- Joined
- Aug 25, 2020
- Messages
- 2,005
- Reaction score
- 8,103
Is that really the case? Why would it be more difficult with higher numbers?Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: dreamtimeDate: 2018-10-18 14:51:40Reaction Score: 1
Is that really the case? Why would it be more difficult with higher numbers?Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: dreamtimeDate: 2018-10-18 14:51:40Reaction Score: 1
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-10-18 15:24:24
Reaction Score: 1
I’m with @whitewave on this one. Unsupported by anything, but I think that huge population could have contributed to the prior collapse of the system.Is that really the case? Why would it be more difficult with higher numbers?
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-10-18 18:22:10
Reaction Score: 9
The Roman Senate at one time wanted to put armbands or some easily identifiable mark on the slave population and Cicero (or one of the voices of opposition) pointed out that if the slaves saw that they greatly outnumbered the ruling class there would be nothing to stop a revolt.Is that really the case? Why would it be more difficult with higher numbers?
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dianag
Date: 2018-10-18 19:11:25
Reaction Score: 5
About 15 years ago I went on vacation with my sister and we did the antebellum home tour on the River Road. Many of the homes we visited were from the late 1700's-1840's. The history of one home stands out because the family had 23 children of which only 3 lived past the age of 20. There were many diseases, many were weather related like pneumonia, colds, flu. I thought how sad it would be for the parents to lose so many of their children.How long ago was the Great Biblical Flood?
Was browsing through some random 19th century family pictures provided by the Google Images search. And you can see for yourself that families were predominantly pretty big. I do understand that through out time there were wars, epidemics, volcano eruptions, floods, birth deaths, hurricanes, and all other sorts of things. All those things, supposedly, reduced the life span of those individuals who lived in the past. That is according to our dogmatic way of thinking. In reality it appears that we do not really know what the reality had looked like.
So, undeniably, there were some big families back then. I guess at the time their parents were not really worried about paying their kids through college, and all other responsibilities of today.
A thought of Noah crossed my mind. Scholarly consensus sees Moses as a legendary figure and not a historical person. Rabbinic Judaism calculated a lifespan of Moses corresponding to 1391–1271 BC; Jerome gives 1592 BC, and James Ussher 1571 BC as his birth year.
Basically we have at least 1300 year before Christ, and 2018 after. So, roughly 3,300 years.
I will just "play" with the bible story, because it is something easy to work with. We have a time frame and an exact number of people who survived the Great Flood. Those people were:
For the sake of my little experiment, I will consider that only younger generations can have children. I also will not consider that they had some ridiculously long life spans.
- Noah with wife
- Shem with wife
- Ham with wife
- Japheth with wife
The below count is not going to be tremendously accurate. The Excel table was put together pretty quickly, and I oversimplified it, vs. making it overcomplicated.
The table is attached. You can download it and do with it whatever you are pleased. You can modify it and have parents live longer, or whatever.
What I did in the Excel table.
If you choose to update the table, and bring the parents over into a separate column, and have them live longer than the set step, the population number is going to be greater.
- Parents can have children only within the set step (I will use 30 years) - column 1
- Both parents die at the age equal to the column 1 set parameter
- Column 2 is number of families - assumption one male/one female
- Column 3 is number of children per family - I will have 3 children per family
- Column 4 is the total number of children (future parents)
- Column 5 is the total population of the Earth
So I start with 3 fertile families of 2 people in each (Noah's son + wife) x 3 = 3 families
Each family will have 3 children. These 3 children per family will continue throughout the entire count.
Parents will die at the age of 30 years old.
First of all, everything is a rough and hypothetical assumption here. I chose 3, because it appears to be a fair number when taken into consideration are: wars, epidemics, volcano eruptions, floods, birth deaths, hurricanes, etc. I think 3 is pretty conservative.
The Great Flood was 1530 years ago?
The world population today is (supposedly) 7.6 billions of people. How long ago was the Biblical Flood if we use my little excel table calculations?
And the answer is 1530 years ago. Because if it happened any earlier then that we will end up with the following population numbers:
- 2010 years ago - 5 trillions of people
- 2400 years ago - 978 trillions
- 2700 years ago - 56 quadrillions
- 3000 years ago - 3 quintillions
- 3900 years ago - 623 sextillions
- 3960 years ago - 1.4 septillions
* * * * *
Question: where are the people, and when was the Great Biblical Flood?
