SH Archive Possible books, weapons and musical instruments of the Giants

SH.org OP Username
KorbenDallas
SH.org OP Date
2018-04-08 08:48:44
SH.org Reaction Score
83
SH.org Reply Count
82
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-24 00:58:46
Reaction Score: 1
Dunno about that. Seems Japan had some steel technology ahead of its time. Much like the viking ulfbrecht swords were ahead of their time. Researching it however, leads to a lot of dead ends. I was convinced the ulfbrecht sword tech came from the Vatican by a show on the history channel.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2018-07-24 01:01:20
Reaction Score: 1
I research historical weapons and such, and yes, katanas are made with high quality steel. Though it's not like it's a godsend. By the time the katanas were invented, we have longswords and such in Europe, Middle East, and other parts of Asia. They all have high quality steel, and they should, since they are needed as effective weapons.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-07-24 01:31:41
Reaction Score: 0
Yes, but there is steel and there is steel. Tested ulfbrecht swords had a steel on par with the best of today. Of course there are less than 10 available for study, and there were many contemporary fakes.
Much like the Viking stories of their far superior swords were considered myth prior to their discovery, Japan may have had a similar tale.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2018-07-24 01:39:44
Reaction Score: 0
I haven't really given dates to them, so that's still stands contested. Though not much of sword quality other than Youtube videos and metallurgy charts.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2018-07-27 21:39:08
Reaction Score: 1
Given the screenshot, looks fake though.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2018-07-28 03:37:15
Reaction Score: 3
We should have like a thread all about fake stuff, so we don't get carried away hahaha.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-28 10:19:48
Reaction Score: 1
Lols. That’s exactly what happens when posting on a small screen phone and in the sun. A good lesson for me. Will keep this one for our own fake history :)
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Hardy
Date: 2018-07-28 18:41:46
Reaction Score: 9
I also find this telescope suspicious but I'm not sure.It's from the great Exhibition in London 1851.
It looks like an oversized Table Telescope.
And if it's not a device from Giants why is there not a scaffold for let People see through.
It stands there like a curiosity which was found in a Giants house.

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-28 18:44:47
Reaction Score: 6
I like the size and location of the control knobs. Nice find Hardy.

Would be interesting to see what was on display at this 1851 exhibition.

Edit: need to look into this event. These handles are definitely for some other size humans.

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Hardy
Date: 2018-07-28 20:58:13
Reaction Score: 9
Very interesting this London exibition with the 'Crystal palace'....


but there is something( Giant?) going on with these old telecopes in general.
This one is from the Great Industrial Exposition of Berlin.
The 'Himmelskanone' sky cannon still exists (the rest of course is gone) and it is surprisingly still the biggest lens telescope of the world, they say.
But the still existing one does not look like the one on the postcard.
The whole scenerie with the building looks strange.

And then we have the Great Paris Exhibition Telescope of 1900. First i thougt what's that?
A Collider?Then i saw the Illustration and i found it even better than CERN.
They projected the view from the sky straight into a theatre/Cinema?What the hell is this?

 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-28 21:04:47
Reaction Score: 6
That’s some telescope. You are onto something here Hardy.

EC9BAF53-C323-4D00-905C-9B75FFE5E1AC.jpeg
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: PrincepAugus
Date: 2018-07-28 21:08:35
Reaction Score: 6
Given refracting telescopes' sizes and usage, I don't see how the two form the Great Exposition in London or Berlin are out of place, but the Great Paris Exposition Telescope likes exactly like a linear particle accelerator! In fact, I can't find any images showing the end of the "telescope" nor that big contraption in front of it.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-07-29 00:40:06
Reaction Score: 6
Interesting that there are like two pictures of this device only. @Hardy, lol, you should have started a separate thread for this thing.


And the same story continues.

The company which had organized in 1886 to build the telescope declared bankruptcy after the Expo, and the telescope was put up for auction in 1909. No buyer was found and eventually the components were scrapped.

Since it was built for exhibit purposes within a large metropolis, and its design made it difficult to aim at astronomical objects, it was not suited for scientific use. When the year-long exposition was over, its builders were unable to sell it. It was ultimately broken up for scrap;
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: RowOfEleven
Date: 2018-08-01 21:33:30
Reaction Score: 10
To be frank, I immediately came to comment about the Octobass and that you are wildy off base for suggesting the origin be tied to giants... but then I realized that everything I know about the Octobass is from the incestuous circle of academia (I hold degrees in this field). I looked into this further and found that this truly is a mysterious instrument in it's origin, not even to speak of its odd and mysterious design!

I was taught that the Octobass is a young instrument (invented in 1850) and was never designed to be played without it's elaborate pedals, hammers/frets, and pedestal. What we are told in music academia is that it was a thought experiment first and secondarily an experiment in creating a sound that would be felt by the orchestra and audience. And it is felt, the lowest string is below the range of human hearing, tuned to 15Hz. The string instead sounds rhythmic, as we can only hear the overtones above the fundamental (regular/main) pitch of the string. When it's played, you can feel it in your chest. (I had the honor of being in person with one of these while a musicologist played it.)

It really is a head scratcher, the instrument is beyond odd and no one (minus very recent composers) have written for it. Heck, there are only 7 in the world. It's been said that Hector Berlioz wrote for it in the mid-late 19th century, but after an exhaustive search I was unable to find anything written for or about it beyond a mere mention in Berlioz' Orchestration Treatsie, written in 1848.

The luthier who crafted it was a very famous violin maker from Paris, Jean Baptiste Vuillaume. He made instruments that are still coveted to this day by many musicians. Without the login info for my old uni, I am unable to delve into this much further that I already have, but it doesn't seem completely nonsensical that Vuillaume would craft such an instrument... just unlikely. Especially considering the lack of information on the topic of this weirdo bass.

Now, about those giant books... What I was taught was that the time and resources put into making a book in these times was high enough, such that they found it easier to make books rather large and with big print, so that a group of people could read them at one time.
This idea is specifically about very old notated gregorian chant music. In this one utilization, as sheet music, I can totally see the explanation they gave being feasible. A choir would read it all at once.

Just an aside, these (gregorian chant) books would have been made in the 16th century according to standard music history. The Uni I went to had one in their main library. I can confirm that they are very very big in person!
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: asatiger1966
Date: 2018-08-02 00:18:25
Reaction Score: 1
I was under impression that the original Samurai were not Japanese but from the survivors of Hyperborea.
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-08-02 00:31:34
Reaction Score: 14
They were Ainu people. Honestly, I am at a loss as to when today’s japanese people even showed up in Iapon. It appears like may be 300-400 years ago.

Everything is do screwed up historically, isn’t it?

But this Ainu issue is for a separate thread please.

Additionally GIANT sources: Giant Skeletons Plus

* * *

Abraham Lincoln’s speech excerpt.

752160B9-0C38-4181-B569-F7CD6F6BC848.jpeg
 
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Juanchi
Date: 2018-08-27 11:57:38
Reaction Score: 6
Father Crespi had some giant related items in his collection, some helmets, a giant chone and a guitar( or a model of one). I guess you all knows about the Tayos Cave, it's said that many of the fahter Crespi items proceed from the cave system, were given to him by the Shuaras, the "guardians" of the cave system.

 
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top