Moonlight Towers and the Wayne County anomaly

Tetromino

Core Member
Active Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2023
Messages
127
Reaction score
345
Before I begin let me show you a photograph of the Wayne Country Building in Detroit (officially dated 1902) that can be found on the Library of Congress:
4a08703v.jpg
Some of you may have seen this before but if not then let me explain. This is actually a good example of so-called vanilla skies but there is something in particular that I want to discuss further. Look at the puddle and you will see the reflection of a tower that is being hidden. I encourage you to go to the website and download the biggest tiff version so you can get a real close look at some of these details that nobody would have even noticed without a magnifying glass but now with computers we are able to digitally zoom in on these images that have been scanned.

Let us zoom in:
1696624881874.png

Now at first I was thinking what on Earth are they trying to hide here? If you look at the top of the photo you will see that it hasn't been covered completely and this tower is incredibly tall. I think it's also worth noting the "Secret Service" poster. It looks as if this was just after some kind of catacalysm.

1696625062176.png

If you take a closer look at the photo you will notice there are loads of wires in the sky, some of them seem higher than the building:
1696625548124.png

The tower itself is being held by wires which goes to show just how tall it is.
1696625125776.png
Keep a note of that tram wire pole in the middle.

In this next photograph you will see that the tram wire pole has been dug out and moved. Why? You will also notice that a lot of the wires in the sky have gone and so has the tower:
1696625480953.png
This photograph is dated 1900 according to the website. Two years before the first photograph apparently but I can prove this is incorrect.

Zoom and and you will see this:
1696626056024.png
Again this is something nobody would have ever seen on the photograph unless they had a magnifying glass but now we can see it. What is it?

I said I can prove the dates are incorrect so here it is:
1696626153858.png
This photograph is dated 1905 and you can see the pole is in the same place as in the previous photograph this time it's been paved over as if nothing happened. There are now flag poles on the building which were not there before. You can't tell me they put the tower there, moved the tram pole and then took it back down again and moved the tram pole back. So the dates are inconsistent and these could potentially be older than the website tells us.

1696626339774.png
Whatever the real date is the other tower has disappeared by the time this photograph was taken. That's not all, I have yet another interesting photograph:
1696626625861.png
This is also from 1902 according to the website. I don't even need to zoom in for you to see that there is one of these towers standing in view but I will anyway:
1696626740574.png

There is also another one to the left near a chimney:
1696626774714.png
It seems these towers were all over Detroit and I was wondering what on Earth they could be for.

Then I found out they were apparently "Moonlight Towers".
1696627001969.png

Now here are some depictions of other "Moonlight Towers":
1696627126088.png
Another one:
1696627165174.png
Even the Eiffel Tower:
1696627213963.png

Now I thought that was it until I thought about it some more and noticed that the "Moonlight Towers" in Detroit look very different from these other depictions. Some of these "Moonlight Towers" are still used in Austin, Texas:
1696627716132.png
1696628934932.png
They don't look bright enough to be of much use but we're told that they originally used carbon-arc lamps however I find that ludicrous considering the fact that they would need to be replaced almost every day. I don't believe somebody was climbing every tower every day to replace every lamp.

Also here is a photograph I just found of some "Moonlight Towers" in New Orleans from an unknown time:
1696629184389.png
Where are the lights? It looks like one of them is just being used to hold a cable up. Look at all those telegraph lines too (I think telegraph lines will need their own thread soon).

I cannot find any photographs of these moonlight towers being turned on in their day except for this blurry and dubious image:
1696629207723.png

Here is another photograph of a moonlight tower in Detroit:
1696630152672.png
Notice how the tower has a lamp on the bottom. Was the tower not bright enough then? Was it even working by the time this photograph was taken? I must say it is quite a contrast too with all these electric trams alongside horse and carts.

These towers could well have been used for lighting purposes however I don't believe they worked the way we are told. I sense atmospheric electricity.
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Benjamin Fulford wrote about the harvesting of Moon energy recently. Fulford claims to have contact with many of the secret societies in the world. It's worth looking at this link to see his take on alternative history, including suppressed technology. The Hidden History Taught by Secret Societies – Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis


Regarding Moon energy, he says -

"Another and more esoteric suppressed ancient technology was the harvesting of a mysterious form of moon energy People known as lunatics were often especially sensitive to this form of energy. It is supposed to open windows to alternative realities and long-distance viewing of places and events in this reality. It was this remote viewing capability the Pentagon was interested in."

