Flat Earth

[_harris]

View attachment 35345

the "horizon" in those first 2 images is called a false horizon. just mist, you can't see the terrain, it proves absolutely NOTHING unless you're easily persuaded by some MSPaint line drawing.

3rd image however - we can SEE THE CURVE... there's 0 pixel of sky between the line centre and sea, and at least 1 pixel of sky beneath either end of the line... I've also done this same image when at the coast. same result

 

[_harris]

The new Tycho's system developed by Simon Shack destroys the Heliocentric/Newtonian system totally , the heliocentric model is defunct . Bought the book 18 month's ago . Nice model - the 2nd chapter is not titled screw flat earth by the way . His brilliant destruction of the heliocentric model is very thorough.

never said it was, I was saying "screw flat earth" because all the astronomical anomalies that flat earth folks like to bring up are explained away much more simply by the Shack/Brahe Tychos model!

My absolute favourite part is the comparison of our "solar disc" model with every other observable solar system... they are ALL binary systems that look a lot like Brahe's model (and he knew absolutely zero about binary systems back then)... are we the only solar disc system? haha

It's a hard concept to fully grasp as it would require a full rewrite of astrophysics. I'm down for that!

 

[_harris]

View attachment 35383

this model can NEVER explain:
how Southern Hemisphere can never see Polaris
how the stars appear to rotate in opposing directions in N vs S hemispehere
Or how seasons work.

globe life baby.

 

[ants]

this model can NEVER explain:
how Southern Hemisphere can never see Polaris
how the stars appear to rotate in opposing directions in N vs S hemispehere
Or how seasons work.

globe life baby.

If you're standing at the North Pole, Polaris will be 90 degrees directly overhead. And if you you were to then start traveling southwards,- the law of perspective will cause Polaris to gradually decline in the sky..

 

[ThomasVonDerBosch]

I think everything is much closer than we’ve been led to believe. NASA lies. The Disney of Space.

Not seeing Polaris from south of the equator might be a factor of the light from those stars not getting through the atmosphere from that distance. Or just disappeared into perspective.

The same can be done for the Sun. Take an angle at solar noon on the Summer solstice from wherever you are. Knowing the distance to the Tropic, Trig gives the height of the Sun.
I would like to see pictures and angles of Polaris from various latitudes starting from say the Arctic circle working down to where it can’t be seen. With some simple Trig we should be able to determine it’s height.

IMHO The function of the cosmos is an incredible balance of titanic proportions. For all that to be set into motion is a Great Work of Divine intention

 

[FarewellAngelina]

never said it was, I was saying "screw flat earth" because all the astronomical anomalies that flat earth folks like to bring up are explained away much more simply by the Shack/Brahe Tychos model!

My absolute favourite part is the comparison of our "solar disc" model with every other observable solar system... they are ALL binary systems that look a lot like Brahe's model (and he knew absolutely zero about binary systems back then)... are we the only solar disc system? haha

It's a hard concept to fully grasp as it would require a full rewrite of astrophysics. I'm down for that!

I like the new Tychonic system - it is far superior to the Copernican/Newtonian system and it wouldn't be as problematic as one thinks to rewrite astrophysics.

Haley's comets irregular (unexplainable by Newtonian gravitation/Kepler theory) orbit is shown to be entirely predictable using the new tychos system - as are all planetary movements. Goodbye gravity as an attractive force between mass acting over distance by some unknown means.

This begs the question " why are binary systems shown , even in Simons system, to be dancing around a centre of mass ?" Minor detail really.

Mainstream theory has earth cavorting around the sun at 66,600 mph - Thyconic model has earth walking at a stately 1mph. Why not stationary ?!

Did you know no trigonometric survey ever takes ,or finds earth curvature over an area of 100sq mls .

 

[Breizh]

I agree that the largest, most glaring holes are in the heliocentric model itself. That’s not to say that there aren’t inconsistencies with the globe model though; namely the observable curvature and some well documented observable distances. It could just be a far larger globe though, and wouldn’t be the first time that the truth was part of the lie.

