombs in the last year or so and found that TOTALLY fascinating. Just one of many reasons my wife and I hope to keep bees on our property eventually. Absolutely amazing little bio-machines bees are, especially the way bumble-bees fly.

Just haven't had the time to look at the crystalline structures of the materials involved. However, UFO's have been seen dribbling burning material when in trouble, and of course magnesium is real trouble once it get's going.
All of this fun talk of the geometric/crystalline structure of atoms and alloys really makes me want to pick up a copy of this book and see how helpful it might be for helping put together reasonable macroscopic models for testing with: Quantum Theory of Materials book
 
HEMP BATTERIES - some of the materials you can make from hemp might be useful in the battery described by the OP -


View: https://youtu.be/UN32y8McS4s


View: https://youtu.be/Yj_n_M7BMzs

(the article);
Earth power: hemp batteries better than lithium and graphene – UKCSC

The scientists ā€œcookedā€ leftover bast fibre – the inner bark of the plant that usually ends up in landfill – into carbon nanosheets in a process called hydrothermal synthesis. ā€œPeople ask me: why hemp? I say, why not?ā€ said Dr David Mitlin of Clarkson University, New York, in an interview with the BBC. ā€œWe’re making graphene-like materials for a thousandth of the price – and we’re doing it with waste.ā€


Dr Mitlin’s team recycled the fibres into supercapacitors, energy storage devices which are transforming the way electronics are powered. While conventional batteries store large reservoirs of energy and drip-feed it slowly, supercapacitors can rapidly discharge their entire load.


This makes them ideal in machines that require sharp bursts of power. In electric cars, for example, supercapacitors are used for regenerative braking. Releasing this torrent requires electrodes with high surface area, one of graphene’s many phenomenal properties.


Mitlin says that ā€œyou can do really interesting things with bio-wasteā€. With banana peels, for example, ā€œyou can turn them into a dense block of carbon – we call it pseudo-graphite – and that’s great for sodium-ion batteries. But if you look at hemp fibre its structure is the opposite – it makes sheets with high surface area – and that’s very conducive to supercapacitors.ā€
 
I have replicated this experiment successfully and have ventured into other metals and components. wowsers is all i will say. I will make a video within a months time. Most likely a compilation of all my little tests. My question is what is the NAME of Nigel Cheese's BOOK?!?! I have questions that appear to have answers in his book. Any help would be GREAT and i will make a video in due time.

When i first stumbled onto nigels video of the QB, I had/have all these ideas and then found this thread and you al were ALREADY on the direction i was so this is exciting and am looking forward to what this group finds out!!!

Thanks in advance!!!
 
The scientists ā€œcookedā€ leftover bast fibre – the inner bark of the plant that usually ends up in landfill – into carbon nanosheets in a process called hydrothermal synthesis. ā€œPeople ask me: why hemp? I say, why not?ā€ said Dr David Mitlin of Clarkson University, New York, in an interview with the BBC. ā€œWe’re making graphene-like materials for a thousandth of the price – and we’re doing it with waste.ā€


Dr Mitlin’s team recycled the fibres into supercapacitors, energy storage devices which are transforming the way electronics are powered. While conventional batteries store large reservoirs of energy and drip-feed it slowly, supercapacitors can rapidly discharge their entire load.


This makes them ideal in machines that require sharp bursts of power. In electric cars, for example, supercapacitors are used for regenerative braking. Releasing this torrent requires electrodes with high surface area, one of graphene’s many phenomenal properties.


Mitlin says that ā€œyou can do really interesting things with bio-wasteā€. With banana peels, for example, ā€œyou can turn them into a dense block of carbon – we call it pseudo-graphite – and that’s great for sodium-ion batteries. But if you look at hemp fibre its structure is the opposite – it makes sheets with high surface area – and that’s very conducive to supercapacitors.ā€
This is really impressive stuff, and I did not realize people were out there processing hemp into such a unique and useful material. I'm astounded at all the things we can do, process, and make with carbon in all it's many many forms.

I don't know if this would be useful for the paper/cellulose layer of the quantum batteries (QBs), but if a new material was created to replace that layer I bet this would be a beneficial additive. At the very least, the supercapacitors and sodium-ion batteries would be useful to store and use power generated from the QBs, or several other power generation technologies that Nigel has developed like PCAMs. In fact ever since learning more about supercapacitors the more I want to buy some for experimenting with. Talk about an inCREDIBLY useful component in electric vehicles. =]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have replicated this experiment successfully and have ventured into other metals and components. wowsers is all i will say. I will make a video within a months time. Most likely a compilation of all my little tests. My question is what is the NAME of Nigel Cheese's BOOK?!?! I have questions that appear to have answers in his book. Any help would be GREAT and i will make a video in due time.