From the same article -

"The connection with the Asian secret societies (which I have written about extensively previously) led to the Pentagon contacting me via their “men who stare at goats,” psychic warfare division. The person they sent was Paul Laine. At the time I met him, his cover was that he worked for the Oracle Corporation owned by tech billionaire Larry Ellison. Laine provided information about fantastic inventions from the past that had since been suppressed. One example was all the telegraph cables you see in the old Western movies. They were powered by electricity harvested from the ground. This technology is now lost to us."
 
Could any of this be related to hiding the airships (blimps) of old? Before the Hindenburg was used to move society away from free energy and helium to all things oil…
 
This photograph is from the archived thread that trismegistus posted:
1696816119730.png
It is important to view the tower from this angle to compare with the next photograph that I have found which is apparently from 1891.

From Wikipedia:
1696816337741.png
Unfortunately this is the highest resolution available but you should immediately notice that there are two "Moonlight Towers" however the big "C.A.SHAFER" building is not there. This is definitely facing the same way because the building on the left is the same and you can see the same church spire in the distance. What is going on here?
 
This reference to using moonlight for remote viewing - noting it is helpful during sieges:

Three Books of Occult Philosophy, or of Magick; Written by that Famous Man Henry Cornelius Agrippa, Knight, and Doctore of both Laws, Counsellor to Caesar’s Sacred Majesty, and Judge of the Prerogative Court, translated out of the Latin into the English Tongue by John French. Henry Cornelius is dated 1486?-1535, with the book being published in 1651.

From Chapter VI “Of the wonderfull Natures of Water, Aire, and Winds:

Aristotle tels of a man, to whom it happened by reason of the weakness of his sight, that the Aire that was near to him, became as it were a Looking-glass to him, and the optick beam did reflect back upon himself, and could not penetrate the Aire, so that whithersoever he went, he thought he saw his own image, with his face towards him, go before him. In like manner, by the artificialness of some certain Looking-glasses, may be produced at a distance in the Aire, beside the Looking-glasses, what images we please; which when ignorant men see, they think they see the appearances of spirits, or souls; when indeed they are nothing else but semblances kin to themselves, and without life.

And it is well known, if in a dark place where there is no light but by the coming in of a beam of the Sun somewhere through a litle hole, a white paper, or plain Looking-glass be set up against that light, that there may be seen upon them, whatsoever things are done without, being shined upon by the Sun.

And there is another sleight, or trick yet more wonderfull. If any one shall take images artificially painted, or written letters, and in a clear night set them against the beams of the full Moon, whose resem
blances being multiplyed in the Aire, and caught upward, and reflected back together with the beams of the Moon, any other man that is privy to the thing, at a long distance sees, reads, and knows them in the very compass, and Circle of the Moon, which Art of declaring secrets is indeed very profitable for Towns, and Cities that are besieged, being a thing which Pythagoras long since did often do, and which is not unknown to some in these dayes, I will not except my self.
 
The first photo looks, to me, that the building is not in use and is being repaired or refurbished maybe? (I have been a lurker on this site for a while but this is my first post - apologies if this subject has been covered already). There are a couple of things that make me think this:

1696953794062.png

Looks like wooden stairs built to go in through this window. My thought is, if they were stone, they would go all the way to the ground. Also, these stairs are not there in other photos.

In this one:
1696953866442.png
Looks like it's boarded up and my brain has convinced me that the sign says "No Admittance". But that's with me squinting and reading what I, perhaps, want it to say. :)

Finally, I am curious about these symbols:
1696953985022.png
1696954010692.png
They seem to be on several of the windows.
 
This photograph is from the archived thread that trismegistus posted:
It is important to view the tower from this angle to compare with the next photograph that I have found which is apparently from 1891.

From Wikipedia:
Unfortunately this is the highest resolution available but you should immediately notice that there are two "Moonlight Towers" however the big "C.A.SHAFER" building is not there. This is definitely facing the same way because the building on the left is the same and you can see the same church spire in the distance. What is going on here?

Another interesting thing here: why does the C.A.SHAFER sign looks altered ?

