SH Archive Is "Flat Earth" a PsyOp?
- Thread starter Archive
- Start date
Fabiorem believes he lives on a hollow round ball in the vacuum of space.
He believes flat earth is the psyop used to keep evidence of the hollow earth out of the public arena.
That is beautifully put, if may easy so.
My guess is that the "Flat Earth" psyop was put forward in order to hide the fact, that the Earth has a sizable population of inhabitants (aka aliens/lizzies/etc.), that live and procreate in huge cavities within the Earth's internal volume. When the Earth is flat, it would be theoretically impossible and not even debatable.
Really? Why would it be impossible? Whatever shape the earth is, there can always be lands / tunnels / entities below us. No FE adherent believes the earth is flat as a pancake
If there are other entities mingling with us on this plane(t) they don’t seem to have been seen so far so whatever alteration of reality they have used up to now is working pretty well without having to create a whole ‘globe earth / flat earth’ psy-op to convince us. Just start to question everything you have been told until you have good reason or compelling evidence to believe it. That would be a start.
Why lie about iterations? They do some things for the hell of it.
If oil is not organic, but created by a process in earth, flat earth theories would be something that would be in some companies interests to create a smoke screen. I dont think thats happening in any big extent, but at least this scenario is somewhat "down to earth" 
How thick is the flat Earth do you think?Really? Why would it be impossible? Whatever shape the earth is, there can always be lands / tunnels / entities below us. No FE adherent believes the earth is flat as a pancake
The "pancake" circumference is well measured at 40,000 km at the "equator", if I remember correctly. So, to the outsider the Earth will look like a cylinder then?
- Joined
- May 20, 2023
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 84
Very much agreed, well said. Once Flat Earth took off and got out of hand for the controllers they conveniently put the algorithms in place that made searching for true flat earth content a difficult thing. Hence the reason for Bitchute and other video platforms to combat the sensorship. The controllers know that if the lid of the globe deception was blown off they would end up with a shitstorm of enraged people bent on destroying the powers that be that propagated this mass deception....something that perhaps needs to happen...
In what way has evidence for Flat earth been debunked? You can’t debunk flat water and you can’t debunk the fact that we see way to far across the flat water for this to be a ball. I’m not sure what model is the right one but it most definitely isn’t a ball spinning and darting through infinite space. Flat Earth is not a Psyop. I will say that there have been people strategically placed within the flat earth community to muddy the waters. There’s no denying that the Jesuits have played a huge roll in starting the propagation of this Copernican deception (Copernicus was a Jesuit by the way) and so was George Lemetri who came up with the Big Bang lie. It all fits together as one big deception to try to discredit the Bible and discredit God and get people focused on space and believing we are nothing more then a speck of dust in an accidental cosmic ever expanding explosion. But we were created in the image of God, not a cosmic accident living on a spinning testicle.
Last edited:
A nice link giving simple details on how earth is mapped by survey :
Difference between Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveying - Definecivil
Scroll down to the table -interesting reading , seems like the 37 feet of curvature over 12 km is never taken into account.
Psyop flat earth?!! lol
Difference between Plane Surveying and Geodetic Surveying - Definecivil
Scroll down to the table -interesting reading , seems like the 37 feet of curvature over 12 km is never taken into account.
Psyop flat earth?!! lol
Theory just more bloody theory aka guessing. No different to any earth shape bollocks. Its ALL guessing.
We just aren't able to determine the shape of earrh nor if it has one or needs one. And if this explains gravity I'm George Carlin.
From here, bolding mine Full text of "Cosmic Forces of Mu"
The Force of Gravity.
The sun's forces are neutral and in no way affinitive to the cold magnetic division. Nor do the sun's forces in any way affect it or its workings. Earthly elements are not affected in Any way by the sun's forces. They arc under absolute control in their movement of the cold magnetic division. This force extends its influence to the last particle of atmosphere on the edge of space.
The influences of the cold magnetic force is over elementary matter only. It is neutral to forces generally.
I might say one exception only, and there it is antagonistic.
The cold magnetic force is ever attracting and drawing elementary matter towards itself— the central magnet ; only when density intervenes is its further progress stopped. When the progress of matter is stopped by density, the central magnet then anchors it to the spot where it stops. There it remains until another opportunity occurs for it to move again towards the magnet.