P.S. Once, again, please feel free to correct my excel table. I am not sure I like the numbers it produced.
NOTE: forum member mythstifieD created his own, more sophisticated, version of the population excel spreadsheet - File #2 below. Detailed explanation can be found here.
NOTE #2: special thank you goes to @MoonWatcher for creating a video demonstration (youtube vid above) of the puzzling population growth rate we experience.
I think we are being lied to about the survivability at the time. Here is a little quote, which if you read in between the lines does say a lot about life longevity back then.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-10-18 19:33:53
Reaction Score: 9
Imperial Russian Army - WikipediaThe term of service in the 18th century was for life. In 1793 it was reduced to 25 years. In 1834, it was reduced to 20 years plus five years in the reserve, and in 1855 to 12 years plus three years in the reserve.
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: UnusualBean
Date: 2018-10-18 20:03:45
Reaction Score: 9
My theory is that a lot of the tribal societies in Africa still retain knowledge of the old world through oral tradition, and once TPTB feel it's been sufficiently stamped out, Africa will finally be allowed a chance to recover. The same thing has happened all over the place, there's like a pattern to the whole thing. "Forget or die".You know, I was wondering why no one is really doing anything productive about Africa.
The desertification will destroy most of their farm lands within the next 30 years, and combined with the anti-fertility efforts they will get in line soon.
after the major wars there is a flood of people fleeing their homeland....their roots...their very dna maybe...I am certain this is what's going on with middle east refugees and african migrants....then it's so easy to forget who you are because you no longer remember where you came from. Your dna has changed from the food...etc.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: OnthebitDate: 2018-10-18 21:33:09Reaction Score: 5
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: whitewave
Date: 2018-10-18 23:13:23
Reaction Score: 1
Nice catch there, KD! Kudos.I think we are being lied to about the survivability at the time. Here is a little quote, which if you read in between the lines does say a lot about life longevity back then.
Imperial Russian Army - Wikipedia
And in general, once you look into the issue of survivability in the 17th, 18th and 19th century, the official narrative starts to fall apart.
This population shenanigans are quite disturbing. Probably the most disturbing of them all they are. One thing when we talk about the Great Flood wipe out. This 19th century stuff is just nutts.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: KorbenDallasDate: 2018-10-19 01:03:52Reaction Score: 5
The distant future may look like this:Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: dreamtime
Date: 2018-10-19 21:40:06
Reaction Score: 7
Does that imply that people were dying very early back then?I think we are being lied to about the survivability at the time. Here is a little quote, which if you read in between the lines does say a lot about life longevity back then.
Imperial Russian Army - Wikipedia
And in general, once you look into the issue of survivability in the 17th, 18th and 19th century, the official narrative starts to fall apart.
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: KorbenDallas
Date: 2018-10-19 21:43:01
Reaction Score: 3
I think it implies the opposite. Their life span was similar to ours.Does that imply that people were dying very early back then?
Moses (whenever he lived) said that the life span of man was 70 and, if by reason of strength (good genetics, I guess), 80 years. So not that different from today's life spans. However, in Genesis, God shortened the uber long life spans down to 120 years so man either degenerated from the time of Noah to Moses knocking down the longevity from 120 to 70-80 years or something happened to the environment preventing us from living 120 years. There are many legends/myths about ancestors living super long lives. I read about some Chinese guy (too lazy to look up his name) but in the late 1800's or early 1900's he had documentation of having lived over 200 years.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: whitewaveDate: 2018-10-20 00:57:28Reaction Score: 6
Natural lifespan is genetic, so whatever happened would've been directly in our bloodlines, not the environment. A person who doesn't have the genes to live to 120 will not live to 120, even if they do every single thing right in terms of health.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: UnusualBeanDate: 2018-10-20 01:32:30Reaction Score: 5
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: Tonep
Date: 2018-11-12 19:16:33
Reaction Score: 7
Never thought about this issue before. Thanks!How long ago was the Great Biblical Flood?