1697044677687.png

And here is another angle of the "C.A.SHAFER" building absence:
1697048771038.png
 
Last edited:
This photograph is from the archived thread that trismegistus posted:

The clarity of this photo is astonishing. I know they used to use massive plate glass negatives, which have a resolution much better than modern digital cameras. However the contrast on the big building on the left and some of the buildings further back down the street is incredible.

We can estimate some of the parameters involved. For example there's a little bit of motion blur on the cyclists in the bottom right.Most of the people look sharp, even though they are clearly moving. So my opinion is the shutter speed must have been at least 1/50th to 1/60th.

The dept of field is huge too. The well in the foreground looks sharp, and you can read the lettering on distant signs. So the aperture must be quite tight, maybe f7.1 or smaller. So how sensitive must the film have been?
 
And here is another angle of the "C.A.SHAFER" building absence:


1697079064754.jpeg


I found this on a random pintrest page - it claims to be a view from the top of the Shafer Building in 1901. It's from a different perspective than the rest of the photos, but it seems to match the time and place that structure could have existed. Although this may have just as easily been taken from the comfort of a hot air balloon...
 
What is going on here?

Some possibilities:

1. Faked images.
2. Partially faked images (modified originally-genuine images).
3. Unknown technologies in a conventional human environment.
4. Known (and/or unknown) technologies being used in circumstances that are different to the circumstances humans assume are present.
5. Other.

Obviously, I'd guess 4. Extending the guess, I'd guess the towers are lighting gantries used at the time 'our' stage was created.

And on the seventh day, the director told the stage crew to remove the temporary lighting.

Several other observations in the thread are consistent with Guess 4. Like the wooden stairs and boarded up doors/windows, paint on the glass (warns builders that glass has been installed in this window).

Failing that, I'd guess option 1. SH has links to image testing tools, which I'd use to check Guesses 1 and 2. If I trusted anything. :)
 
Last edited:
Majestic Building, Detroit - SkyscraperPage.com
City Hall and Majestic Building, Detroit, Mich.
https://www.pinterest.co.uk/pin/maj...-photos-historic-detroit--311381761707544317/
https://www.loc.gov/item/2016797371/
Majestic Building | Detroit Historical Society
Majestic Building | Historic Detroit
https://www.shorpy.com/node/22319
https://www.shorpy.com/Moonlight-Tower
Once Upon a Town
1900-1949 | woodward
1899 business and professional directory of Detroit and surrounding towns.

build0.jpg
Construction begins on the Majestic Building in 1895. The Old City Hall is in the background.

Photo from the Burton Historical Collection.
https://historicdetroit.org/galleries/majestic-building-old-photos/

build1.jpg
The Majestic Building under construction in 1896.

Photo from the Burton Historical Collection.
https://detroithistorical.pastperfectonline.com/search?utf8=✓&search_criteria="moonlight+tower"&searchButton=Search
https://www.neatorama.com/2014/01/07/Before-Street-Lights-There-Were-Moonlight-Towers/
http://detroitarchitectjournal.blogspot.com/2012/12/moonlight-towers.html
https://www.clickondetroit.com/feat...cal-moonlight-towers-now-light-up-texas-town/
https://www.collectorsweekly.com/articles/let-there-be-light-bulbs/
https://www.amusingplanet.com/2016/04/the-forgotten-era-of-moonlight-towers.html
https://www.fourstjames.com/blogs/s...s-moonlight-towers-an-old-fashioned-ambiance?
https://theclio.com/entry/25474
https://www.nola.com/entertainment_...cle_97928a63-d1e4-5433-8a71-5f47c0cd2186.html
https://fornology.blogspot.com/2018/04/detroits-nineteenth-century-moonlight.html
https://michmemories.org/exhibits/d...]=Majestic+Building&per_page=100&view=gallery
 
Last edited:
Wayne Country Building in Detroit
4a08703v.jpg

Within the information on this thread there are so many discrepancies! The above image has the tower next to it (badly) disguised, yet it is known these towers existed. Detroit supposedly built 122 of these towers which were later sold to Austin and a few are still in use. So why hide it in the picture? The towers were 'built' in 1882 and used until about 1915.

