The hotel has some implications that could connect it to the other topic of research here on the forum -
the history of humans traded for cannibalism
Human Specimens Buried at Crescent Hotel
So the "news" story is a kooky doctor discarded his medical waste in bottles and intentionally buried them out back of the hotel. But the real story is much darker.
I will preface this by saying that I got this information from a secondhand source - I decided to play tourist and take the tram tour of the city. On an aside if you do make your way up to this place I do recommend it if only for the lovely stroll through a freemasonic wonderland of "my dick is much bigger than yours" architecture. The man hosting the tour was from a family who had been living in Eureka Springs practically from its inception, and was the chief of police in the town for many decades.
Norman G. Baker - Wikipedia
Not only was this man a complete charlatan, swindling people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars - but his trade seemed to be the killing of cancer patients.
The tour guide went into some general details about Norman and how much of the town hated him, but left it at that. On a break I approached him and coyly asked him why he didn't bring up the body parts buried on the grounds of the hotel. After a bit of reluctance and pulling me slightly away from the gathered crowd he told me that not only was he killing patients for their money - but that the buried body parts (they only really mention "jars of specimens" in the news - but there was far more there that wasn't disclosed) were buried
after he had been carted off to jail awaiting trial.
The implication he was making was that he was not working alone in this venture. Consider the people who were occupying this city during those times (and even now, likely). Consider what they
may have had predilections for if IHASFEMR is a pervasive lifestyle of the people of the times. Consider what they stood to lose if anything outside of "doctor kills cancer patients for money" comes from discovering evidence for the trial against the man.
I could tell this former chief of police really truly
hated this man and what he did to the community. His hatred did not seem to be directed at a charlatan, but perhaps directed at a more general evil that rests beneath the town he oversaw for so long. Of course, this is all my interpretation but I consider myself adept at reading non-verbal communication.
Edit: Bonus miscellaneous photos of the town from my last trip