When i first stumbled onto nigels video of the QB, I had/have all these ideas and then found this thread and you al were ALREADY on the direction i was so this is exciting and am looking forward to what this group finds out!!!

Thanks in advance!!!
Congratulations!! It would be fun to see more videos testing out this tech. (y)

Nigel's book I've come to find is not fully and completely available publicly. He has reasons for doing so I don't want to elaborate here, but he has released a great deal of material from his book. Since it's all still available through his LinkedIn page I don't imagine he would mind me sharing his PDFs here, but I'd like to check with him and make sure before I do. In the meantime I'll PM it to you so you can read what he has put out online. Fascinating stuff to say the least. =]

You did definitely stumble onto the right thread for active research on the QB. I've been a little distracted the last couple weeks on my testing, but hope to do more this week and maybe film something again this weekend or next week.

I did try some random beeswax my wife had as the dielectric/wet-paper layer but it did not work as I hoped and I only got 200-300mV. After finding out early capacitors were made using beeswax the thought was it could also work with the QB but I think it adds too much resistance. I still need to get some dielectric grease from the auto-parts store which I want to try "soaking" the paper in and try that as a more "dry" material. There are also some arrangement recommendations from Nigel that I think I understand but need time to sit down and test. If they work I'll post it up here.
 
Last edited:
This is really impressive stuff, and I did not realize people were out there processing hemp into such a unique and useful material. I'm astounded at all the things we can do, process, and make with carbon in all it's many many forms.

I don't know if this would be useful for the paper/cellulose layer of the quantum batteries (QBs), but if a new material was created to replace that layer I bet this would be a beneficial additive. At the very least, the supercapacitors and sodium-ion batteries would be useful to store and use power generated from the QBs, or several other power generation technologies that Nigel has developed like PCAMs. In fact ever since learning more about supercapacitors the more I want to buy some for experimenting with. Talk about an inCREDIBLY useful component in electric vehicles. =]
I have been LOOKING for this material because my mind went to the cardstock too. Can't find and sheets or anything but i haven't looked extensively either. Currently we have a wet cell QB. With the cardstock. I don't talk to nigel so i don't know if has developed one or not. I would love to find a dry cell version or figure it out. However, in the mean time it is absolutely exciting to see where the wet cells go. I went online and found a list of all diamagnetic and paramagnetic properties. I am unsure how MANY metals have been tested? I crossed this list with a list of the atomic structure of all elements and picked many with the hexagonal arrangement. one of each other category just to see. I also crossed both these lists with a chart that showed the ion energy capability of each element which dwindled down the metals even more. This is what i selected from and bought.

On Nigels PCAM's system, he admits it uses COMMON materials very abundant in earths crust. Since he is NOT using traditional means, and he chose silica for one component, i decided to buy a 1 inchx1mm silica chip. if i could of bought thinner i would have. I want to see if this does anything. i found some straight 25mmx25mmx1mm pyrolytic graphite and am CURIOUS to see how it performs. I bought and am waiting on graphite film in the mean time. I wanted thinner than 1mm but hey, you try what you can find right? lol @3D Printing Bear where do i find Nigels book?? or how to build a magtrap circuit?!?! i have an abundance of time to experiment.
This is really impressive stuff, and I did not realize people were out there processing hemp into such a unique and useful material. I'm astounded at all the things we can do, process, and make with carbon in all it's many many forms.

I don't know if this would be useful for the paper/cellulose layer of the quantum batteries (QBs), but if a new material was created to replace that layer I bet this would be a beneficial additive. At the very least, the supercapacitors and sodium-ion batteries would be useful to store and use power generated from the QBs, or several other power generation technologies that Nigel has developed like PCAMs. In fact ever since learning more about supercapacitors the more I want to buy some for experimenting with. Talk about an inCREDIBLY useful component in electric vehicles. =]


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Congratulations!! It would be fun to see more videos testing out this tech. (y)

Nigel's book I've come to find is not fully and completely available publicly. He has reasons for doing so I don't want to elaborate here, but he has released a great deal of material from his book. Since it's all still available through his LinkedIn page I don't imagine he would mind me sharing his PDFs here, but I'd like to check with him and make sure before I do. In the meantime I'll PM it to you so you can read what he has put out online. Fascinating stuff to say the least. =]

You did definitely stumble onto the right thread for active research on the QB. I've been a little distracted the last couple weeks on my testing, but hope to do more this week and maybe film something again this weekend or next week.