---------

This article that was linked earlier in the thread speaks of these towers as a new technology developed to light these new cities. Supposedly was all over the midwest. But then the buildings got too tall and the light wasn't able to spread out so cities stopped using them.

Moonlight Towers: Light Pollution in the 1800s

From the article:

"What followed [an 1876 advancement in arc lighting] was a true boom of arc lighting. Hundreds of thousands of arc lights were installed, mainly on streets and squares but also on markets, in harbours, railway stations, public buildings, department stores, exhibition halls, hotels, theatres, office buildings, castles, monuments, museums and libraries.

Paris set the ball running in 1877, with 54 street lights on the Avenue de l’Opéra and 80 lamps in the Grand Magasins du Louvre. London and other European cities followed in 1878, and in 1879 the first arc lights were installed in the United States.

The US quickly became the leader of electric arc lighting. In 1884 there were already more than 90,000 arc lamps lighting the night sky in the US, and that number rose to 235,000 in 1890, when virtually every US city was using arc lighting, more than 400,000 in 1902 and almost 700,000 in 1907. But it was not just in numbers that the US outstripped Europe and Great Britain.

Moonlight towers

While European cities placed electric candles on posts, like we do today with street lights, the Americans had the idea of lighting entire cities and villages by means of a grid of towers that stood up to 300 feet (90 metres) tall."


And also:

" Detroit as a shining example

In most American cities the lighting tower infrastructure was combined with arc lamps placed on poles or hung at intersections, and complemented with gas or and oil lamps, or incandescents. Detroit was the only large city in the US (and in the world) lighted wholly and exclusively by the tower system.

Detroit placed 122 towers (see illustration at left and at right) with a height of 100 to 180 feet, lighting 21 square miles of the city. All towers were installed in the 1880s and remained in use up to the end of the 1910s.

The lighting infrastructure in Detroit was regarded as the future of street lighting, and stood as an example for the rest of the US. The following excerpts are taken from “Municipal lighting”, a practical guide for city lighting that was published in 1888:

The press of the country has uniformly conceded Detroit to be the best-lighted city in the world. All its streets, yards, backyards and grounds are illuminated as effectually as by the full moon at the zenith. The blending of light from the mass of towers serves to prevent dense shadows.”


Again I ask - Why are they hiding that tower in the first picture of the OP if the towers were all over Detroit?

Here's a few possibilities:

1.) That first picture may have been taken before the Moonlight Towers Narrative cover story was developed within the USA around 1880 and implemented in Detroit in 1882. The streets are certainly wide open and muddy, with just a few people around. This would put the picture before 1880.

2.) This could have been one of the pictures used by the Resetters to recruit immigrants over in Europe. They would not have cared about the shoddy job retouching the photo when it was meant to be reprinted and would have less sharpness. This would also place the picture prior to 1880 when the Moonlight Tower Narrative cover story was developed.

3.) Whoever did the shoddy retouching and cut out the tower also harshly cut out all the sky. Perhaps there was an airship attached to the top of this tower or floating in the sky. This would place the picture before the ceation of the Moonlight Tower Narrative around 1880.

4.) The towers were actually built in 1882 for the stated use and this picture was retouched for aesthetics. Meaning an official picture of the building was needed for the city records (or equivalent), but they didn't want that pesky tower in the shot distracting from the symmetry of the building. This would place the picture after 1882.

5.) The picture could have been altered at the Library of Congress. Their team in charge of covering up the past saw it and covered it up. THEN learned of the cover story that allowed the tower to exist. But they were so busy at that time that they never corrected the problem by getting a replacement image. This would place the picture anytime before 1900, according to several other images in the OP that don't have the tower present.

I cannot choose just one of these. I believe that both 1.) and 2.) are correct.
(Tip of the hat to usselo for format.)

This specific 'Moonlight Tower' obviously became a problem for the City Fathers, probably because of someone altering this particular picture. So it was removed within 18 years of being 'built' to avoid the discrepancy and make later pictures consistant with this earlier picture.

----------

The LA streetlights are a different, more modern design. They don't have the wires connecting them to the ground for power. Which is why they needed their own power plant.