Was browsing through some random 19th century family pictures provided by the Google Images search. And you can see for yourself that families were predominantly pretty big. I do understand that through out time there were wars, epidemics, volcano eruptions, floods, birth deaths, hurricanes, and all other sorts of things. All those things, supposedly, reduced the life span of those individuals who lived in the past. That is according to our dogmatic way of thinking. In reality it appears that we do not really know what the reality had looked like.
So, undeniably, there were some big families back then. I guess at the time their parents were not really worried about paying their kids through college, and all other responsibilities of today.
A thought of Noah crossed my mind. Scholarly consensus sees Moses as a legendary figure and not a historical person. Rabbinic Judaism calculated a lifespan of Moses corresponding to 1391–1271 BC; Jerome gives 1592 BC, and James Ussher 1571 BC as his birth year.
Basically we have at least 1300 year before Christ, and 2018 after. So, roughly 3,300 years.
I will just "play" with the bible story, because it is something easy to work with. We have a time frame and an exact number of people who survived the Great Flood. Those people were:
For the sake of my little experiment, I will consider that only younger generations can have children. I also will not consider that they had some ridiculously long life spans.
- Noah with wife
- Shem with wife
- Ham with wife
- Japheth with wife
The below count is not going to be tremendously accurate. The Excel table was put together pretty quickly, and I oversimplified it, vs. making it overcomplicated.
The table is attached. You can download it and do with it whatever you are pleased. You can modify it and have parents live longer, or whatever.
What I did in the Excel table.
If you choose to update the table, and bring the parents over into a separate column, and have them live longer than the set step, the population number is going to be greater.
- Parents can have children only within the set step (I will use 30 years) - column 1
- Both parents die at the age equal to the column 1 set parameter
- Column 2 is number of families - assumption one male/one female
- Column 3 is number of children per family - I will have 3 children per family
- Column 4 is the total number of children (future parents)
- Column 5 is the total population of the Earth
So I start with 3 fertile families of 2 people in each (Noah's son + wife) x 3 = 3 families
Each family will have 3 children. These 3 children per family will continue throughout the entire count.
Parents will die at the age of 30 years old.
First of all, everything is a rough and hypothetical assumption here. I chose 3, because it appears to be a fair number when taken into consideration are: wars, epidemics, volcano eruptions, floods, birth deaths, hurricanes, etc. I think 3 is pretty conservative.
The Great Flood was 1530 years ago?
The world population today is (supposedly) 7.6 billions of people. How long ago was the Biblical Flood if we use my little excel table calculations?
And the answer is 1530 years ago. Because if it happened any earlier then that we will end up with the following population numbers:
- 2010 years ago - 5 trillions of people
- 2400 years ago - 978 trillions
- 2700 years ago - 56 quadrillions
- 3000 years ago - 3 quintillions
- 3900 years ago - 623 sextillions
- 3960 years ago - 1.4 septillions
* * * * *
Question: where are the people, and when was the Great Biblical Flood?
P.S. Once, again, please feel free to correct my excel table. I am not sure I like the numbers it produced.
NOTE: forum member mythstifieD created his own, more sophisticated, version of the population excel spreadsheet - File #2 below. Detailed explanation can be found here.
NOTE #2: special thank you goes to @MoonWatcher for creating a video demonstration (youtube vid above) of the puzzling population growth rate we experience.
Would like to give credit to whoever it was that linked this article in another thread but I wasn't paying attention before I closed out that tab. Sorry.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: whitewaveDate: 2018-11-17 09:41:31Reaction Score: 3
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: UnusualBean
Date: 2018-11-17 09:52:49
Reaction Score: 2
Now that I think about it, the utter lack of preparation for known natural disasters is pretty ridiculous. Like, no basements in Tornado Alley levels of ridiculous. The given reason is that the soil has too much clay in it to safely build basements... but then why the f**k are people living there? Unless the tornadoes came after most of the infrastructure was built...Would like to give credit to whoever it was that linked this article in another thread but I wasn't paying attention before I closed out that tab. Sorry.
Anyway, it's a highly informative article about earthquakes and the damage they cause and how unprepared we are. The relevance to this thread is the history of earthquakes mentioned in the article. There have been thousands and even tens of thousands of people who have died in one fell swoop from earthquakes and there have been a LOT of earthquakes in the amount of time we've been keeping records of such things. There are entire towns/villages that had zero survivors after the earthquake-producing tsunami. It's a double whammy-first the earthquake, which if that doesn't kill you, the proceeding tsunami surely will.