I did try some random beeswax my wife had as the dielectric/wet-paper layer but it did not work as I hoped and I only got 200-300mV. After finding out early capacitors were made using beeswax the thought was it could also work with the QB but I think it adds too much resistance. I still need to get some dielectric grease from the auto-parts store which I want to try "soaking" the paper in and try that as a more "dry" material. There are also some arrangement recommendations from Nigel that I think I understand but need time to sit down and test. If they work I'll post it up here.
I am grateful for any help and I understand Nigel's reasons and RESPECT him for doing so. I would do the same. Especially his PCAM's!! I can scratch beeswax off the list now lol I am stoked. I saw his pcams presentation and he showed a scaled down version of what the pcams looks like, without ALL the components he said, and it is intriguing. I have tried over the years with "alternative energy" and get frustrated. and then the BOOM happened inside and i really don't know what to say. I see things in my head and i saw nigels stuff and my head exploded with ideas but how to explain them, forgive me. i see a picture and describing the picture isn't always an easy task.

grateful and excited though!!!
 
Last edited:
I don't talk to nigel so i don't know if has developed one or not. I would love to find a dry cell version or figure it out. However, in the mean time it is absolutely exciting to see where the wet cells go.
He definitely does have a dry version of the battery, but there's only one video where he actually states so: Dry QB Video While I have been able to message back and forth with Nigel we haven't spoken over the phone yet and I haven't been quite so bold as to just ask what he used for dry materials. I may one of these days but in the meantime I'm trying to be more the "respectful student" starting to understand and test at a pace that makes sense to the professor. While I'm excited to figure out the dry version one of these days, I do know the technology is something he owns the IP for; so if someone learned that and wanted to start a business making QBs they would still need to work it out through Nigel. That being said I think he'd be pretty happy with that much R&D into his tech and would want to help such an entrepreneur get started.
 
Last edited:
He definitely does have a dry version of the battery, but there's only on video where he actually states so: Dry QB Video While I have been able to message back and forth with Nigel we haven't spoken over the phone yet and I haven't been quite so bold as to just ask what he used for dry materials. I may one of these days but in the meantime and trying to be more the "respectful student" trying to understand and test at a pace that makes sense to the professor. While I'm excited to figure out the dry version one of these days, I do know the technology is something he owns the IP for; so if someone learned that and wanted to start a business making QBs they would still need to work it out through Nigel. That being said I think he'd be pretty happy with that much R&D into his tech and would want to help such an entrepreneur get started.
I will be very honest. I don't want him to tell me. I want to go as FAR as i can handle and with as much patience as possible to understand what he has written. Figure it out myself. I love the mans approach and i dig his style of teaching. Give me some and LET ME figure it out. The "what is a magnet" pdf i am in LOVE with. This man deserves so much. I would enjoy chatting with him. Money? I could care less. I travel and help people. that's my mission and has been for 3 years. i am home by family for the summer and no need to work so i have a BUNCH of time to test stuff, purchase stuff, and test. I am open to any ideas. after this i am off to Colombia South America to further help people.
 
I went online and found a list of all diamagnetic and paramagnetic properties. I am unsure how MANY metals have been tested? I crossed this list with a list of the atomic structure of all elements and picked many with the hexagonal arrangement. one of each other category just to see. I also crossed both these lists with a chart that showed the ion energy capability of each element which dwindled down the metals even more.
It sounds like you went down a very similar path to myself and probably several other folks trying to test out this stuff. =] I went quickly to all the diamagnetic/paramagnetic charts of elements and materials, as well as various dielectrics. I like your thinking about trying elements with a hexagonal arrangement. I know for sure that geometry at the atomic scale absolutely impacts the performance of the QB energy flow.

So far I have used the cheap pyrolytic graphite paper as successful replacement for copper, however two properly aligned copper layers together seemed to yield about the same results as one layer of the graphite. I've also used aluminum foil as a lesser quality replacement for the magnesium strip. Lastly I have successfully replace the zinc layer with titanium and still had a good voltage (~1.7V for one cell) and that was also with the graphite. The other metal foils I have to try still are brass, nickel, and pure iron.

One suggestion Nigel had was keeping all the layers together but removing the small magnets and using larger ones on the outside to boost voltage. I'm not sure what I would then replace the thin magnet layer with so I figured I would try nickel first (since that's what the magnets are coated in anyway) then iron next. I'll also just try putting the copper/graphite layer right next to the zinc and see what happens, but imagine I need something to replace that space the thin magnet took up in the "stack", hence either the nickel or iron. We'll see!

Another recommendation when testing all of this is testing out using numbers within the Fibonacci sequence (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13...) because that pattern shows up all throughout magnetic field work and a LOT of Nigel's research. Apparently there's even something to aligning QB layers in a way that matches the sequence, going in two directions, but I have not been able to figure that out yet.