---------

So here's what I think is going on with these towers. I think many were pre-existing but the 'bulbs' were broken or the 'wiring' was faulty. Then more towers were built or fixed when the arc lighting revolution happened in 1876 and they could be used again. The wires that connect them diagonally to metal poles in the ground are not just to support them. The wires are a crucial part of the tower structure. They connect the tower to the ground and give energy a guidewire to move along.

I think that these towers are related to vereyas. Vereyas are the structures used for energy, rejuvination and healing by the ancient cultures of the area we are calling Tartaria (the Scythians, Pagan Rus, steppes peoples, Caucasus region). Vereyas came in many sizes, but were always the same basic cone shape, with a tall center post, slanted top and slanted or straight sides, usually made of iron (think gazebos and music pavilions). There were temporary vereyas set up for festvals that looked a lot like these towers, a tall pole with wires coming down on all sides connected to the ground. I think Maypoles are a cargo cult version of these portable vereyas.

8.jpeg

This one is interesting. It clearly says "Ice Cold Water" which could be challenging on a hot summer day. Unless the fountain unit interacted with the energy focused in by the vereya to cool the water. Also, the words are in English, but the flag is purposefully obscured.

12.jpg

This one is just lovely. The vereya pavilion is surrounded by a larger open air vereya. The numerous glass hanging bulbs must glow at night. The palm trees are made of metal and are probably the energy collector for the outer open air vereya.

14.jpg

Many old Russian churches would have an iron vereya built into the structure, with the domes being the roofs.

I keep harping on the following story being VERY important. There is so much in it. And some good info in the comments too. It's also where the vereya pictures above are from.

The last of the Mohicans (by tech_dancer)

Here is the original story on tart-aria.info. Lots of other great articles, too.

The last of the Mohicans - tech_dancer - tart-aria.info

-----------

These are the New Orleans moonlight towers, all lined up in a row. They line the streets where the streetcars are. They may be powering the streetcar electrical grid as well as casting light. Keep your eyes out regarding how those grids get powered in general. We may need a thread for them along with the telegraph line thread proposed by the OP. The 'Moonlight Towers' may be powering all these functions, or powered them in the past when they functioned properly.

5d13d79f231e6.image-1.jpg

I found something else interesting in New Orleans while looking into Moonlight Towers.

These two images are the same plaza from two different angles. It is New Orleans at night. In the first picture you can see the steamships are on the river to the right, the church in front has a brilliant light shining from it's steeple, and beyond the church you can see the row of lighted Moonlight Towers lining Carondelet Street. This image is supposed to be 1883, so the church light would be an arc light.

20231015_223303.jpg

The second image is dominated by the Moonlight Tower. You can see the steamships on the river in the background.
In the foreground of the second image is a little metal gazebo in the middle of the road.

20231015_223331.jpg

Look closer at that little gazebo. The first thing that I thought was "There's a small vereya within the light of a large vereya, does that amplify the energies?" Then I saw the designs on the small vereya, specifically the roof.

6a00e0099229e88833010536d7c4c4970b-500wi~3.jpg

There are spears projecting upwards at regular intervals with trefoil type heads, which is a shape we are learning is important to generating aetheric energy. There is a crescent on the peak, which is ancient symbology used on flags, frequently with a star and whatever weapon the locals used. The star itself may have represented energy weapons. The hammer and sickle symbol often used by Red countries is a clever way to incorporate the crescent crossed with a weapon.

20231015_223424.jpg

But on this gazebo vereya the crescent is crossed with a tomahawk!!!! Which is a weapon developed by Native Americans. Which tells me that when that little iron gazebo vereya was built, the Native Americans were in power.

6a00e0099229e88833010536d7c4c4970b-500wi~2.jpg

Here are two traditional tomahawks:

native-american-stone-tomahawk.jpg
BLADES-REVIEW-029.jpg

This vereya gets even more interesting if you look inside it. There is a bearded man wearing some kind of crown or turban with a central spike coming out of it.

6a00e0099229e88833010536d7c4c4970b-500wi~6.jpg

3ac157ca667c416cc948f93a5b81529b.jpg
turban_indian.jpg

There are no newspapers or articles for sale around him, so this vereya is not being represented as a sales kiosk. And there are no advertising posters on the outside of the structure, so this vereya is not being represented as an advertising kiosk. It's not big enough to house a band or music performance. So what is this random structure in the middle of the road? It has to have some purpose.