I'm inclined to the idea that - and pardon my use of paraphrasing - the earth is a sphere in 3D yet in higher D's it can be interpreted as a plane (or other). This reconciles the flat/globe interpretations and aligns with the majority of traditional interpretations and depictions of the world. The underlying physics is multidimensional in nature and accounts for all phenomena, even the inexplicable.

Ultimately, sphere or plane is a matter of perspective, both are valid ... and the plasma moon map is interesting indeed - an artefact image "burnt into the screen" or a real live "reflection"? There are old tales of a time when the earth had no moon.

...the Shack/Brahe Tychos model.

My absolute favourite part is the comparison of our "solar disc" model with every other observable solar system... they are ALL binary systems that look a lot like Brahe's model

There is someone who has been sharing images for at least 20 years on what he calls the binary solar system. His monthly images are then compared to sky photos taken by the public. There's been countless matches. Objects causing characteristic patterns, weather patterns and so on. The "planetary" objects tend to have characteristic atmospheres which are recognisable, especially when close by.

SOL is the sun. Objects passing infront will cause it's light to "bend" or appear "pinched" to the observer. The 1st photo is left of sun, 2nd photo is right of sun.

I hesitated to include this but it's relevant. This is not photoshoped or artificial, I've no time for that stuff.

 

[MJ.nfl]

 

[Seiya]

I would love to know how the world we live in works, because I'm curious to know how things work. But I know what it isn't.

Before, reality was hidden behind a locked door with an alarm, security, and a dog. Today, there is not even a door frame.

Politics FAKE
Education FAKE
Diseases FAKE
Healthcare system FAKE
Legal/Judicial system FAKE
Religions FAKE
Media FAKE
Science FAKE
History FAKE
Financial system FAKE
War FAKE...
It's all so ridiculous that anyone who still believes living on a ball spinning at high speed into infinity, it's a lost cause.

Space FAKE. It's the most obvious of all, but it's the key to breaking the spell and making you see everything else. The impact and consequences it has on each of us are enormous and unprecedented. Even if you have no interest in the area. I consider it pure evil and condemn all who participate in this lie.

Watch this video and tell me what your perception tells you.


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7iqqokBxYIY


I know the difference between things moving independently compared to millions of things moving symmetrically at the same time and speed every day.

Isn't it obvious?
It's not the lights (stars) that are moving freely in that area (space) or in the sky, it's the sky itself that moves. The lights (stars) are a individual separate things from the sky, but rather are part of its very structure.
The stars are not individual objects (for lack of a better term), they are features of a single object that I also call, for lack of a better term, the sky.

It's like being in a large blackout room, and around you there's a black fabric with holes and a light pointed at the back of that fabric moving, you're inside. Even if the only thing you see is the light passing through, you know that it's not hundreds of individual lights moving in perfect synchronicity.

The moon must be a reflection or a refracted projection. Not only because it emits light, but also "cold" light. As we know light is a frequency. You can measured the temperature of 2 identical object under moon light and other don't in the same environment and they will have different temperature. Furthermore, the image of the moon is 2D and static. It moves, rotates, becomes partially visible or totally invisible, changes color, grows and shrinks, but the image is always the same.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q7xlnX13Qi8



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcUhAA5-j00

The Sun is not a ball of fire and you don't need much intelligence or study to know that. Have you ever gotten a tan sitting in front of a fireplace or any fire? No

If you want to get a tan but don't have enough sun where you live, what do you do?

And what does this machine use to tan you? That's right.
So when those Cambridge-certified charlatans teach you that the sun is a giant ball of fire in an infinite imaginary world, you laugh first and say, "No, it's not." You don't need to know what the sun is to know that it's not what they're saying.


I believe the Sun works similarly to the moon. But the Sun we see is a projection of the real sun (invisible to us) formed in the electric magnetic torus and its interaction with the amount of moisture in the air.