Since he is NOT using traditional means, and he chose silica for one component, i decided to buy a 1 inchx1mm silica chip. if i could of bought thinner i would have. I want to see if this does anything. i found some straight 25mmx25mmx1mm pyrolytic graphite and am CURIOUS to see how it performs.
The silica chip totally seems worth testing. Frankly SO many materials I think are worth a try since it's relatively simple getting thin layer of many things. I did get some "proper" pyrolytic graphite like you're described, which is about 1mm thick, however the pieces I got are pretty large for the magnets I'm testing with. That and the material seems very brittle so I'm not super keen on breaking or grinding it down to size, but I'd like to one of these days. I also think trying to make some relative thin bismuth foil and making discs from that would also be worth a try.
 
Last edited:
It sounds like you went down a very similar path to myself and probably several other folks trying to test out this stuff. =] I went quickly to all the diamagnetic/paramagnetic charts of elements and materials, as well as various dielectrics. I like your thinking about trying elements with a hexagonal arrangement. I know for sure that geometry at the atomic scale absolutely impacts the performance of the QB energy flow.

So far I have used the cheap pyrolytic graphite paper as successful replacement for copper, however two properly aligned copper layers together seemed to yield about the same results as one layer of the graphite. I've also used aluminum foil as a lesser quality replacement for the magnesium strip. Lastly I have successfully replace the zinc layer with titanium and still had a good voltage (~1.7V for one cell) and that was also with the graphite. The other metal foils I have to try still are brass, nickel, and pure iron.

One suggestion Nigel had was keeping all the layers together but removing the small magnets and using larger ones on the outside to boost voltage. I'm not sure what I would then replace the thin magnet layer with so I figured I would try nickel first (since that's what the magnets are coated in anyway) then iron next. I'll also just try putting the copper/graphite layer right next to the zinc and see what happens, but imagine I need something to replace that space the thin magnet took up in the "stack", hence either the nickel or iron. We'll see!

Another recommendation when testing all of this is testing out using numbers within the Fibonacci sequence (1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13...) because that pattern shows up all throughout magnetic field work and a LOT of Nigel's research. Apparently there's even something to aligning QB layers in a way that matches the sequence, going in two directions, but I have not been able to figure that out yet.
GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!! I swear man i been THINKING of the fibonacci sequence and the golden raito. The golden ratio is the 2/5:3/5 ratio of the magnets poles. but i saw something with Searl Energy creation years ago that worked off the Law of Squares.

I have some more exotic metals on the way. the attached pic is of ion energies across the element table. I cross my other two lists with this one. I have same as you but some others too. I will let you know.

I noticed that the magneisum is para (paramagnetic) and zinc&titanium is dia (diamagnetic) so my qustion is this. Do we get a higher voltage because of the "fight" between the 2 para and dia?
GET OUT OF MY HEAD!!!! I swear man i been THINKING of the fibonacci sequence and the golden raito. The golden ratio is the 2/5:3/5 ratio of the magnets poles. but i saw something with Searl Energy creation years ago that worked off the Law of Squares.

I have some more exotic metals on the way. the attached pic is of ion energies across the element table. I cross my other two lists with this one. I have same as you but some others too. I will let you know.

I noticed that the magneisum is para (paramagnetic) and zinc&titanium is dia (diamagnetic) so my qustion is this. Do we get a higher voltage because of the "fight" between the 2 para and dia?
These dots, on the website, you just scroll over and it tells you what element it is. Good for knowing IONS as i believe ions is what we are dealing with.
 

Attachments

  • IonizationEnergies.sp.gif
    IonizationEnergies.sp.gif
    17 KB · Views: 115
I have tried over the years with "alternative energy" and get frustrated. and then the BOOM happened inside and i really don't know what to say. I see things in my head and i saw nigels stuff and my head exploded with ideas but how to explain them, forgive me. i see a picture and describing the picture isn't always an easy task.
I sympathize with you on that. I've also tried researching alternative energy for well over a decade and rarely if ever does anything practical come out of it, nor anything I can really build or test at home. It was one of the many reasons why I was so stoked on Nigel's research since it was actually repeatable, and he was encouraging people to do it. The only other person I've known of to help get this kind of alternative tech into the hands of average researchers is the late John Bedini and his "simple schoolgirl circuit" that was sort of the core to his Bedini energizer.

No worries not being able to exactly articulate your ideas. I understand how all the thoughts can kind of whirlwind about in the mind. It might make sense in your head but then trying describe it in text is a whole other story. I think that's some of my confusion trying to full interpret some of the concepts behind Nigel's work. Its just SUCH a deep subject that we are never ever taught in school.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top