The artist would have had an understooding of it's purpose at the time they drew this picture. And the artist's choice was to draw a single person with pointed headgear sitting inside an open air gazebo where people walking by can see him and talk to him.

At first I believed that he was either an individual sitting there to receive the positive benefits from the vereya or that he was a fortuneteller. Passersby would perhaps pay him a few coins to see what information he could pull out of the aether to tell them. The headgear with the spike would increase the signals received, whether psychic, spirit or radio-type transmission.

Then as I was writing I received a deeper understanding of all vereyas...

They are ALL receiving stations.

These kiosks are the small local receiving stations. Just like churches are larger local receiving stations. And cathedrals were receivers and transmitters. People would go to vereyas and churches to receive blessings and rejuvenate their health, as well as bringing their 'iron objects' to get recharged. These people and objects were RECEIVING this energy being focused and enhanced by the shapes and patterns of the iron vereya.

I think this fellow sitting in the vereya was the news source and the postmaster of the neighborhood. Instead of paper mail or email, he would pick up mental mail. People could pay to pick up and send messages. Messages may have come from across the world. In the Old World these duties would have been handled by priests inside of churches. But here in the New World people were not as controlled by the Church and they could communicate however they chose. This Elder understood what this vereya could be used for, so he put on his special headgear and sat down to receive whatever energy or messages came his way. I will call him a 'wise Elder with special headgear sitting in an ornate vereya and delivering news and messages from the aether.' Local Elders probably took turns occupying the vereya 24/7 so they wouldn't miss any important incoming information. Let me repeat that these may have been psychic, spirit or radio-type transmissions (or perhaps the voice of our creator?)

----------

The natural progression of this would be the newspaper kiosk, supposedly invented in Barcelona in 1888. People would have been used to going to the vereya for their news. The vereya in the first picture below probably had contained a 'wise old man with special headgear sitting in an ornate vereya and delivering news and messages from the aether' and then was then changed into a newspaper seller with a cap sitting in the same structure selling the current false narrative in print from all over the world.

Typical-Paris-Newsstand-19th-century-1024x744.jpg
newspaper-kiosk-madrid-grand-via-spain-plaza-de-santa-domingo-BKC4MN.jpg

Since vereyas used to be where you would get your mental mail, it would make sense to use a similar shape and intricacy when switching to paper mail. Easier transition for the sheeple general public to re-cognize where to put their letters.l

sydney-australia-march-red-historic-street-post-office-mail-box-rocks-neighborhood-circular-to...jpg

5c419975231848a5d5de391c15616171.jpg


And the Fortune Teller Booth is the cargo cult version of 'wise Elder with special headgear sitting in an ornate vereya and delivering news and messages from the aether.'

0b5d21d96709846c8c5eff39c428898b.jpg
f808d17febff15fd99fa2146fd0a3f24.jpg

To better understand what I am saying, I suggest reading Frostychud's excellent thread:

Temples and Churches as Radio Frequency Receivers
 
Last edited:
The Detroit Publishing Company.
https://www.loc.gov/collections/detroit-publishing-company/about-this-collection/
Detroit Publishing Company Collection
Detroit Photographic Company’s Views of North America, ca. 1897-1924
Playle's: Detroit Publishing Company

Why would this company not scrub moonlight towers from all its photographs?
Why would it not scrub other photographs which contained old tech in a similar vein or are these moonlight towers the sole survivor from that old tech?
The photography company was in business at the time that building was put up. Its business was flogging photographs and postcards ergo if old tech was actually old tech or was actually state of the art tech the photographers would know, the people of Detroit would know so who exactly is this supposed old tech being hidden from?

If the moonlight tower actually got its power from the air why aren't there similar gathering devices on top of the tall buildings all around in the square photos?
One on top of the Majestic building for example would reach further into the ether than the moonlight tower does and presumably be even more effective at gathering electricity.
As it was the Majestic building had its own power station in the buildings basement as evidenced at one of the links in that list.
Also all the tall buildings like the Majestic have a steel or iron matrix inside them which puts much more steel or iron into the ether than the moonlight tower does so surely the buildings internal structure should be gathering electricity from the ether in the same manner. An antenna on top of it would be literal icing on the cake.
 