We don't live in a flat disc flying through space. We live in a hole, a crater.

The Egyptians, who are actually the Irish or Aryans, explained all of this. The Eye of Ra is simply a way of teaching people allegorically. It's not the Devil, as they want you to believe. They don't care what they need to do to prevent you from knowing the truth about the world you live in, because if you know, they won't be able to control and enslave you anymore.

 

[grav]

Watch this video and tell me what your perception tells you.

That post is a killer! You cover so many ideas that it's hard to respond to your well-expressed points.

As for my perception of the moving skylights, I've been trying to understand how it all works, but . . . it still eludes my feeble comprehension.
I've been studying FE for over 10 years now. The stationary plane is an easy landscape to prove.
The dome, though, is far beyond our abilities to explore. And the Body Scientific does all it can to hide the true nature of What Lies Above. What are the stars?
Especially Polaris, the pole star, North Star. What is it and how high is it?
It seems do-able to calculate the altitude if stars by triangulating with "known" distances on earth.
That math, btw, is only possible on a flat earth, since triangles need a level base along which to draw a right angle.

I have not found any sources that give clear answers or good memes that reveal and illustrate the dimensions of the dome/s.
This one, Flat Earth Facts - Flat Earth University, suggests "a parabolic peak height of 6216.3mi/10004km."

Voliva estimated 3000 miles to the sun.
On the Flat Earth, How High is the Sun?

But what about the other celestial lights?
And if the so-called 7 heavens actually describe multiple layers of domes in the firmament, what distances separate them and what is the highest point?
Nasa conducted "atom" bomb tests in the 1960s to map our first dome. But the ones above ?? I don't see how.

One guess is the "celestial sphere" that the god Atlas holds up.
If a sphere is perfectly round, perhaps the universe has the same diameter as the flat earth. which is ~24,500 miles. The radius would be half, rounded ~12,000 miles.
That might indeed be the "outer limit" of the toroidal earth realm, where our planette forms an accretion disk in the middle.
Above us is a hemisphere, which term is another clue the Body Scientific lets us see, while lying about the real big picture.

And then there's this --

kerrymagruder.com

kerrymagruder.com › bcp › sphere › lataltpolaris.htm

POLARIS ALTITUDE - kerrymagruder.com
From ancient times sailors have known that the altitude of Polaris above the horizon is the same as one's latitude on Earth. Our latitude in Shawnee is 35 degrees north, and we find Polaris 35 degrees above the northern horizon. Similarly, to sail west at a constant latitude Columbus kept the north star at a constant altitude above the horizon.

Notice the words I underlined. The prefixes use the same letters.
alt-itude...... alt- is a Latin prefix meaning high
lat-itude.....lat- Latin for breadth, width
high and wide, huh?

 

[Just]

That post is a killer! You cover so many ideas that it's hard to respond to your well-expressed points.

As for my perception of the moving skylights, I've been trying to understand how it all works, but . . . it still eludes my feeble comprehension.
I've been studying FE for over 10 years now. The stationary plane is an easy landscape to prove.
The dome, though, is far beyond our abilities to explore. And the Body Scientific does all it can to hide the true nature of What Lies Above. What are the stars?
Especially Polaris, the pole star, North Star. What is it and how high is it?
It seems do-able to calculate the altitude if stars by triangulating with "known" distances on earth.
That math, btw, is only possible on a flat earth, since triangles need a level base along which to draw a right angle.

I have not found any sources that give clear answers or good memes that reveal and illustrate the dimensions of the dome/s.
This one, Flat Earth Facts - Flat Earth University, suggests "a parabolic peak height of 6216.3mi/10004km."

Voliva estimated 3000 miles to the sun.
On the Flat Earth, How High is the Sun?
View attachment 35442

But what about the other celestial lights?
And if the so-called 7 heavens actually describe multiple layers of domes in the firmament, what distances separate them and what is the highest point?
Nasa conducted "atom" bomb tests in the 1960s to map our first dome. But the ones above ?? I don't see how.