The central magnet, according to various calculations made by scientists, who have made a study of the probable thickness of the earth's crust, seems to be about 45 to 50 miles below the earth's surface.
I have never personally made any calcullations, depending on what I find written. Their figures seem to be correct from phenomena which I have studied for a dis- tance of about 20 miles down. All movements of matter must therefore be towards this 45-50 mile line.
The downward movement of matter is assigned to the force of gravity, which is correct. I cannot find, however, that any of our scientists have attempted to explain what the force of gravity is that carries matter down, or either to show where and how it originates.
A force is that which moves matter (not that every movement of matter is the work of the force of gravity). The force of gravity is one of nature's tools to move elements in a definite direction, namely, towards the central magnet. Also to prevent the outer division of the earth's centrifugal force from carrying any elementary matter out into space.
Gravity is the working of the cold magnetic division of the central magnet. The central magnet has two antagonists: first, the outside division of the earth's centrifugal force; and second, density. Density is not active but only resistive, yet gravity is responsible for the earth's density from the Archaean rocks to her surface. Even the atmosphere is afected by the cold magnetic force; as this is apparent in itself,
it needs no explanation.
We just aren't able to determine the shape of earrh nor if it has one or needs one. And if this explains gravity I'm George Carlin.
From here, bolding mine Full text of "Cosmic Forces of Mu"
The Force of Gravity.
The sun's forces are neutral and in no way affinitive to the cold magnetic division. Nor do the sun's forces in any way affect it or its workings. Earthly elements are not affected in Any way by the sun's forces. They arc under absolute control in their movement of the cold magnetic division. This force extends its influence to the last particle of atmosphere on the edge of space.
The influences of the cold magnetic force is over elementary matter only. It is neutral to forces generally.
I might say one exception only, and there it is antagonistic.
The cold magnetic force is ever attracting and drawing elementary matter towards itself— the central magnet ; only when density intervenes is its further progress stopped. When the progress of matter is stopped by density, the central magnet then anchors it to the spot where it stops. There it remains until another opportunity occurs for it to move again towards the magnet.
The central magnet, according to various calculations made by scientists, who have made a study of the probable thickness of the earth's crust, seems to be about 45 to 50 miles below the earth's surface.
I have never personally made any calcullations, depending on what I find written. Their figures seem to be correct from phenomena which I have studied for a dis- tance of about 20 miles down. All movements of matter must therefore be towards this 45-50 mile line.
The downward movement of matter is assigned to the force of gravity, which is correct. I cannot find, however, that any of our scientists have attempted to explain what the force of gravity is that carries matter down, or either to show where and how it originates.
A force is that which moves matter (not that every movement of matter is the work of the force of gravity). The force of gravity is one of nature's tools to move elements in a definite direction, namely, towards the central magnet. Also to prevent the outer division of the earth's centrifugal force from carrying any elementary matter out into space.
Gravity is the working of the cold magnetic division of the central magnet. The central magnet has two antagonists: first, the outside division of the earth's centrifugal force; and second, density. Density is not active but only resistive, yet gravity is responsible for the earth's density from the Archaean rocks to her surface. Even the atmosphere is afected by the cold magnetic force; as this is apparent in itself,
it needs no explanation.
Last edited:
A few years ago I asked a head engineer and friend in a major world capitol if the curve of the earth is accounted for by his colleagues building tunnels, bridges, highways....some of them "the world's longest".
He asked around and with quiet surprise...
Said, no.
I'm glad you gentlemen are doing your homework. If you haven't already done so, you might want to check out Jack Churchward's website. He is the great-grandson of James Churchward. He has written a book/s regarding his great-grandfather's work. I haven't had the opportunity to peruse Jack's website nor read any of his books so I don't know what his stance is on his great-grandfather's work. I guess I better get busy and do my homework in regard to Jack Churchward
- Joined
- May 20, 2023
- Messages
- 83
- Reaction score
- 84
Sorry, you can’t quell the flat earth theory once and for all because of falsified gravity. We simply see waaay to far across the flat water for there to be any curvature. No curvature is ever detected or measured. Only in cgi cartoons and fake space footage.
Similar threads