If the building is efficient at collecting charge then a power station in the basement of the Majestic could possibly be a means of supply of atmospheric DC to the surrounding buildings .

You have a high voltage low current drawn from the air, feed it through a transformer to give a low voltage high current supply. Seems possible to me.
 
Here is a postcard made by the Detroit publishing company of the City Hall in Detroit.
Front and centre is a moonlight tower. No attempt to hide it.
From here Old City Hall | Postcards | Historic Detroit

full_downtown190.jpg
If the building is efficient at collecting charge then a power station in the basement of the Majestic could possibly be a means of supply of atmospheric DC to the surrounding buildings .

You have a high voltage low current drawn from the air, feed it through a transformer to give a low voltage high current supply. Seems possible to me.
If?
Surely if the claim of the tower being a collector is true then all steel framed structures are etheric electricity gatherers.
Where are the adverts for the gear required, to be base about it and or the patents for said gear?
 
Why exactly would pre-reset old world technology have any patents?
These towers are not old world tech. They were put up in the late 1800's a time where just as today everyone was rushing to seek the presumed commercial ptotection of the patent system.
Odds favour anyone finding working old tech or figuring out how some non working old tech worked would patent 'their discovery'.
Detroit had one of the most extensive moonlight tower systems in the country inaugurated in 1882.
From here Detroit's Nineteenth-Century Moonlight Towers
In 1894, Austin purchased 31 moonlight towers from Detroit.
From here Liberty Hill Man Builds His Own Mini Moontower

Define what reset means to you.

But on this gazebo vereya the crescent is crossed with a tomahawk!!
No it isn't.
I looked on tinyeye for a bigger ergo clearer image but there aren't any. However here are three images of the gazebo from frostychuds thread and its neither hammer and sickle nor crescent and tomahawk.
Screenshot_20230808_104507.jpg N_CanalStreet_children_ed.jpg Slocomb & Baldwin Hardware Canal St_resized.jpg
I did find this page about the canal street towers.
Henry Clay and Moonlight Towers on Canal Street
And this.
Julia Street: The Moonlight Tower - My New Orleans
Still can't find any other info for that drawing such as where it originated or its date.
Scratch that.
Note: Same illustration was published in "Scientific American" 18 March 1882 and in Harper's Weekly that same year.
Seems the tower in the engraving was never built, hey ho.
Stated the Scientific American, "It is doubtful whether there is in the whole of the country another space...so largely benefited by the new method of lighting as the busy crescent of the New Orleans levee."

That 1882 article introduced an ambitious proposal for a 500-foot illumination tower at the foot of Canal Street. The narrow cast-iron cylinder would be erected in sections from the bottom up, its zenith tethered by guy wires to the four street corners. Inside would be a rather claustrophobic elevator for a "light trimmer" to be lifted daily to the top, like a human bullet shot slowly up a vertical barrel. There, he would insert new carbon rods into the lamps -- a wildly dangerous job called trimming -- to cast the equivalent light of 40,000 candles over the next evening.


The lower Canal Street needle was never built, but the idea of centralized towers advanced. In 1884, the Committee on Fire Department and Lighting recommended to allow the Brush Electric Light Co. to erect a light tower uptown. It would save the city the expense of 50 existing gas lamps, the committee noted, and not cost a dime, because Brush offered to erect the first tower gratis -- and then get paid to build many more.
The city agreed to erect light towers all through the "suburbs," meaning just about everywhere outside the French Quarter.
The first tower was erected in 1884-1885 by the Dryades Market on present-day O.C. Haley Boulevard at Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard. While the Detroit Iron Tower Co. installed the triangular 175-foot-high structure, the Brush company handled the 12,000-candlelight-power lamps. That same year, the World's Industrial and Cotton Centennial Exhibition at present-day Audubon Park was lit by ten 25,000-candlepower towers, and its exhibits proudly showcased electricity in all its uses.

More towers followed: on Canal at Bourbon; along Poydras, Carondelet, Camp, Dryades and Carrollton; on North Tonti and Lapeyrouse; on Galvez at Dumaine.
From here https://www.nola.com/entertainment_...cle_97928a63-d1e4-5433-8a71-5f47c0cd2186.html
 
Last edited:
Tips
Tips
Please respect our Posting Rules.
Back
Top