One guess is the "celestial sphere" that the god Atlas holds up.
If a sphere is perfectly round, perhaps the universe has the same diameter as the flat earth. which is ~24,500 miles. The radius would be half, rounded ~12,000 miles.
That might indeed be the "outer limit" of the toroidal earth realm, where our planette forms an accretion disk in the middle.
Above us is a hemisphere, which term is another clue the Body Scientific lets us see, while lying about the real big picture.

View attachment 35443



And then there's this --



Notice the words I underlined. The prefixes use the same letters.
alt-itude...... alt- is a Latin prefix meaning high
lat-itude.....lat- Latin for breadth, width
high and wide, huh?

In your plan of the earth plane you show the ice wall as a fixed part of the flat earth model but many people believe it’s the edge of the known part of the plane with the sun / moon system rotating and causing freezing on one side and thawing on the other side as it traverses the plane in a great year (25,750 year cycle). This is what’s known as the precession of the equinox. It’s so brilliantly explained in both Vibes of Cosmos by Stergios and Ewaranon’s Lost History of Flat Earth (skip to the last 30 minutes if you want to get an idea of how he believes it works). I found it mind-blowing and it has convinced me.

 

[Tomkat]

In your plan of the earth plane you show the ice wall as a fixed part of the flat earth model but many people believe it’s the edge of the known part of the plane with the sun / moon system rotating and causing freezing on one side and thawing on the other side as it traverses the plane in a great year (25,750 year cycle). This is what’s known as the precession of the equinox. It’s so brilliantly explained in both Vibes of Cosmos by Stergios and Ewaranon’s Lost History of Flat Earth (skip to the last 30 minutes if you want to get an idea of how he believes it works). I found it mind-blowing and it has convinced me.

Felt like chiming in...I agree with you Grav, really great post by Seiya, thx for that work Seiya. Just, re precession of equinox, I've tried to wrap my head around it before but so far it hasn't worked, feel free to give me your take on it if you're inclined....
For me, as a simulation person, I think it's easier to sort of detach and see FE from a different perspective. On FE, I see it from that starting point of this the ground, that's the sky etc. spherical trigonometry, line of sight measurements, things like artillery, all that. I know there is all that space stuff, but start here on the ground. I'm not computer savvy, but from my understanding, it could totally make sense to represent a globe or torus with a flat plane map in a virtual reality. Who knows maybe that is a source of some of what seem to be irreconcilable realities ie moon sun stars earth?
Don't know, but shout-out to this messy thread Grav

 

[Just]

Felt like chiming in...I agree with you Grav, really great post by Seiya, thx for that work Seiya. Just, re precession of equinox, I've tried to wrap my head around it before but so far it hasn't worked, feel free to give me your take on it if you're inclined....
For me, as a simulation person, I think it's easier to sort of detach and see FE from a different perspective. On FE, I see it from that starting point of this the ground, that's the sky etc. spherical trigonometry, line of sight measurements, things like artillery, all that. I know there is all that space stuff, but start here on the ground. I'm not computer savvy, but from my understanding, it could totally make sense to represent a globe or torus with a flat plane map in a virtual reality. Who knows maybe that is a source of some of what seem to be irreconcilable realities ie moon sun stars earth?
Don't know, but shout-out to this messy thread Grav

