SH Archive Is "Flat Earth" a PsyOp?

SH.org OP Username
zatrix
SH.org OP Date
2020-03-15 20:16:02
SH.org Reaction Score
62
SH.org Reply Count
79
You are right about that. Here is an uncommon one I found: The Christian Topography of Cosmas, an Egyptian Monk, or the Opinion of Christians Concerning The World. This was allegedly written "c.550 CE)- discovered and reprinted by the nefarious London cultural team- the Hakluyt Society operating 1847-1899. This book is available, with a discussion of the firmament.

So Martin Luther and others all discussed the firmament and it is gone. Now it's back. The question is why? PSYOP? perhaps. consider this:
1. One of the greatest obstacles to socialism is creationism, and according to the KJV, the firmament is part of God's Creation.
2. The FE and firmament are said by its proponents to be evidence of God's Creation.
3. A concerted effort has been made to eliminate God's Creation.
4. The belief of the firmament and FE has been largely eliminated from mainstream religion.
5. The Smithsonian and many other agencies have served to hide possible evidence of God's Creation, among other things.
I conclude this line of thinking with point 6: An effort to use the FE and firmament as a PSYOP would be illogical: Serving to bring back a movement that they spent 100 years eliminating. It would be equally illogical to bring back so many people to research ancients, giants, deluges, and cataclysms, among other things, because interest in these topics would represent an obstacle.

Another is the need for excessive reinforcement of the globe model:
Propaganda is utilized to reinforce the globe model, would not everyone agree that the globe is placed everywhere? The shows I grew up watching were not dinosaur heavy, but they certainly are in my kid's shows. I would say have the clothing in most stores are dinosaurs, space ships, and solar systems. Why teach kids the planets and their names, before learning practical matters, apart from selling them junk for their birthdays? There are very few jobs that require a belief in the solar system, so its reinforcement and the expense to control the FE movement is out of proportion. Unless it represents a failure in thought control, which to TPTB, it is something they take very seriously.

The science fiction movement, and 1920-2020 has been one scientist after the next with scientific "discoveries" that either lack experimentation or seriously flawed. And what really says the most about the academic community is their willingness to support Alien Creation, created to cover for the most flawed "discovery" of evolution. They have hidden well the fact that we are devolving in all respects.

Questions for things I want to understand:
1. Since 100 years has been spent on "oppositions of science falsely so-called"-ie., eliminating God- Of all the PSYOPs, why use one that causes a resurgence in Divine Creation?

2. Or, why ressurect the beliefs of Divine Creationists, and also create an Alien Creation movement at the same time?

3. If this is a PSYOP, how could it be calculated which fraction of the fraction of people with "fringe beliefs"? Or is this an experiment with data being collected? One has to think that they conduct thought control experiments in the same fashion as they test new chemicals.

thanks
Woow, you (and others here) are a good thinker.
When I read your comment, it comes up in my mind, that the best opposition is controlled opposition. So it is possible that the subject is in the hands of people whose purpose it is to make it impossible to understand flat earth, because the have (knowingly, or not) weak faulty arguments.
I think so because your arguments are só correct.
But, as always, it is a tricky brain exercise. One wrong point in the building of logic and it collapse. One must thus be careful.
But, again, those paintings! They verraden (betray?) (dutch) themselves.
A picture says so much! And they (those people) are ijdel (love themseves) . The ego is playing its part.
 
A psyop, that is, a psychological operation, has to do mainly with controlling or steering a narrative for controlled opposition purposes. That being said, flat earth cosmology can be the truth while at the same time being utilized within a psyop or controlled opposition program. The MO of the Cabal is to get behind all populist movements, either to discredit or at very minimum to steer the narrative into manageable opposing factions that they then can employ their typical "divide and conquer" tools to create the necessary dissonance to foment disunity.

The wise researcher has learned to transcend these kind of pitfalls by allowing the research to speak for itself, learning what he/she can learn from the data drops given, adding to the overall mix with careful thought, study, and scientific analysis, always remaining open-minded to any new data presented, regardless of its source. As a seasoned investigator, the wise researcher continues to build their case, never closed to what is offered, but always with due diligence so as not to be taken for a ride down some contrived rabbit hole leading to nothing other than confusion, frustration, and cognitive dissonance.

It is obvious to any seasoned researcher that all of the hot topics, including the flat earth cosmology discussion has been long infiltrated by the usual suspects within the intelligence community. So continue to be on guard in all of your research, acting with due diligence, verifying all data presented, which obviously goes for all of the other hot topics in the search for truth.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Lying about lying is a tactic. The real psyop is GloBaal HeLiocentrism.

When my FE penny dropped a few years ago I thought, "what will the game controllers do when the players in the simulation turn around and face them?"

Saying. I know. We know.

We are living through the controller's reaction to our "'global' awakening".
 
Last edited:
Yes, it is.

Flat Earth is a concept concocted to hide the Concave Earth and discredit conspiracy theories. In addition, conspiracy theorists are portrayed as "freaks".

In 2015-2016, images taken inside the International Space Station proved to be fake. That's when people woke up.

Then the authorities took action and came up with the "flat earth" theory. In this way, most of the truthers were caught up in the "flat earth". Then, the people who subsequently woke up made a U-turn and went back to sleep.