I was astonished at the amount of casualties incurred even in recent history. If these events have been a regular and continual occurrence throughout history, I can easily envision the population getting knocked significantly back accounting for the unexpectedly low population numbers.
KD: you're in a bad spot.![]()
Living in tornado alley I can tell you that the lack of basements is due to high water table, not so much the clay. I live about 20 miles from an area that repeatedly gets slammed by tornadoes-like every year. Last one uprooted trees, hurled buildings across fields. People died. And yet every year they rebuild the place. Some areas never get hit and others get hit all the time. Seems like the high risk areas should have mandatory underground housing and utilities. And some idgit (obviously not from Oklahoma) thought it would be a splendid idea to erect a sculpture full of metal shards over a highly populated area in a state that has such ferocious winds that a whole new category had to be invented for the tornadoes that come through here.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: whitewaveDate: 2018-11-17 21:17:08Reaction Score: 6
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: ISeenItFirst
Date: 2018-11-17 22:42:46
Reaction Score: 6
Good point. Clay soils and a high water table combine to be about the worst foundation situation possible.Living in tornado alley I can tell you that the lack of basements is due to high water table, not so much the clay. I live about 20 miles from an area that repeatedly gets slammed by tornadoes-like every year. Last one uprooted trees, hurled buildings across fields. People died. And yet every year they rebuild the place. Some areas never get hit and others get hit all the time. Seems like the high risk areas should have mandatory underground housing and utilities. And some idgit (obviously not from Oklahoma) thought it would be a splendid idea to erect a sculpture full of metal shards over a highly populated area in a state that has such ferocious winds that a whole new category had to be invented for the tornadoes that come through here.
Check out skydance bridge. For some reason I no longer have a button that allows me to upload pictures.
Our ancestors may not have had the technology we have to detect threats in the environment. Places like the Pacific Northwest are gardens of Eden but prone to killer quakes that occur on average every 250 years. That's enough time to build up a thriving civilization without ever having had a killer quake so you wouldn't know that they occur. Everyone dies so no warning to future inhabitants and the cycle starts all over again. We certainly have no excuse for not preparing but our ancestors may have.
Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.
Username: UnusualBean
Date: 2018-11-18 13:16:49
Reaction Score: 2
PNW has smaller earthquakes a couple times a generation, some of which get large enough to be felt hundreds of miles away. There's plenty of warning.Living in tornado alley I can tell you that the lack of basements is due to high water table, not so much the clay. I live about 20 miles from an area that repeatedly gets slammed by tornadoes-like every year. Last one uprooted trees, hurled buildings across fields. People died. And yet every year they rebuild the place. Some areas never get hit and others get hit all the time. Seems like the high risk areas should have mandatory underground housing and utilities. And some idgit (obviously not from Oklahoma) thought it would be a splendid idea to erect a sculpture full of metal shards over a highly populated area in a state that has such ferocious winds that a whole new category had to be invented for the tornadoes that come through here.
Check out skydance bridge. For some reason I no longer have a button that allows me to upload pictures.
Our ancestors may not have had the technology we have to detect threats in the environment. Places like the Pacific Northwest are gardens of Eden but prone to killer quakes that occur on average every 250 years. That's enough time to build up a thriving civilization without ever having had a killer quake so you wouldn't know that they occur. Everyone dies so no warning to future inhabitants and the cycle starts all over again. We certainly have no excuse for not preparing but our ancestors may have.
Searching the historical record of the Valley of Mexico for evidence of famines and epidemics, speaker Rodolfo Acuña-Soto of the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, and coauthors identified several drought-associated epidemics of hemorrhagic fevers that had swept the region, causing massive mortality. Among these, the authors describe four especially destructive epidemics that appear to have killed between 20-90 percent of the entire population, leading to societal collapse: the epidemics of 1003–1011, 1545–1548, 1576–1578, and 1736–1737.Note: This post was recovered from the Sh.org archive.Username: whitewaveDate: 2018-11-18 18:53:09Reaction Score: 5