‘One aspect of precession is that every 72 years the stars appear to slip backward one degree out of 360 degrees in the circle of the ecliptic.’ This is from a Google search. It’s the world like a clock face. We’re in a ‘terrarium’ with our known world being a quarter of the plane. The warmed and habitable part of the earth gradually slips from being habitable to being frozen over. It’s so slow that we aren’t aware of it and are not made aware of it because tptb don’t want us to know. The sky above us (aka ‘the firmament’) shows a certain astrological / astronomical layout so it can be said that we’re in the age of Pisces / Aquarius going backwards through the twelve ‘star signs’. It’s impossible to find when the Age of Aquarius actually starts / started but I’d suspect that they know but would prefer us not to. Any shift in the ‘solar system’ will lead to melting of the lands beyond and will make the fictional area that they’re guarding and calling Antarctica reveal new territories. Will we ever learn what our world is? Just look at how they’ve vilified flat earthers for the answer to that. It’s one belief which is so shocking to all other alternative thinkers that people openly state that of course they don’t hold with that even though they will question so many other aspects of our reality. Finally I’ll just say I always went with the simulation theory till I realised how desperate they are to cover up FE - look at what recently happened to the Prague clock for desperate destruction of any evidence of the beauty of the created world we are living in. Call it a god or the Creator, something made this, and that above all is what they don’t want us to know hence the push towards ridiculing and discrediting all religions and, of course, astrology.

 

[Tomkat]

‘One aspect of precession is that every 72 years the stars appear to slip backward one degree out of 360 degrees in the circle of the ecliptic.’ This is from a Google search. It’s the world like a clock face. We’re in a ‘terrarium’ with our known world being a quarter of the plane. The warmed and habitable part of the earth gradually slips from being habitable to being frozen over. It’s so slow that we aren’t aware of it and are not made aware of it because tptb don’t want us to know. The sky above us (aka ‘the firmament’) shows a certain astrological / astronomical layout so it can be said that we’re in the age of Pisces / Aquarius going backwards through the twelve ‘star signs’. It’s impossible to find when the Age of Aquarius actually starts / started but I’d suspect that they know but would prefer us not to. Any shift in the ‘solar system’ will lead to melting of the lands beyond and will make the fictional area that they’re guarding and calling Antarctica reveal new territories. Will we ever learn what our world is? Just look at how they’ve vilified flat earthers for the answer to that. It’s one belief which is so shocking to all other alternative thinkers that people openly state that of course they don’t hold with that even though they will question so many other aspects of our reality. Finally I’ll just say I always went with the simulation theory till I realised how desperate they are to cover up FE - look at what recently happened to the Prague clock for desperate destruction of any evidence of the beauty of the created world we are living in. Call it a god or the Creator, something made this, and that above all is what they don’t want us to know hence the push towards ridiculing and discrediting all religions and, of course, astrology.

Ok, I'm gonna try to let it sink in. Thanks Just. For the record, I'm a total intelligent design creationist and simtard as well.

 

[Breizh]

Having watched some of Eric Dubay's videos it's likely that Earth is either significantly larger than estimated or a flat "3D-type" plane as depicted in all the traditional interpretations of the universe/realm and simplified here.

Correcting my earlier post:

I'm inclined to the idea that - and pardon my use of paraphrasing - the earth is a sphere in 3D yet in higher D's it can be interpreted as a plane (or other). This reconciles the flat/globe interpretations and aligns with the majority of traditional interpretations and depictions of the world (as a flat plane).

 

[MJ.nfl]

 

[reverendALC]

sun / moon system rotating and causing freezing on one side and thawing on the other side as it traverses the plane in a great year (25,750 year cycle). This is what’s known as the precession of the equinox.

The lost history of the flat earth, particularly that theory, shook me to my core.

 

[grav]

Having watched some of Eric Dubay's videos it's likely that Earth is either significantly larger than estimated or a flat "3D-type" plane as depicted in all the traditional interpretations of the universe/realm and simplified here.

View attachment 35444

Correcting my earlier post:

I've read and re-read this page many times in a futile attempt to reconcile the flood of ideas that describe our universe.
The image above, for one, depicts the simulation projection which is really ? that which we call the aether.
which is basically electricity. in various forms of radiation. Matter is one of the forms, and humans are infrared beings inhabited by invisible beings. Religions call this entiy the soul, or spirit. In Plato's philosophy the Nous is the intellect, or the highest level of the Form. Which begs the question,,,,,,, where does intelligence come from? Creativity? Imagination? AI??
But I digress.

The second Big Question this page provokes is the form of our universe. Inside a toroid where an accretion disk (or pancakrd disks) becomes the Infinite Plane. And here we go again. New vocabu.ary.