Although the concaveness of the Earth has been proven many times, it is sad that humans are still caught in the flat earth psy-op.
Where would you suggest finding more on the conclave Earth? All I can say for certain about the shape of our home is that IDK. I'm still waiting on someone to show me why engineers don't account for curvature. I don't think its a sphere, but if its flat, how the Hell isn't this talked about more by pilots and the like. Would like to read up on this conclave Earth
 
Is flat Earth a psyop?
It's not an easy question to answer in that term because flat Earth is generally thought of as a flat disc with elephants on top of a turtle or something along those lines.
If that's considered a psyop then what about all the other flat Earth theories that do not suggest a disc or water falling off a disc.

I'd more likely say the premise of a flat Earth that is used as the standout suggestion against the mainstream ideal, is used as a psyop to discredit flat Earth theories, overall.

As soon as flat Earth is mentioned people start to ask how water stays on or what's under it or how gravity works and how space works. And so on. All based on a disc mindset.

When alternate theories are brought to the forefront they're immediately thrown to the back in favour of the argument against a disc.

Without turning anything into a globe v flat I'll simply reiterate that the word, flat, is looked upon as literally a flat disc world when the reality (for me) is in actual water being flat, not particularly land, because we all know this isn't the case for much of the land we know, in terms of real level flatness.

After all that waffle I will simply say the flat Earth mindset is absolutely not a psyop. I would add that the flat Earth disc with cascading waters and ships falling off....is the psyop, intended to discredit the entire flat Earth theories and to obviously keep a certain magical Earth story intact.
 
Flat Earth is one of the biggest discrediting projects ever. Its aim is to discredit conspiracy theories and make people who are interested in conspiracy theories "loony".

For example:

Apollo: I think the Moon and other space travels are fake.

Alex: Did you take your meds? I bet you believe in Flat Earth too.

This is the point you have to understand.

There is no a single evidence of Flat Earth. Much of the evidence presented by the Flat Earthers has been debunked. A few con-artists are still pushing this to make money.

A person who does not entrust his logic to someone else knows that the Earth cannot be flat.

Flat Earth is a psychological operation, nothing else.
How narrowminded of you. There is actually plenty of evidence supporting flat earth. Ask myself this alot. Anything that mainstream indoctrination rams down our throats has to seriously be questioned because most of us know they peddle lies and propaganda.
 
Yes, it is.

Flat Earth is a concept concocted to hide the Concave Earth and discredit conspiracy theories. In addition, conspiracy theorists are portrayed as "freaks".

In 2015-2016, images taken inside the International Space Station proved to be fake. That's when people woke up.

Then the authorities took action and came up with the "flat earth" theory. In this way, most of the truthers were caught up in the "flat earth". Then, the people who subsequently woke up made a U-turn and went back to sleep.

Although the concaveness of the Earth has been proven many times, it is sad that humans are still caught in the flat earth psy-op.
Hi, do you have any proof of the Concave Earth theory?
 
The rectilineator experiment was inconclusive , the design should have included a check by inclusion of a spirit level/plumbbob . This would have removed the effects of topography.

Mullins' Force the Line experiment is the one to carry out . FEcore of buffoons need to do this if they are serious , obviously they aren't if they don't.
 
The rectilineator experiment was inconclusive , the design should have included a check by inclusion of a spirit level/plumbbob . This would have removed the effects of topography.

Mullins' Force the Line experiment is the one to carry out . FEcore of buffoons need to do this if they are serious , obviously they aren't if they don't.

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OwyuJYBFSc


The Rectilineator is by far the most accurate physical test ever performed. Every conceivable paradigm for error was taken into consideration. There is literally a level built into the design of the machine.

Also, FE core's 2018 Force the Line experiment in Brighton Colorado discovered concave curvature as well.

Fe Core Force the Line
 
The rectilineator experiment was inconclusive , the design should have included a check by inclusion of a spirit level/plumbbob . This would have removed the effects of topography.

Mullins' Force the Line experiment is the one to carry out .
Indeed!

And I had an idea that would be far less expensive to at least show that we cannot be on a sphere:

wUAydMd.png
Drone requirements:
--solar powered
--multiple cameras... at least front, back, under, and one on the attitude indicator
--programmed to fly only straight
 
Indeed!

And I had an idea that would be far less expensive to at least show that we cannot be on a sphere:

View attachment 20074
Drone requirements:
--solar powered
--multiple cameras... at least front, back, under, and one on the attitude indicator
--programmed to fly only straight
OR you could just reconcile with the fact that the tropics are the same size, and "Flat" Earth has never ever demonstrated that they are 2 different sizes. As that projection you just posted requires.
 
FE core of gatekeepers are doing a Force the Level - not a force the line . It probably was the most accurate at the time but it is flawed. Look at Mullins design
 
Do you have even one proof that this beLIEf of yours is an actual fact?
I'm sorry, do you have evidence to support the tropics are not consistent in size? Or are we supposed to just assume that every single sailing vessel who's ever sailed in the southern hemisphere was faking their navigation logs?
 
I'm sorry, do you have evidence to support the tropics are not consistent in size? Or are we supposed to just assume that every single sailing vessel who's ever sailed in the southern hemisphere was faking their navigation logs?
No, no, no... the problems of navigating the southern hemisphere are well documented and this has been shown to you prior.

But again, your claim... claims require proof. I am just showing you that you have none.
 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top