AllTheScience

All The Science - Explore the Latest Research and Discoveries › what-is-a-superfluid.htm

What is a Superfluid? (with picture) - AllTheScience
May 21, 2024A superfluid is a phase of matter capable of flowing endlessly without energy loss. Th

Some other sites I looked at suggested helium as the main ingredient of the superfluid. not waters as in Bible and myths?
I earlier compared the mechanism as something like an orrery. or Antikythera device. Wheels within wheels. clock within a bigger clock? Vibes of Cosmos made a video (posted a few pages back, I think) that presents a magnetic "compass" that moves overhead, giving us a real precession of the equinoxes, and ice ages and warm centuries.

 

[Breizh]

The image above, for one, depicts the simulation projection which is really ? that which we call the aether.
which is basically electricity. in various forms of radiation. Matter is one of the forms...

I wasn't familiar with the simulation projection concept, to me it resembles the depiction used by multiple traditional cultures world-wide (which was why I posted it).

I've seen the description of matter as slowed down light which seems appropriate. Looking at the sun seems like a reasonable way to get light directly instead of via plants, or animals that eat plants. Since water is a liquid crystal, drinking water that's been exposed to sunlight is also a valid way to get light.

Which begs the question,,,,,,, where does intelligence come from?

The collective all-that-is perhaps? Dan Winter covers this extensively.

The second Big Question this page provokes is the form of our universe.

A toroidal dynamic presenting a multitude of potential planes?

 

[Seiya]

That post is a killer! You cover so many ideas that it's hard to respond to your well-expressed points.

As for my perception of the moving skylights, I've been trying to understand how it all works, but . . . it still eludes my feeble comprehension.
I've been studying FE for over 10 years now. The stationary plane is an easy landscape to prove.

I'm not sure of my "well-expressed" but if you managed to understand the idea, I'm already happy.

You said you've been studying FE for ten years, which is fantastic and something I value a lot because you dedicated your time to understanding, interpreting, and knowing what you're talking about, regardless of whether you share the same ideas as me.

Today, if you say the world isn't a ball spinning around several balls in all directions and at the same time traveling at I don't know how many km/h, the vast majority of people will automatically go against you, but are unable to explain why. I know: Mind control.

I didn't study it, I research this deception about Space in general and try to uncover the lie and its origin, where it was born, and I always try to apply or test the information. I don't believe in people, I believe in facts and evidence, of course within certain limits, after all we live in society, and when I get on the tube or bus or cab, I automatically believe that the driver knows how to drive and goes where he says or I said to go.

There is a thin layer that differentiates them, and I believe that's exactly where the enemy attacks.

You might be wondering why I'm saying these things. It's because I believe that "flat earth" is the key to liberating mankind.

The enemy is weak; he cannot win with the truth. The enemy is smart but not intelligent. These are two distinct things, but people assume they are the same. Smart comes from Middle English smerten, "to cause pain, to suffer pain," That's why creatures love the word smart and give us smart phones, smart cities, smart meters...

When you realize you've been deceived, that you've been led to believe the world was created by some insignificant accident in the vast infinity when in reality it's the opposite, your perspective on life changes. I don't yet know how to explain this effect in words.


Imagine that 6 years ago I was at the Empire Leicester Square for a special IMAX screening of the Apollo 11 remaster, with a Q&A session with the directors and promotion of Virgin Galactic, and the first customer – a lady who said she paid something ridiculous like £500,000 to be the first to travel.

A month later I broke that spell. Everything about Space is so ridiculous that I almost can't believe how I could believe in any that. I'm trying to understand why, so I can understand how people remain under a spell.

The dome, though, is far beyond our abilities to explore. And the Body Scientific does all it can to hide the true nature of What Lies Above. What are the stars?

I don't believe the Dome is physical, as that disgusting creature Hilary refers to it; I believe it's formed by electromagnetism. I believe we live inside the torus feald.

Created by the Sun, The Sun God, and not The Son of God. What get my nerves is how people repeat things without even trying to understand what they're talking about. "Sun worshippers are bad, and evil" is one of them. Tell me how it can be evil? The Sun is literally (I hate using that word) what sustains life; without it, you die. That should be the minimum knowledge anyone should have, but not even that. Mind Control

I believe the stars are a reflection or projection of lands beyond our world.
I believe our world is inside a "crater" and the moon is a reflection of the land, but not like Vibe the Cosmos but the Godgevlamste way.
Sulpicius Gallus M


I started, actually I'm trying to observe stars, but having a clear sky in London is difficult. Besides, I have to learn how to configure the camera better.

I recently observed a planet, Venus, and I noticed that it has a heptagon shape, which confirms a huge amount of information. Furthermore, it is behind or inside a layer of water. Perhaps it's not water as we know it, but it's definitely a transparent liquid. This became even clearer with the SpaceX launches hitting the dome and the waves they form.

We are influenced by the planets, sun, and moon. Astrology has been intentionally turned into nonsense and ridiculed so that we don't understand the direct connection we have with the sky and all celestial bodies with our own bodies. And this enters into a vast other field that can't be explained here.

Especially Polaris, the pole star, North Star. What is it and how high is it?
It seems do-able to calculate the altitude if stars by triangulating with "known" distances on earth.
That math, btw, is only possible on a flat earth, since triangles need a level base along which to draw a right angle.

I have not found any sources that give clear answers or good memes that reveal and illustrate the dimensions of the dome/s.
This one, Flat Earth Facts - Flat Earth University, suggests "a parabolic peak height of 6216.3mi/10004km."

Voliva estimated 3000 miles to the sun.
On the Flat Earth, How High is the Sun?
View attachment 35442

But what about the other celestial lights?

I have no interest when it comes to medications, I'm already not interested and I foresee a scam, because nobody can perform these medications.

And this Flat Earth University website that sells diplomas, it's clearly a scam by these creatures. 666 in all the garbage they put out there.

I started, actually I'm trying to observe stars, but having a clear sky in London is difficult. Besides, I have to learn how to configure the camera better.

I recently observed a planet, Venus, and I noticed that it has a heptagon shape, which confirms a huge amount of information. Furthermore, it is behind or inside a layer of water. Perhaps it's not water as we know it, but it's definitely a transparent liquid. This became even clearer with the SpaceX launches hitting the dome and the waves they form.

We are influenced by the planets, sun, and moon. Astrology has been intentionally turned into nonsense and ridiculed so that we don't understand the direct connection we have with the sky and all celestial bodies with our own bodies. And this enters into a vast other field that can't be explained here.

And if the so-called 7 heavens actually describe multiple layers of domes in the firmament, what distances separate them and what is the highest point?
Nasa conducted "atom" bomb tests in the 1960s to map our first dome. But the ones above ?? I don't see how.

As far as I know, "7 Heavens" refers to the five planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn, plus the Sun and the Moon. All the planets are in the torus vortex, orbiting as if they were around the sun, but in reality, they are orbiting within the vortex at different altitudes. What we see are holographic projections.

The Atom Bomb is as fake as NASA. That's why this story is as fake as all the others.

One guess is the "celestial sphere" that the god Atlas holds up.
If a sphere is perfectly round, perhaps the universe has the same diameter as the flat earth. which is ~24,500 miles. The radius would be half, rounded ~12,000 miles.
That might indeed be the "outer limit" of the toroidal earth realm, where our planette forms an accretion disk in the middle.
Above us is a hemisphere, which term is another clue the Body Scientific lets us see, while lying about the real big picture.

View attachment 35443



And then there's this --



Notice the words I underlined. The prefixes use the same letters.
alt-itude...... alt- is a Latin prefix meaning high
lat-itude.....lat- Latin for breadth, width
high and wide, huh?

God Atlas smells like Mercator bullshit deception to me.

I believe be more like this